-
Svenonius, E.; Witthus, R.: Information science as a profession (1981)
0.01
0.013309426 = product of:
0.033273563 = sum of:
0.01541188 = weight(_text_:a in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01541188 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.017861681 = product of:
0.035723362 = sum of:
0.035723362 = weight(_text_:information in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035723362 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.291-317
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.; Schmierer, H.P.: Current issues in the subject control of information (1977)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The intellectual foundation of information organization (2000)
0.01
0.00796406 = product of:
0.01991015 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=5056,freq=24.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
0.010472339 = product of:
0.020944677 = sum of:
0.020944677 = weight(_text_:information in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020944677 = score(doc=5056,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.25731003 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.173-175 (G. Campbell): "Bibliographic control rests on a rich and intriguing theoretical foundation. All too often, however, students and scholars of information studies pass this foundation over, perhaps because of its fragmentation. Information organization theory has evolved in tandem with practice, and particularly through innumerable policy decisions: its central tenets, therefore, appear in prefaces to manuals and catalogues, in library bulletins, in standards and rule interpretations, and in professional and scholarly conference proceedings. Gathering this theory together is a formidable task, and Svenonius has already made a significant contribution through the two sourcebooks she has coedited: Foundations of Cataloging (1985), and Theory of Subject Analysis (1985). With The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 'Svenonius goes a huge step further: she pulls the fragments of bibliographic control theory together and sets them within a holistic theoretical framework. The result is a significant contribution to LIS scholarship, one which evokes the best of all possible responses: dissatisfied cries for more. Svenonius divides her treatise into two parts containing five chapters each. The first part provides a theoretically-grounded articulation of the objectives, entities, languages and principles of information organization. The field, she argues, rests on three distinct philsophical traditions. Systems philosophy, as developed in library circles by Charles Cutter, gives a holistic and visionary dimension to bibliographic control: a tendency to see individual processes as part of a larger, coherent structure. The philosophy of science, typified in the field by Cyril Cleverdon in the 1950s, emphasizes the need to quantify and generalize, and to subject the tenets of information retrieval to empirical verification. Language philosophy introduces the concept of language rules, and argues that information organization is a "particular kind of language use" (p. 6): an approach which enables us to employ linguistic concepts of semantics, vocabulary and syntax to explain the processes of information organization. Having established this framework, Svenonius goes on to discuss the objectives of bibliographic retrieval systems. Deftly combining the seminal contributions of Cutter, Seymour Lubetzky, the Paris Principles of 1961, and the IFLA objectives of 1997, she produces five central objectives of bibliographic control: locating entitles (finding), identifying entitles (collocating), selecting them (choice), acquiring or gaining access to them (acquisition), and navigating a bibliographic database (navigation) (p. 20)". -
Weitere Rez. in: Information processing and management 37(2001) no.5, S.763-764 (G.C. Bowker); College and research libraries 62(2001) no.2, S.203-206 (M. Winston)
- LCSH
- Information organization
- Subject
- Information organization
-
Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978)
0.01
0.007797272 = product of:
0.01949318 = sum of:
0.011678694 = weight(_text_:a in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011678694 = score(doc=2623,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.007814486 = product of:
0.015628971 = sum of:
0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015628971 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The impact of computer technology on knowledge representations (1992)
0.01
0.00711762 = product of:
0.01779405 = sum of:
0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067426977 = score(doc=2379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=2379,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The advent of the computer has brought epistemological questions, heretofore the province of classificationists and philosophers, into the limelight of popular thought. No longer of only theoretical interest, such questions stand in need of operational answers, at least if computers are to process information intelligently. Answers to these questions are embodied in what today are known as knowledge representations. Knowledge representations are used for a variety of related purposes, including language and text understanding, cognitive research, expert system development and information retrieval. This paper focuses on the use of three computer-based knowledge representations of potential relevance for information retrieval: hypertext systems, cluster analysis and knowledge representations accomodating rule-based reasoning. It then considers research that might be pursued to inform the development of knowledge representations for information retrieval
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988)
0.01
0.006654713 = product of:
0.016636781 = sum of:
0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00770594 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
- Type
- a
-
Liu, S.; Svenonius, E.: DORS: DDC online retrieval system (1991)
0.01
0.0063011474 = product of:
0.015752869 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=1155,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A model system, the Dewey Online Retrieval System (DORS), was implemented as an interface to an online catalog for the purpose of experimenting with classification-based search strategies and generally seeking further understanding of the role of traditional classifications in automated information retrieval. Specifications for a classification retrieval interface were enumerated and rationalized and the system was developed in accordance with them. The feature that particularly distinguishes the system and enables it to meet its stated specifications is an automatically generated chain index
- Type
- a
-
McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: More on improved browsable displays for online subject access (1991)
0.01
0.0060245167 = product of:
0.015061291 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=1066,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Key problems of subject searches in online public access catalogs are that too much may be retrieved and that the display may be arranged in what appears to be an unintuitive and unhelpful manner. A study was undertaken on one large database to determine how often the display of a subject and its modifications and subdivisions extended over more than two screens and what the results on display would be of compressing geographic subdivisions and other modifications. The study then addressed the question of how often the display of a term and its subdivisions was interrupted by the appearance in the display of inverted headings, phrase headings, and headings with parenthetical qualifiers
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 10(1991), S.185-191
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986)
0.01
0.0056083994 = product of:
0.014020998 = sum of:
0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00770594 = score(doc=584,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986) no.5, S.331-340
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1997)
0.01
0.0051638708 = product of:
0.012909677 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=583,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
0.0047362936 = product of:
0.009472587 = sum of:
0.009472587 = weight(_text_:information in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009472587 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
- Imprint
- The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
- Source
- From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979)
0.00
0.0049910345 = product of:
0.012477586 = sum of:
0.005779455 = weight(_text_:a in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005779455 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.0066981306 = product of:
0.013396261 = sum of:
0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013396261 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994)
0.00
0.0047055925 = product of:
0.011763981 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990)
0.00
0.0047055925 = product of:
0.011763981 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.254-263
- Type
- a
-
McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An interview with Elaine Svenonius (2000)
0.00
0.0047055925 = product of:
0.011763981 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In an interview with Dorothy McGarry, Elaine Svenonius discusses her many-faceted career. Topics include her research interests in subject and descriptive cataloging (Svenonius notes that it "takes some untangling of vocabulary and semantics to see that the traditional bifurcation separating subject and descriptive cataloging is artificial"); her teaching experience, especially her use of Andrew Osborn's "active learning" seminar method; and her views about the development of information science and its relationship to librarianship.
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The epistemological foundations of knowledge representations (2004)
0.00
0.0047055925 = product of:
0.011763981 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: Bibliographical classification (1990)
0.00
0.0026970792 = product of:
0.013485395 = sum of:
0.013485395 = weight(_text_:a in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013485395 = score(doc=2404,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library classification and its functions. Int. Conf. on ..., 20.-21.6.1989, Edmonton, Alberta. Ed.: A. Nitecki u. T. Fell
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.00
0.0023357389 = product of:
0.011678694 = sum of:
0.011678694 = weight(_text_:a in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011678694 = score(doc=5612,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
- Type
- a
-
Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998)
0.00
0.0023357389 = product of:
0.011678694 = sum of:
0.011678694 = weight(_text_:a in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011678694 = score(doc=2838,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a project to explore ways of reconfiguring AACR2 for use in an automated environment. A subset of AACR2 title proper rules for books was chosen for analysis. A functional classification of the rule subset was developed, based on the 4 facets: Source, Choice, Form, and Definition. The rules were also classified according to whether they were core or peripheral. A prototype electronic interface was developed for searching and displaying the classified rules. The greatest problem in the rule reconfiguration stemmed from the structural problems of AACR2: rule groupings combining multiple subfacets under a single rule; rule redundancy; and rule scatter, between chapters, and between sections of chapters and appendices
- Type
- a
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging (1989)
0.00
0.0022102704 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Series
- Library and information science
