Search (35 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  1. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.00 
    0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  2. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic control (1990) 0.00 
    0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  3. Svenonius, E.: Ranganathan and classification science (1992) 0.00 
    0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article discusses some of Ranganathan's contributions to the productive, practical and theoretical aspects of classification science. These include: (1) a set of design criteria to guide the designing of schemes for knowledge / subject classification; (2) a conceptual framework for organizing the universe of subjects; and (3) an understanding of the general principles underlying subject disciplines and classificatory languages. It concludes that Ranganathan has contributed significantly to laying the foundations for a science of subject classification.
    Type
    a
  4. Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986) 0.00 
    0.002002062 = product of:
  0.0100103095 = sum of:
    0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0100103095 = score(doc=361,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.
    Type
    a
  5. Svenonius, E.: Directions for research in indexing, classification, and cataloging (1981) 0.00 
    0.0018875621 = product of:
  0.009437811 = sum of:
    0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009437811 = score(doc=1891,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper speculates on directions for research in the field of bibliographical control, where bibliographical control is taken to include indexing, classification, and cataloging. The approach taken is to consider questions in the field that need answering. The position taken is that while concerns of a how-to-do-it nature drive this field's research, which is of an evaluative or developmental nature, there is a strong need for this research to be backed by basic theoretical research
    Type
    a
  6. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.00 
    0.0018875621 = product of:
  0.009437811 = sum of:
    0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009437811 = score(doc=3606,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
    Type
    a
  7. Svenonius, E.: Good indexing : a question of evidence (1975) 0.00 
    0.001651617 = product of:
  0.008258085 = sum of:
    0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008258085 = score(doc=1890,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 12(1975), S.33-39
    Type
    a
  8. Svenonius, E.: ¬An ideal classification for an on-line catalog (1989) 0.00 
    0.0016346768 = product of:
  0.008173384 = sum of:
    0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008173384 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  9. Svenonius, E.: Indexical contents (1982) 0.00 
    0.0016346768 = product of:
  0.008173384 = sum of:
    0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008173384 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  10. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00 
    0.0016346768 = product of:
  0.008173384 = sum of:
    0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008173384 = score(doc=5599,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Type
    a
  11. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00 
    0.0016346768 = product of:
  0.008173384 = sum of:
    0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008173384 = score(doc=5602,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Type
    a
  12. Svenonius, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities (1992) 0.00 
    0.001541188 = product of:
  0.00770594 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=2084,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Classification research at any point in time is the resultant product of various philosophical, technological, social, economic, and political forces. This address attemps first to give a partial description of the present state of classification research as determined by one of these forces: philosophy, in particular the 20th century analytic philosophies of logical positivism, linguistic analysis and systems analysis; and, second, assuming the continued influence of these, to speculate upon the future of classification research in terms of its prospects, problems and possibilities
    Type
    a
  13. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic entities and their uses (2018) 0.00 
    0.0013622305 = product of:
  0.0068111527 = sum of:
    0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068111527 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  14. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.00 
    8.173384E-4 = product of:
  0.004086692 = sum of:
    0.004086692 = weight(_text_:a in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004086692 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  15. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00 
    8.173384E-4 = product of:
  0.004086692 = sum of:
    0.004086692 = weight(_text_:a in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004086692 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 34
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 33
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications