Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tuominen, K."
  • × author_ss:"Savolainen, R."
  1. Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R.: ¬A social constructionist approach to the study of information use as discursive action (1997) 0.01
    0.012018337 = product of:
      0.030045843 = sum of:
        0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012184162 = score(doc=304,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
        0.017861681 = product of:
          0.035723362 = sum of:
            0.035723362 = weight(_text_:information in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035723362 = score(doc=304,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a study of information seeking behaviour and information use viewed from the social constructionist viewpoint. Introduces social constructionism and presents a social constructionist critique of previous research into information use. Reviews generally the nature of discursive action and its analysis and focuses on the principle issue of information use as a discursive action
    Source
    Information seeking in context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 14-16 August 1996, Tampere, Finland. Ed.: P. Vakkari u.a
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  2. Talja, S.; Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R.: "Isms" in information science : constructivism, collectivism and constructionism (2005) 0.01
    0.0077237748 = product of:
      0.019309437 = sum of:
        0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008258085 = score(doc=4412,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=4412,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Describes the basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism. Design/methodology/approach - Presents a literature-based conceptual analysis. Pinpoints the differences between the positions in their conceptions of language and the nature and origin of knowledge. Findings - Each of the three metatheories addresses and solves specific types of research questions and design problems. The metatheories thus complement one another. Each of the three metatheories encourages and constitutes a distinctive type of research and learning. Originality/value - Outlines each metatheory's specific fields of application.
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a