Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weller, K."
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Mainz, I.; Weller, K.; Paulsen, I.; Mainz, D.; Kohl, J.; Haeseler, A. von: Ontoverse : collaborative ontology engineering for the life sciences (2008) 0.08
    0.084764846 = product of:
      0.14127474 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=1594,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
        0.12725374 = weight(_text_:91 in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12725374 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.49251786 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.91-99
    Type
    a
  2. Weller, K.: Ontologien (2013) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=715)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
    Type
    a
  3. Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.00
    0.00326269 = product of:
      0.008156725 = sum of:
        0.0033713488 = weight(_text_:a in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033713488 = score(doc=4515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.06305726 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
        0.004785376 = product of:
          0.009570752 = sum of:
            0.009570752 = weight(_text_:information in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009570752 = score(doc=4515,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.11757882 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this book is to sum up the vital and highly topical research issue of knowledge representation on the Web and to discuss novel solutions by combining benefits of folksonomies and Web 2.0 approaches with ontologies and semantic technologies. This book contains an overview of knowledge representation approaches in past, present and future, introduction to ontologies, Web indexing and in first case the novel approaches of developing ontologies. This title combines aspects of knowledge representation for both the Semantic Web (ontologies) and the Web 2.0 (folksonomies). Currently there is no monographic book which provides a combined overview over these topics. focus on the topic of using knowledge representation methods for document indexing purposes. For this purpose, considerations from classical librarian interests in knowledge representation (thesauri, classification schemes etc.) are included, which are not part of most other books which have a stronger background in computer science.
    LCSH
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Series
    Knowledge and information; vol.3
    Subject
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
  4. Weller, K.: Kooperativer Ontologieaufbau (2006) 0.00
    0.0019071229 = product of:
      0.009535614 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Weller, K.: Kooperativer Ontologieaufbau (2006) 0.00
    0.0019071229 = product of:
      0.009535614 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Weller, K.; Peters, I.: Reconsidering relationships for knowledge representation (2007) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=216,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Classical knowledge representation methods traditionally work with established relations such as synonymy, hierarchy and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently utilized in elaborated knowledge representation methods and which may be inherently hidden in folksonomies and ontologies.
    Type
    a
  7. Weller, K.: Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.00
    9.5356145E-4 = product of:
      0.004767807 = sum of:
        0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004767807 = score(doc=4061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Weller, K.: Ontologien: Stand und Entwicklung der Semantik für WorldWideWeb (2009) 0.00
    7.893822E-4 = product of:
      0.003946911 = sum of:
        0.003946911 = product of:
          0.007893822 = sum of:
            0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007893822 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Idee zu einem semantischen Web wurde maßgeblich geprägt (wenn auch nicht initiiert) durch eine Veröffentlichung von Tim Berners Lee, James Hendler und Ora Lassila im Jahre 2001. Darin skizzieren die Autoren ihre Version von einem erweiterten und verbesserten World Wide Web: Daten sollen so aufbereitet werden, dass nicht nur Menschen diese lesen können, sondern dass auch Computer in die Lage versetzt werden, diese zu verarbeiten und sinnvoll zu kombinieren. Sie beschreiben ein Szenario, in dem "Web agents" dem Nutzer bei der Durchführung komplexer Suchanfragen helfen, wie beispielsweise "finde einen Arzt, der eine bestimmte Behandlung anbietet, dessen Praxis in der Nähe meiner Wohnung liegt und dessen Öffnungszeiten mit meinem Terminkalender zusammenpassen". Die große Herausforderung liegt hierbei darin, dass Informationen, die über mehrere Webseiten verteilt sind, gesammelt und zu einer sinnvollen Antwort kombiniert werden müssen. Man spricht dabei vom Problem der Informationsintegration (Information Integration). Diese Vision der weltweiten Datenintegration in einem Semantic Web wurde seither vielfach diskutiert, erweitert und modifiziert, an der technischen Realisation arbeitet eine Vielzahl verschiedener Forschungseinrichtungen. Einigkeit besteht dahingehend, dass eine solche Idee nur mit der Hilfe neuer bedeutungstragender Metadaten verwirklicht werden kann. Benötigt werden also neue Ansätze zur Indexierung von Web Inhalten, die eine Suche über Wortbedeutungen und nicht über bloße Zeichenketten ermöglichen können. So soll z.B. erkannt werden, dass es sich bei "Heinrich Heine" um den Namen einer Person handelt und bei "Düsseldorf" um den Namen einer Stadt. Darüber hinaus sollen auch Verbindungen zwischen einzelnen Informationseinheiten festgehalten werden, beispielsweise dass Heinrich Heine in Düsseldorf wohnte. Wenn solche semantischen Relationen konsequent eingesetzt werden, können sie in vielen Fällen ausgenutzt werden, um neue Schlussfolgerungen zu ziehen.