Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"025.4/7"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Functional requirements for subject authority data (FRSAD) : a conceptual model (2011) 0.01
    0.007848554 = product of:
      0.019621385 = sum of:
        0.012923255 = weight(_text_:a in 2880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012923255 = score(doc=2880,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.24171482 = fieldWeight in 2880, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2880)
        0.0066981306 = product of:
          0.013396261 = sum of:
            0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 2880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013396261 = score(doc=2880,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2880, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of authority control is to ensure consistency in representing a value - a name of a person, a place name, or a term or code representing a subject - in the elements used as access points in information retrieval. The primary purpose of this study is to produce a framework that will provide a clearly stated and commonly shared understanding of what the subject authority data/record/file aims to provide information about, and the expectation of what such data should achieve in terms of answering user needs.
    Editor
    Zeng, M.L., M. Zumer u. A. Salaba
  2. Golub, K.: Subject access to information : an interdisciplinary approach (2015) 0.01
    0.0073182294 = product of:
      0.018295573 = sum of:
        0.004086692 = weight(_text_:a in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004086692 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
        0.014208881 = product of:
          0.028417762 = sum of:
            0.028417762 = weight(_text_:information in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028417762 = score(doc=134,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Drawing on the research of experts from the fields of computing and library science, this ground-breaking work will show you how to combine two very different approaches to classification to create more effective, user-friendly information-retrieval systems. * Provides an interdisciplinary overview of current and potential approaches to organizing information by subject * Covers both pure computer science and pure library science topics in easy-to-understand language accessible to audiences from both disciplines * Reviews technological standards for representation, storage, and retrieval of varied knowledge-organization systems and their constituent elements * Suggests a collaborative approach that will reduce duplicate efforts and make it easier to find solutions to practical problems.
    Content
    Organizing information by subjectKnowledge organization systems (KOSs) -- Technological standards -- Automated tools for subject information organization : selected topics -- Perspectives for the future.
    LCSH
    Information organization
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Subject
    Information organization
    Information storage and retrieval systems
  3. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012) 0.00
    9.5356145E-4 = product of:
      0.004767807 = sum of:
        0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004767807 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)