Search (61 results, page 2 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Huang, M.-h.: Factors affecting relevance judgement : a preliminary study (1998) 0.01 
    0.0068851607 = product of:
  0.017212901 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=926,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=926)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Attempts to investigate situational variables which can affect the results of relevance judgements, including computer experience, search experience, familiarity with search topic, preparation time, research objecttives, and research stages. The results show only the search experience will affect relevance judgements. Concerning research objectives, students writing term papers yield less relevance odds but a higher precision rate. concerning research stage, searchers in the early research stage yield more relevance odds and a higher precision rate
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1998) no.3, S.39-50
    Type
    a
  2. Meng, L.: ¬The creation of [the] Chinese Science Citation Database : status quo and future development (1997) 0.01 
    0.006654713 = product of:
  0.016636781 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=954,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
    0.0089308405 = product of:
      0.017861681 = sum of:
        0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017861681 = score(doc=954,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) is a significant document database on mainland China, which has been built up by the Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Briefly introduces the background to CSCD, and discusses in detail its development and application, source journals and citation data, data processing methods, subject scope, compilation regulations, stylistic rules and layout, and usage directions for both the printed and CD-ROM editions of CSCD which have been published from the data
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.4, S.39-54
    Type
    a
  3. Wu, C.-J.: Experiments on using the Dublin Core to reduce the retrieval error ratio (1998) 0.01 
    0.00652538 = product of:
  0.01631345 = sum of:
    0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0067426977 = score(doc=5201,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
    0.009570752 = product of:
      0.019141505 = sum of:
        0.019141505 = weight(_text_:information in 5201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019141505 = score(doc=5201,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5201, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In order to test the power of metadata on information retrieval, an experiment was designed and conducted on a group of 7 graduate students using the Dublin Core as the cataloguing metadata. Results show that, on average, the retrieval error rate is only 2.9 per cent for the MES system (http://140.136.85.194), which utilizes the Dublin Core to describe the documents on the World Wide Web, in contrast to 20.7 per cent for the 7 famous search engines including HOTBOT, GAIS, LYCOS, EXCITE, INFOSEEK, YAHOO, and OCTOPUS. The very low error rate indicates that the users can use the information of the Dublin Core to decide whether to retrieve the documents or not
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 24(1998) no.1, S.50-64
    Type
    a
  4. Huang, Y.-L.: ¬A theoretic and empirical research of cluster indexing for Mandarine Chinese full text document (1998) 0.01 
    0.006474727 = product of:
  0.016186817 = sum of:
    0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010661141 = score(doc=513,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
    0.005525676 = product of:
      0.011051352 = sum of:
        0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011051352 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Since most popular commercialized systems for full text retrieval are designed with full text scaning and Boolean logic query mode, these systems use an oversimplified relationship between the indexing form and the content of document. Reports the use of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to develop a Cluster Indexing Model (CIM) based on a Vector Space Model (VSM) in orer to explore the index theory of cluster indexing for chinese full text documents. From a series of experiments, it was found that the indexing performance of CIM is better than traditional VSM, and has almost equivalent effectiveness of the authority control of index terms
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.24, S.44-68
    Type
    a
  5. Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997) 0.01 
    0.0064290287 = product of:
  0.016072571 = sum of:
    0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008258085 = score(doc=1830,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
    0.007814486 = product of:
      0.015628971 = sum of:
        0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015628971 = score(doc=1830,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Automatic keyword extraction is an important and fundamental technology in an advanced information retrieval systems. Briefly compares several major keyword extraction methods, lists their advantages and disadvantages, and reports recent research progress in Taiwan. Also describes the application of a keyword extraction algorithm in an information retrieval system for relevance feedback. Preliminary analysis shows that the error rate of extracting relevant keywords is 18%, and that the precision rate is over 50%. The main disadvantage of this approach is that the extraction results depend on the retrieval results, which in turn depend on the data held by the database. Apart from collecting more data, this problem can be alleviated by the application of a thesaurus constructed by the same keyword extraction algorithm
    Type
    a
  6. Jianchao, X.; Ming, H.; Milin, S.: On indexing descriptors for document archive (1998) 0.01 
    0.0063011474 = product of:
  0.015752869 = sum of:
    0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009437811 = score(doc=3567,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=3567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes a method of indexing the descriptors of the full text of document archives. Explains how the method organizes the thesaurus of descriptors, and mixes both keyword and index terms from the thesaurus. Presents a procedure for weighting descriptors and discusses the technical issues involved
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.4, S.263-265
    Type
    a
  7. Hou, H.; Chen, S.: ¬The integration of Chinese classification and thesaurus : its progress and technical features (1996) 0.01 
    0.00588199 = product of:
  0.014704974 = sum of:
    0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 2319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068111527 = score(doc=2319,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2319, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2319)
    0.007893822 = product of:
      0.015787644 = sum of:
        0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 2319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015787644 = score(doc=2319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1996, no.19, S.48-63
    Type
    a
  8. Xiong, L.J.: On the compiling of cataloguing rules for Chinese document(s) (1997) 0.01 
    0.00588199 = product of:
  0.014704974 = sum of:
    0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068111527 = score(doc=3199,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
    0.007893822 = product of:
      0.015787644 = sum of:
        0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 3199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015787644 = score(doc=3199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.1, S.32-37
    Type
    a
  9. Yongcheng, W.; Xiaoming, G.; Lixia, W.: Automatic indexing on subject of Chinese text (1998) 0.01 
    0.00588199 = product of:
  0.014704974 = sum of:
    0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068111527 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
    0.007893822 = product of:
      0.015787644 = sum of:
        0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015787644 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.219-225
    Type
    a
  10. Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998) 0.01 
    0.0057805413 = product of:
  0.014451353 = sum of:
    0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076151006 = score(doc=5159,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
    0.006836252 = product of:
      0.013672504 = sum of:
        0.013672504 = weight(_text_:information in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013672504 = score(doc=5159,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    One of the major causes of search failures in information retrieval systems is vocabulary mismatch. Presents a solution to the vocabulary problem through 2 strategies known as term suggestion (TS) and term relevance feedback (TRF). In TS, collection specific terms are extracted from the text collection. These terms and their frequencies constitute the keyword database for suggesting terms in response to users' queries. One effect of this term suggestion is that it functions as a dynamic directory if the query is a general term that contains broad meaning. In term relevance feedback, terms extracted from the top ranked documents retrieved from the previous query are shown to users for relevance feedback. In the experiment, interactive TS provides very high precision rates while achieving similar recall rates as n-gram matching. Local TRF achieves improvement in both precision and recall rate in a full text news database and degrades slightly in recall rate in bibliographic databases due to the very limited source of information for feedback. In terms of Rijsbergen's combined measure of recall and precision, both TS and TRF achieve better performance than n-gram matching, which implies that the greater improvement in precision rate compensates the slight degradation in recall rate for TS and TRF
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 24(1998) no.1, S.1-18
    Type
    a
  11. Cheng, L.-y.: On bibliographic(al) control (1998) 0.01 
    0.005751905 = product of:
  0.014379762 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
    0.0089308405 = product of:
      0.017861681 = sum of:
        0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017861681 = score(doc=3376,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic(al) control is important for retrieving documents in the library. Reviews previous studies in order to understand bibliographic(al) control from its very beginnings up to the present information age. The history, meaning, scope and functions of bibliographic(al) control are included. Finally, various catalogues are reviewed and discussed
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1998) no.3, S.58-67
    Type
    a
  12. Huang, M.-h.: End-users' searching behaviour : changes in search type over time (1996) 0.01 
    0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Identifies 6 types of searches on the basis of paudsing behaviour by using cluster analysis. The 6 types of search were highly associated with search fleuncy and the construction of a mental model. Examines learning during multiple searches on the basis of the 6 types. Finds that searchers gain more experience, increase their searching proficiency and become more fluent at searching while online. The changes of search level in multiple searches showed that most searchers moved towards greater fleuncy
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1996, no.16, S.7-20
    Type
    a
  13. Huang, S.-l.: Data structure and searching strategy (1995) 0.01 
    0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=157,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study of the effectiveness of online searching which used TULIPS, the National Taiwan University's OPAC system, to examine the relationship between data structure and information retrieval systems. Results show the efficiency of online searching can be improved by the use of indexes and by searching by subject
    Type
    a
  14. Chen, P.: ¬The access to Internet : an explorative study (1997) 0.01 
    0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=522,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 522, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=522)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=522)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses access to the Internet. Although the number of Internet users has increased since 1993, the technology is still unavailable to many. High income, highly educated people are more easily able to access new media than those who are less well off. Such a knowledge gap may contribute more to social disparity in future. To ensure that most people have access to computer networks, future national policy should move from universal service to universal access. Network policy should offer not only to make networks available to all but also to ansure people's ability to access the content
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.20, S.1-12
    Type
    a
  15. Li, Z.: Research on dynamic morphological indexing (1998) 0.01 
    0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=3242,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=3242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Notes that in automatic indexing of Chinese words using dictionary matching methods, there is some difficulty in the indexing of proper nouns. Presents a solution called dynamic morphological indexing, based on work using automatic indexing of archive documents. Presents the algorithm for this solution
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.3, S.226-229
    Type
    a
  16. Xiulan, H.: Research into the progress of citations for Chinese scientific and technical literature (1998) 0.01 
    0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 5119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=5119,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5119, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5119)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 5119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=5119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes a study in which 6505 papers from 23 Chinese scientific and technical journals published in the 7 years from 1990 to 1996 were investigated. The quantity, languages and types of citations were analyzed and compared with data from the 1970s. In this way the progress of citations for Chinese scientific and technical journal literature can be seen
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.6, S.467-473
    Type
    a
  17. Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997) 0.01 
    0.005513504 = product of:
  0.01378376 = sum of:
    0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008258085 = score(doc=657,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
    0.005525676 = product of:
      0.011051352 = sum of:
        0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011051352 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Investigates the characteristics of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) through the study of the Science Citation Index (SCI). Other criteria for evaluating a journal are also discussed. The compilation process of SCI data, and the characteristics, applications and limitations of SCI are studied. A detailed description of JCR is provided including: journal ranking listing, citing journal listing, cited journal listing, subject category listing, source data, impact factor, immediacy index, cited half-life and citing half-life. The applications and limitations of JCR are also explored. In addition to the criteria listed in JCR, the size, circulation and influence of journals are also considered significant criteria fir evaluation purposes
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.27-41
    Type
    a
  18. Liu, H.-M.C.: Selection and comparison of WWW search tools (1996) 0.00 
    0.0047055925 = product of:
  0.011763981 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1996) no.4, S.41-63
    Type
    a
  19. Chang, H.-C.: Introduction to the fifth edition of National Library of Medicine Classification (1998) 0.00 
    0.0047055925 = product of:
  0.011763981 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=3234,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=3234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.25, S.6-15
    Type
    a
  20. Lin, Z.; Baoming, Z.: Comparative study of WWW search tools (1998) 0.00 
    0.0047055925 = product of:
  0.011763981 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.4, S.273-280
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Themes