Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Clavel, G.; Walther, F.; Walther, J.: Indexation automatique de fonds bibliotheconomiques (1993) 0.05

0.04958458 = product of:
  0.12396145 = sum of:
    0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 6610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012614433 = score(doc=6610,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6610, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6610)
    0.11134702 = weight(_text_:91 in 6610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11134702 = score(doc=6610,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.43095312 = fieldWeight in 6610, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6610)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract: A discussion of developments to date in the field of computerized indexing, based on presentations given at a seminar held at the Institute of Policy Studies in Paris in Nov 91. The methods tested so far, based on a linguistic approach, whether using natural language or special thesauri, encounter the same central problem - they are only successful when applied to collections of similar types of documents covering very specific subject areas. Despite this, the search for some sort of universal indexing metalanguage continues. In the end, computerized indexing works best when used in conjunction with manual indexing - ideally in the hands of a trained library science professional, who can extract the maximum value from a collection of documents for a particular user population
Type: a

Polity, Y.: Vers une ergonomie linguistique (1994) 0.01

0.009423484 = product of:
  0.02355871 = sum of:
    0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009437811 = score(doc=36,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
    0.014120899 = product of:
      0.028241798 = sum of:
        0.028241798 = weight(_text_:information in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028241798 = score(doc=36,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract: Analyzed a special type of man-mchine interaction, that of searching an information system with natural language. A model for full text processing for information retrieval was proposed that considered the system's users and how they employ information. Describes how INIST (the National Institute for Scientific and Technical Information) is developing computer assisted indexing as an aid to improving relevance when retrieving information from bibliographic data banks
Type: a

Faraj, N.: Analyse d'une methode d'indexation automatique basée sur une analyse syntaxique de texte (1996) 0.01

0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=685,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract: Evaluates an automatic indexing method based on syntactical text analysis combined with statistical analysis. Tests many combinations for the choice of term categories and weighting methods. The experiment, conducted on a software engineering corpus, shows systematic improvement in the use of syntactic term phrases compared to using only individual words as index terms
Source: Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.1, S.1-21
Type: a

Chevallet, J.-P.; Bruandet, M.F.: Impact de l'utilisation de multi terms sur la qualité des résponses dùn système de recherche d'information a indexation automatique (1999) 0.01

0.0056083994 = product of:
  0.014020998 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=6253,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 6253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=6253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Footnote: Übers. d. Titels: Impact of the use of multi-terms on the quality of the answers of an information retrieval system based on automatic indexing
Type: a

Fournier, A.: ¬Les enjeux de l'indexation automatisée (1994) 0.00

0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989) 0.00
```
0.0021322283 = product of:
  0.010661141 = sum of:
    0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010661141 = score(doc=3516,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Report of a study comparing 2 methods of indexing: LEXINET, a computerised system for indexing titles and summaries only; and manual indexing of full texts, using the thesaurus developed by French Electricity (EDF). Both systems were applied to a collection of approximately 2.000 documents on artifical intelligence from the EDF data base. The results were then analysed to compare quantitative performance (number and range of terms) and qualitative performance (ambiguity of terms, specificity, variability, consistency). Overall, neither system proved ideal: LEXINET was deficient as regards lack of accessibility and excessive ambiguity; while the manual system gave rise to an over-wide variation of terms. The ideal system would appear to be a combination of automatic and manual systems, on the evidence produced here.

Type

a

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes