Lavallee, C.: Indexation manuelle et indexation assistee par ordinateur : comparison de la performance de deux index d'une monographie (1996)
0.01
0.009338933 = product of:
0.023347333 = sum of:
0.0144164935 = weight(_text_:a in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144164935 = score(doc=740,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reports an experiment, conducted in Mar 95 in the context of a course at the School of Library and Information Science at the University of Montreal, which evaluates the information retrieval capabilities of a manual index and a semi automated index developed according to the Bennion method. The application of a formula developed by Bennion shows that the indexes are almost identical
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Manual and automated indexing: a comparison of the performance of 2 indexes of a monograph
- Type
- a
