Search (85 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017) 0.00 
    0.004303226 = product of:
  0.010758064 = sum of:
    0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0068111527 = score(doc=4138,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
    0.003946911 = product of:
      0.007893822 = sum of:
        0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007893822 = score(doc=4138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
    Type
    a
  2. Herm, S.; Kaiser, R.: ¬Der moderne Lesesaal (2008) 0.00 
    0.0041173934 = product of:
  0.010293484 = sum of:
    0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 2325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004767807 = score(doc=2325,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2325, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2325)
    0.005525676 = product of:
      0.011051352 = sum of:
        0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 2325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011051352 = score(doc=2325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Lesesäle haben heute einen schweren Stand. Waren sie früher wichtigster Bestandteil der Bibliothek, so führt die zunehmende Digitalisierung der Information auch zur räumlichen Zergliederung der Bibliothek. Der Lesesaal kann nicht mehr als Zentrum fungieren, wenn er nicht mehr alle wichtigen Dienstleistungen vereinen kann. Die Einrichtung einzelner Facharbeitsräume werde einem großen Hauptlesesaal vorgezogen. Arbeitsräume unterschiedlicher Ausrichtung veteilen sich auf die ganze Bibliothek. Dennoch ist es möglich, den Lesesaal als Lern- und Nutzungszentrum in der wissenschaftlichen Bibliothek zu etablieren. Dazu ist vor allem eine Reaktion auf den technischen Fortschritt und die Anforderungen des modernen wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens nötig. Wichtig ist, dass das Konzept nicht die ferne Zukunft zum Ziel hat. Die Konzeption soll in der beschriebenen Form aktuell anwendbar sein. Die geschlderte modernen Technik soll keinesfalls nur Technik-Profis vorbehalten bleiben, sondern für alle nutzbar sein.
    Type
    a
  3. De Gaetano, M.A.: Looking at the library, seeing philosophy (Trieste, Italy) (2009) 0.00 
    0.0039382176 = product of:
  0.009845544 = sum of:
    0.005898632 = weight(_text_:a in 3272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005898632 = score(doc=3272,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 3272, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3272)
    0.003946911 = product of:
      0.007893822 = sum of:
        0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 3272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007893822 = score(doc=3272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on the job undertaken between 2003 and 2004 in order to plan a new location arrangement for the Philosophy collection of one of the libraries at the University of Trieste. The paper describes the basic needs which played a fundamental role in the planning phase. Furthermore, it examines in detail how the most widely known classification systems - particularly the DDC- did not seem the best answer to the specific needs in this context. The solution was to develop an original classification system in order to answer the specific needs. The paper describes its development and the basis upon which it was built: the classification schemes used were those of the most authoritative periodical bibliographies in this field. Among them, the International Philosophical Bibliography system seemed to be closer to the continental tradition of the organization of knowledge in the discipline. Conclusions deal with the management of the transition from the old to the new system giving some information about the possible evaluation of the work that has been carried out.
    Type
    a
  4. Pfeffer, M.; Schöllhorn, K.: Praktische Nutzung von Klassifikationssystemen (2018) 0.00 
    0.003529194 = product of:
  0.008822985 = sum of:
    0.004086692 = weight(_text_:a in 3131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004086692 = score(doc=3131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3131)
    0.0047362936 = product of:
      0.009472587 = sum of:
        0.009472587 = weight(_text_:information in 3131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009472587 = score(doc=3131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Ist der Medienbestand einer Informationseinrichtung klassifikatorisch erschlossen, kann diese Information auf vielfältige Weise verwendet werden: Die hierarchische Struktur eines Klassifikationssystems kann mit Hilfe eines geeigneten Notationssystems als Basis für die Signaturvergabe genutzt werden und so die Anordnung der physischen Medien in Regalen inhaltlich strukturieren. In Katalogen und anderen Suchsystemen dienen Klassifikationssysteme als systematischer Zugang, zur inhaltlichen Eingrenzung von Treffermengen oder als Hilfsmittel, um thematisch verwandte Medien zu einem vorhandenen Medium zu finden. Etliche Visualisierungsmethoden bauen ebenfalls auf hierarchischen Strukturen von Klassifikationssystemen auf und können für eine Analyse der inhaltlichen Zusammensetzung von (Teil-)Beständen oder Treffermengen eingesetzt werden. In diesem Kapitel werden diese unterschiedlichen Anwendungsgebiete vorgestellt und anhand von Beispielen aus der Praxis erläutert.
    Type
    a
  5. Orvig, M.: ¬The reader interest arrangement : an american shelving system with a future (1955) 0.00 
    0.003082376 = product of:
  0.01541188 = sum of:
    0.01541188 = weight(_text_:a in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01541188 = score(doc=5263,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  6. Molloy, C.G.; Wollschläger, T.: Imagebildung in der Bibliothek : Konzeption eines Leit- und Orientierungssystems (2000) 0.00 
    0.002940995 = product of:
  0.007352487 = sum of:
    0.0034055763 = weight(_text_:a in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034055763 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
    0.003946911 = product of:
      0.007893822 = sum of:
        0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 5525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007893822 = score(doc=5525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5525)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information und Öffentlichkeit: 1. Gemeinsamer Kongress der Bundesvereinigung Deutscher Bibliotheksverbände e.V. (BDB) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI), Leipzig, 20.-23.3.2000. Zugleich 90. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, 52. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. (DGI). Hrsg.: G. Ruppelt u. H. Neißer
    Type
    a
  7. Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985) 0.00 
    0.0025260232 = product of:
  0.012630116 = sum of:
    0.012630116 = product of:
      0.025260232 = sum of:
        0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025260232 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Imprint
    Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  8. Losee, R.M.: ¬The relative shelf location of circulated books : a study of classification, users, and browsing (1993) 0.00 
    0.0025228865 = product of:
  0.012614433 = sum of:
    0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012614433 = score(doc=4485,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Patrons often browse through books organized by a library classification system, looking for books to use and possibly circulate. This research is an examination of the clustering of similar books provided by a classification system and ways in which the books that patrons circulate are clustered. Measures of classification system performance are suggested and used to evaluate two test collections. Regression formulas are derived describing the relationships among the number of areas in which books were found (the number of stops a patron makes when browsing), the distances across a cluster, and the average number of books a patron circulates. Patrons were found usually to make more stops than there were books found at their average stop. Consequences for full-text document systems and online catalogs are suggested
    Type
    a
  9. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.00 
    0.0024520152 = product of:
  0.012260076 = sum of:
    0.012260076 = weight(_text_:a in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012260076 = score(doc=340,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    For a variety of reasons, reclassification was a popular project in libraries in the 1960s. Although such projects have faded from the limelight, some of the reasons for doing them remain valid today, i.e., a need to cut processing costs, participation in cooperative ventures, the inconvenience caused by working with a collection split between two classification systems, and continuing changes in the Dewey schedules. This article compares the steps needed for reclassifying in a manual environment with those required when the library has an in-house computer system. The comparison shows how using the latter makes a reclassification project more feasible than it would be in a totally manual library. The article also discusses various issues associated with reclassification in an automated environment such as the problem posed by a frozen public catalog and the combining of reclassification and conversion projects.
    Type
    a
  10. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.00 
    0.0024520152 = product of:
  0.012260076 = sum of:
    0.012260076 = weight(_text_:a in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012260076 = score(doc=787,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents a new idea on shelving printed books and finding books in libraries. The author advocates that traditional book classification number (TBCN) systems should be replaced by a better indexing method for books in libraries. The author proposes a new way of seeking books for library users wishing to locate them called a 'dynamic book subject number' (DBSN) system. The new system combines new indexing rules and automated system technology to create settings in which a book's 'subject number' can change rather than having a particular permanent classification number assigned to it. The new way encourages library users to seek books through a user-friendly cataloging system by choosing subjects from the embedded database. The database contains thousands of subjects with their corresponding Arabic codes. For printed books, the DBSN ushers in a new era in the relationship between library users and the books.
    Type
    a
  11. Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : summary of a documentary and opinion survey on the direct shelf approach and browsing (1971) 0.00 
    0.002311782 = product of:
  0.01155891 = sum of:
    0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01155891 = score(doc=2428,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  12. Oberhauser, O.; Seidler, W.: Von der Haussystematik zur Verbundklassifikation? : Möglichkeiten für die Reklassifizierung der Bestände einer grossen Fachbibliothek (2000) 0.00 
    0.002311782 = product of:
  0.01155891 = sum of:
    0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01155891 = score(doc=4907,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  13. Busch, R.: Neue Wege der Buchaufstellung in den USA (1956) 0.00 
    0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  14. Leyh, G.: Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung? (1914) 0.00 
    0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=2894,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2894, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2894)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  15. Martínez-Ávila, D.: Reader interest classifications : an alternative arrangement for libraries (2017) 0.00 
    0.002002062 = product of:
  0.0100103095 = sum of:
    0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0100103095 = score(doc=3626,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and common characteristics in the knowledge organization literature for more than half a century. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. The use of reader-interest classification related terms and references drastically declined since 1995, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day such as those of implementation of BISAC in American public libraries. The present paper attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
    Type
    a
  16. Formierungen von Wissensräumen : Optionen des Zugangs zu Information und Bildung (2014) 0.00 
    0.0019141504 = product of:
  0.009570752 = sum of:
    0.009570752 = product of:
      0.019141505 = sum of:
        0.019141505 = weight(_text_:information in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019141505 = score(doc=1698,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In der Debatte um die Wissensgesellschaft werden räumliche Aspekte der Zugänglichkeit zu Information oft vernachlässigt, auch wenn anerkannt ist, dass Zugang nicht nur durch technischen Anschluss gewährleistet ist. Dieser Band lotet aus Sicht von Wissenschaft, Architektur und Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis aus, welchen Beitrag Institutionen der räumlich gebundenen Informationsvermittlung zur öffentlichen Zugänglichkeit von Information leisten.
  17. Leyh, G.: ¬Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung : T.2 (1913) 0.00 
    0.0019071229 = product of:
  0.009535614 = sum of:
    0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009535614 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  18. Leyh, G.: Aufstellung und Signaturen (1961) 0.00 
    0.0019071229 = product of:
  0.009535614 = sum of:
    0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009535614 = score(doc=2055,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2055, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2055)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  19. LeBlanc, J.: Classification and shelflisting as value added : some remarks on the relative worth and price of predictibility, serendipity, and depth of access (1995) 0.00 
    0.0019071229 = product of:
  0.009535614 = sum of:
    0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009535614 = score(doc=3667,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    There seems to be general agreement in the library community that a predictably ordered system of classification, leading to easy browsability of a library collection either in the stacks or in an OPAC, is an indispensible requirement for the kind of access patrons have come to expect, and for the reasonable success of the searching strategies they normally use. In this vein, examines the intrinsic value of browsing. In addition, with the help of some rough data compiled during a test conducted at Cornell University in the spring of 1994, estimates the cost of maintaining the collocative and alphabetical integrity of shelflist files for works by or about individual literary authors
    Type
    a
  20. Massey, S.A.; Malinconico, S.M.: Cutting cataloging costs : accepting LC Classification call numbers from OCLC cataloging copy (1997) 0.00 
    0.0019071229 = product of:
  0.009535614 = sum of:
    0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009535614 = score(doc=507,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Cataloging policy at the Alabama University Libraries allows the acceptance of LCC call numbers from OCLC cataloguing copy into the local database without shelflisting. Reports results of a study to measure error rates for locally unshelflisted samples and a control group of locally assigned and shelflisted call numbers to determine whether this policy produces disarrangement of the local online shelflist. Results show no significant differences between samples, indicating that the cataloguer's task of local shelflisting is not a cost effective use of their time. Analysis of the error data suggests that the types of disorder created by shelflisting errors would not impede the retrieval of items while subject browsing, but further study is needed to confirm this
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 39
  • nl 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications