Search (131 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hannabuss, S.: Information ethics : a contemporary challenge for professionals and the community (1998) 0.08
    0.07994305 = product of:
      0.13323842 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=1602,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
        0.11134702 = weight(_text_:91 in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11134702 = score(doc=1602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.43095312 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
        0.012355788 = product of:
          0.024711575 = sum of:
            0.024711575 = weight(_text_:information in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024711575 = score(doc=1602,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Acting ethically presents challenges to professional people in an age where there is little consensus on moral beliefs and where competitive practices are increasingly commonplace in the workplace. Professionals dealing with information face particular challenges since information is often regarded as a public good, freely available to everyone as part of a free society. However, information can also be sensitive, confidential and wrong. The dilemmas which arise in this professional area are examined with reference to the wider and deeper ethical issues involved.
    Footnote
    Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
    Source
    Library review. 47(1998) no./2, S.91-98
    Type
    a
  2. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.03
    0.031033238 = product of:
      0.0775831 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
        0.072134174 = sum of:
          0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021876005 = score(doc=3027,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050258167 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Within the looming threat of the combination of computer databases with monitoring and surveillance devices, attempts to define the notion of privacy and its parameters. Considers the ethical issues posed by databases, touching on disclosure to organizations of matters such as personal taxation and financial information or security surveillance. Highlights the increasing information imbalance between persons and organizations and suggests ways to improve autonomy
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.42-48
    Type
    a
  3. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.03
    0.029427508 = product of:
      0.07356877 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
        0.06811985 = sum of:
          0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017861681 = score(doc=6063,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050258167 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden verschiedene Aspekte einer Begründung einer Informationsethik betrachtet. Zunächst wird eine sinnvolle Abgrenzung zu konkurrierenden Ethiken - Netz- und Medienethik - gesucht. Aus Sicht der Generierung, Distribution und Bewahrung von Information wird die Informationsethik als umfassender und allgemeiner als die anderen angesehen. Weiterhin wird die Option einer diskursethischen und damit absoluten Begründung der Informationsethik diskutiert und zugunsten einer pragmatistischen Sichtweise zurückgewiesen.
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
    Source
    Information und Sprache: Beiträge zu Informationswissenschaft, Computerlinguistik, Bibliothekswesen und verwandten Fächern. Festschrift für Harald H. Zimmermann. Herausgegeben von Ilse Harms, Heinz-Dirk Luckhardt und Hans W. Giessen
    Type
    a
  4. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.03
    0.02823769 = product of:
      0.07059422 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=248,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
        0.06288828 = sum of:
          0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012630116 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050258167 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Having reached the US Supreme Court in 1997, the Communications Decency Act (1996) has strong implications for Internet service providers. How to protect children while not denying adult rights of access is an issue which has impacted successively upon motion pictures, reading materials, radio, television and cable. The case for freedom of electronic speech appears compelling. The problems of obscenity, encryption (cryptography) and provocative 'cyberspeech' on the Internet offers a field day for litigation
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
    Source
    Journal of information ethics. 7(1998) no.1, S.15-23
    Type
    a
  5. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.03
    0.025314135 = product of:
      0.063285336 = sum of:
        0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008258085 = score(doc=2453,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
        0.05502725 = sum of:
          0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011051352 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.043975897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043975897 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    An awareness exists among Italian librarians of the need for an established code of ethics for library reference services. Considers the principles that such a code should incorporate; the US Commitment to Information services, for example, affirms users' rights of access to library books and resources, regardless of content and opinions expressed. Censoship is opposed and people are not barred from library use for ethnis, social or religious reasons. An ethical code would require library staff to be impartial, give attention and respect to users, allocate time properly, and avoid prejudice. Discusses the problems of library ethics which arise when user requests relate to sensitive topics e.g. euthansia, cocaine refining
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
    Type
    a
  6. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.02
    0.020634085 = product of:
      0.051585212 = sum of:
        0.009010308 = weight(_text_:a in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009010308 = score(doc=1868,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
        0.042574905 = sum of:
          0.011163551 = weight(_text_:information in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011163551 = score(doc=1868,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces a normative principle for the behavior of contemporary computing and communication systems and considers some of its consequences. The principle, named the principle of distribution, says that in a distributed multi-agent system, control resides as much as possible with the individuals constituting the system rather than in centralized agents; and when that is unfeasible or becomes inappropriate due to environmental changes, control evolves upwards from the individuals to an appropriate intermediate level rather than being imposed from above. The setting for the work is the dynamically changing global space resulting from ubiquitous communication. Accordingly, the article begins by determining the characteristics of the distributed multi-agent space it spans. It then fleshes out the principle of distribution, with examples from daily life as well as from Computer Science. The case is made for the principle of distribution to work at various levels of abstraction of system behavior: to inform the high-level discussion that ought to precede the more low-level concerns of technology, protocols, and standardization, but also to facilitate those lower levels. Of the more substantial applications given here of the principle of distribution, a technical example concerns the design of secure ad hoc networks of mobile devices, achievable without any form of centralized authentication or identification but in a solely distributed manner. Here, the context is how the principle can be used to provide new and provably secure protocols for genuinely ubiquitous communication. A second, more managerial example concerns the distributed production and management of open-source software, and a third investigates some pertinent questions involving the dynamic restructuring of control in distributed systems, important in times of disaster or malevolence.
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1134-1142
    Type
    a
  7. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.02
    0.019754423 = product of:
      0.049386058 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=420,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.042574905 = sum of:
          0.011163551 = weight(_text_:information in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011163551 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_f.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
    Type
    a
  8. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.014691055 = product of:
      0.036727637 = sum of:
        0.0023839036 = weight(_text_:a in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023839036 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.034343734 = sum of:
          0.012355788 = weight(_text_:information in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012355788 = score(doc=459,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.1517936 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.021987949 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021987949 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
    Type
    a
  9. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.013134009 = product of:
      0.03283502 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=2833,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
        0.025129084 = product of:
          0.050258167 = sum of:
            0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050258167 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
    Type
    a
  10. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.01
    0.012592333 = product of:
      0.031480834 = sum of:
        0.002043346 = weight(_text_:a in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002043346 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
        0.029437486 = sum of:
          0.010590675 = weight(_text_:information in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010590675 = score(doc=462,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.1301088 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
          0.018846812 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018846812 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
    Content
    "Ethik und Information - Ethische Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe (Stand: 15.3.2007) Bibliothek und Information Deutschland (BID e.V.) ist die Dachorganisation der Bibliotheks- und Informationsverbände in Deutschland. Die in den Mitgliedsverbänden der BID organisierten Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen richten ihre professionellen Aktivitäten nach ethischen Grundsätzen aus, die Verhaltensstandards bewirken, die Bestandteil des beruflichen Selbstverständnisses werden sollen. Die Beschäftigten in den Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufen engagieren sich nicht beruflich in Organisationen, deren Tätigkeit oder Ziele diesen ethischen Grundsätzen entgegenstehen. Die BID und ihre Mitgliedsverbände und Mitgliedsorganisationen setzen sich im beruflichen Umfeld für das Arbeiten nach diesen ethischen Grundsätzen ein. Das geschieht unter anderem durch laufende Information, durch berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung, durch Kooperation mit verwandten Organisationen und durch die Reaktion in der Öffentlichkeit auf bekannt werdende Verstöße gegen diese Grundsätze. Die Mitglieder der BID machen diese ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe im Berufsstand und in der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit bekannt.
    Type
    a
  11. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.01
    0.012231203 = product of:
      0.030578006 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
        0.025129084 = product of:
          0.050258167 = sum of:
            0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050258167 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
    Type
    a
  12. Froehlich, T.J.: Ethical considerations of information professionals (1992) 0.01
    0.011470848 = product of:
      0.028677119 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 6741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=6741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6741)
        0.019141505 = product of:
          0.03828301 = sum of:
            0.03828301 = weight(_text_:information in 6741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03828301 = score(doc=6741,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 6741, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 27(1992), S.291-324
    Type
    a
  13. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01
    0.010702303 = product of:
      0.026755756 = sum of:
        0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004767807 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
        0.021987949 = product of:
          0.043975897 = sum of:
            0.043975897 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043975897 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
    Type
    a
  14. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬"The dearest of our possessions" : applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy (2020) 0.01
    0.010357989 = product of:
      0.025894972 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=5939,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
        0.017721588 = product of:
          0.035443176 = sum of:
            0.035443176 = weight(_text_:information in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035443176 = score(doc=5939,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.4354273 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This conceptual article argues for the value of an approach to privacy in the digital information environment informed by Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information and information ethics. This approach involves achieving informational privacy, through the features of anonymity and obscurity, through an optimal balance of ontological frictions. This approach may be used to modify models for information behavior and for information literacy, giving them a fuller and more effective coverage of privacy issues in the infosphere. For information behavior, the Information Seeking and Communication Model and the Information Grounds conception are most appropriate for this purpose. For information literacy, the metaliteracy model, using a modification a privacy literacy framework, is most suitable.
    Series
    Special issue: Information privacy in the digital age
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.9, S.1030-1043
    Type
    a
  15. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.01
    0.010167557 = product of:
      0.02541889 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
        0.019969968 = product of:
          0.039939936 = sum of:
            0.039939936 = weight(_text_:information in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039939936 = score(doc=1865,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.490671 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1124-1127
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  16. Zwass, V.: Ethical issues in information systems (1996) 0.01
    0.010065834 = product of:
      0.025164586 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 6847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=6847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6847)
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 6847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=6847,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 6847, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.57, [=Suppl.20]
    Type
    a
  17. Britz, J.J.: Making the global information society good : A social justice perspective on the ethical dimensions of the global information society (2008) 0.01
    0.009995114 = product of:
      0.024987785 = sum of:
        0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100103095 = score(doc=1870,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
        0.014977476 = product of:
          0.029954951 = sum of:
            0.029954951 = weight(_text_:information in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029954951 = score(doc=1870,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses social justice as a moral norm that can be used to address the ethical challenges facing us in the global Information Society. The global Information Society is seen as a continuation of relationships which have been altered by the use of modern information and communication technologies (ICTs). Four interrelated characteristics of the global Information Society also are identified. After a brief overview of the main socioethical issues facing the global Information Society, the article discusses the application of social justice as a moral tool that has universal moral validity and which can be used to address these ethical challenges. It is illustrated that the scope of justice is no longer limited to domestic issues. Three core principles of justice are furthermore distinguished, and based on these three principles, seven categories of justice are introduced. It is illustrated how these categories of justice can be applied to address the main ethical challenges of the Information Society.
    Footnote
    Beitrag innerhalb eines Themenschwerpunkts: Perspectives on global information ethics
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.7, S.1171-1183
    Type
    a
  18. Clay, J.: Participative citizenry in the information age : the role of science and technolgy towards democratic education in a multicultural society (1996) 0.01
    0.009982069 = product of:
      0.024955172 = sum of:
        0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155891 = score(doc=2450,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
        0.013396261 = product of:
          0.026792523 = sum of:
            0.026792523 = weight(_text_:information in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026792523 = score(doc=2450,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information society: new media, ethics and postmodernism. Ed. K.S. Gill
    Type
    a
  19. Smith, M.M.: Information ethics (1997) 0.01
    0.009784911 = product of:
      0.024462277 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=1042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
        0.017651124 = product of:
          0.035302248 = sum of:
            0.035302248 = weight(_text_:information in 1042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035302248 = score(doc=1042,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 1042, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the concepts of information ethics, computer ethics, and cyberethics by explaining the emergence of applied information ethics through channels of professional practice and scholarly communication. Surveys the beginning of information ethics from 1988 through 1996
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 32(1997), S.339-366
    Type
    a
  20. Pearce, T.: Draft IIS guidelines for professional ethics for information professionals (1998) 0.01
    0.009269844 = product of:
      0.02317461 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=2443,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
        0.01546867 = product of:
          0.03093734 = sum of:
            0.03093734 = weight(_text_:information in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03093734 = score(doc=2443,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the draft Institute of Information Scientists Guidelines, which are intended to provide a model of prefessional ethids for information professionals, the need for which had arisen because of changes in the information environment. Sets out: core values; definitions; standard of information provision; duties to information sources; duties to the public; duties to clients; and conflict of interest
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 94
  • d 36
  • es 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…