-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.02
0.021404605 = product of:
0.05351151 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.043975897 = product of:
0.087951794 = sum of:
0.087951794 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087951794 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
- Type
- a
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.021404605 = product of:
0.05351151 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.043975897 = product of:
0.087951794 = sum of:
0.087951794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087951794 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
- Type
- a
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.021404605 = product of:
0.05351151 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.043975897 = product of:
0.087951794 = sum of:
0.087951794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087951794 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
- Type
- a
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.018866485 = product of:
0.09433242 = sum of:
0.09433242 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.07538725 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07538725 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.018574296 = product of:
0.046435736 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=6940,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.03553789 = product of:
0.07107578 = sum of:
0.07107578 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07107578 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
- Type
- a
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.02
0.01581823 = product of:
0.039545577 = sum of:
0.0144164935 = weight(_text_:a in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144164935 = score(doc=1427,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.025129084 = product of:
0.050258167 = sum of:
0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050258167 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
- Type
- a
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.02
0.015289003 = product of:
0.038222507 = sum of:
0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068111527 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.031411353 = product of:
0.06282271 = sum of:
0.06282271 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06282271 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
- Type
- a
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.01
0.013826758 = product of:
0.034566894 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=4642,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.025129084 = product of:
0.050258167 = sum of:
0.050258167 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050258167 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
- Type
- a
-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.01
0.012609425 = product of:
0.031523563 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4640,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.021987949 = product of:
0.043975897 = sum of:
0.043975897 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043975897 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
- Type
- a
-
Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003)
0.01
0.011959012 = product of:
0.02989753 = sum of:
0.0023839036 = weight(_text_:a in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0023839036 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.027513625 = sum of:
0.005525676 = weight(_text_:information in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005525676 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.021987949 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021987949 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
- Type
- a
-
Bennion, B.C.: Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system (1980)
0.01
0.011645746 = product of:
0.029114366 = sum of:
0.013485395 = weight(_text_:a in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013485395 = score(doc=7763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
0.015628971 = product of:
0.031257942 = sum of:
0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031257942 = score(doc=7763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 31(1980), S.264-270
- Type
- a
-
Mulvany, N.C.: Back-of-the-book indexing (2009)
0.01
0.010539954 = product of:
0.026349884 = sum of:
0.01541188 = weight(_text_:a in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01541188 = score(doc=3749,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
0.010938003 = product of:
0.021876005 = sum of:
0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021876005 = score(doc=3749,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The book index occupies a special niche in the information retrieval world. Each index is a unique, authored work. Each book is a closed system. The text presented in a book does not change; the material is stable and fixed. Book indexers provide readers with a nonlinear way to access information in a text. Even though closed-system indexing predates the development of the printing press, a book index can be thought of as hypertext.
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
- Type
- a
-
Liddy, E.D.; Jorgensen, C.: Modelling information seeking behaviours in index use (1993)
0.01
0.010141909 = product of:
0.025354773 = sum of:
0.014303422 = weight(_text_:a in 7920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014303422 = score(doc=7920,freq=18.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.26752928 = fieldWeight in 7920, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7920)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 7920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=7920,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7920, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Part of a larger study which aims to: empirically investigate book-index usage, behaviours, and the extent to which specific print index features affect a user's search for information; and to examine these features in an electronic environment and to determine the optimum specifications for indexes in electronic texts by gathering evidence from a controlled user study. Provides an overview of the research project, focusing on a subset of the results from the study of hard-copy book indexes. Describes observable behaviours of a sample of users when consulting different variations of a hard copy book index. Suggests a preliminary model at 3 levels of abstraction repressing users' behaviours when using a book index
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information
- Source
- Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
- Type
- a
-
Craven, T.C.: NEPHIS: a nested phrase indexing system (1977)
0.01
0.009814699 = product of:
0.024536747 = sum of:
0.013485395 = weight(_text_:a in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013485395 = score(doc=1333,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.107-114
- Type
- a
-
Van der Meij, H.: Styling the index : is it time for a change? (2002)
0.01
0.009814699 = product of:
0.024536747 = sum of:
0.013485395 = weight(_text_:a in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013485395 = score(doc=3822,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.3, S.243-251
- Type
- a
-
Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.29
- Type
- a
-
Craven, T.C.: Changing technologies: impact on information: the case of string indexing (1985)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Armitage, J.E.; Lynch, M.F.: Some structural characteristics of articulated subject indexes (1968)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 4(1968) no.2, S.101-111
- Type
- a
-
Keitz, W. von: Automatic indexing and the dissemination of information (1986)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=2390,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2390, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2390)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 2390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=2390,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2390, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2390)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.: ¬The Permuterm Subject Index : an autobiographic review (1976)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.88-291
- Type
- a
