Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967) 0.01
    0.010065834 = product of:
      0.025164586 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.015628971 = product of:
          0.031257942 = sum of:
            0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031257942 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
    Type
    a
  2. Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965) 0.01
    0.008292621 = product of:
      0.020731552 = sum of:
        0.0144164935 = weight(_text_:a in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0144164935 = score(doc=834,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
    Type
    a
  3. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
    Type
    a
  4. Haldenwanger, H.H.M.: Begriff und Sprache in der Dokumentation (1961) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a