Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Mackenzie Owen, J.S.: Format incompatibility and the exchange of bibliographic information : a comparative study (1976) 0.01
    0.009411185 = product of:
      0.023527961 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  2. CCF/B: The Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (1992) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 8713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=8713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8713)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 8713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=8713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 8713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8713)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Simmons, P. u. A. Hopkinson
  3. CCF/F: The Common Communication Format for factual information (1992) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Hopkinson, A. u. P. Simmons
  4. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (CCF/B) (1993) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  5. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for factual information (CCF/F) (1993) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  6. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01
    0.0075387247 = product of:
      0.037693623 = sum of:
        0.037693623 = product of:
          0.07538725 = sum of:
            0.07538725 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07538725 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  7. Setting the record straight : understanding the MARC format (1993) 0.01
    0.0066833766 = product of:
      0.016708441 = sum of:
        0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100103095 = score(doc=2327,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
        0.0066981306 = product of:
          0.013396261 = sum of:
            0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013396261 = score(doc=2327,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    MARC is an acronym for Machine Readable Catalogue or Cataloguing. This general description, howcver, is rather misleading as MARC is neither a kind of catalogue nor a method of cataloguing. In fact, MARC is a Standardformat for representing bibliographic information for handling by computer. While the MARC format was primarily designed to serve the needs of libraries, the concept has since been embraced by the wider information community as a convenient way of storing and exchanging bibliographic data. The original MARC format was developed at the Library of Congress in 1965-6 leading to a pilot project, known as MARC I, which had the aim of investigating the feasibility of producing machine-readable catalogue data. Similar work was in progress in the United Kingdom whcre the Council of the British National Bibliography had set up the BNB MARC Project with the rennt of examining the use of machine-readable data in producing the printed British National Bibliography (BNB). These parallel developments led to Anglo-American co-operation an the MARC 11 project which was initiated in 1968. MARC II was to prove instrumental in defining the concept of MARC as a communications format.
  8. UNIMARC / Authorities : Universal format for authorities. Recommended by the IFLA Steering Group on a UNIMARC format for authorities (1991) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 7548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=7548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 7548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7548)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 7548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=7548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 7548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    IFLA Sections on Cataloguing and Information Technology
  9. Lauro, A. Di: IDIN manual for the creation and management of a bibliographic database using Micro-ISIS (1988) 0.01
    0.005822873 = product of:
      0.014557183 = sum of:
        0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067426977 = score(doc=4292,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
        0.007814486 = product of:
          0.015628971 = sum of:
            0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015628971 = score(doc=4292,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die UNESCO vertreibt kostenfrei die Software Micro-ISIS für PCs. Zur Anwendung in kleinen Dokumentationseinrichtungen unter dem Dach des International Development Information Network (IDIN) wurde ein eigenes IDIN-Format geschaffen, das unter dieser Software eingesetzt werden kann. Besonders berücksichtigt sind dabei unselbständige Werke und die Sacherschließung mit Hilfe des 'OECD Macrothesaurus for Information Processing in the Field of Economic and Social Development'. Das Format ist abgeleitet vom 'Common Communication Format (CCF)', das ebenfalls im Auftrag der Unesco entwickelt wurde. IDIN ist eine vereinfachte Version und hat eine andere Behandlung mehrteiliger Werke
  10. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code. Report from the 1st Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt 2003 (2004) 0.00
    0.0034689305 = product of:
      0.008672326 = sum of:
        0.0059378254 = weight(_text_:a in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059378254 = score(doc=2312,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.11106029 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
        0.0027345007 = product of:
          0.0054690014 = sum of:
            0.0054690014 = weight(_text_:information in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054690014 = score(doc=2312,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.0671879 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    BK
    06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
    Classification
    06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.4, S.255-257: (P. Riva): "Cataloguing standardization at the international level can be viewed as proceeding in a series of milestone conferences. This meeting, the first in a series which will cover different regions of the world, will take its place in that progression. The first IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code (IME ICC), held July 28-30, 2003 at Die Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt, gathered representatives of almost all European countries as well as three of the four AACR author countries. As explained in the introduction by Barbara Tillett, chair of the IME ICC planning committee, the plan is for five meetings in total. Subsequent meetings are to take place in Buenos Aires, Argentina (held August 17-18, 2004) for Latin America and the Carribean, to be followed by Alexandria, Egypt (2005) for the Middle East, Seoul, South Korea (2006) for Asia, and Durban, South Africa (2007) for Africa. The impetus for planning these meetings was triggered by the 40th anniversary of the Paris Principles, approved at the International Conference an Cataloguing Principles held in 1961. Many will welcome the timely publication of the reports and papers from this important conference in book form. The original conference website (details given an p. 176) which includes most of the same material, is still extant, but the reports and papers gathered into this volume will be referred to by cataloguing rule makers long after the web as we know it has transformed itself into a new (and quite possibly not backwards compatible) environment.
    The book is organized into four sections: introduction and results; presentation papers; background papers; and an appendix. The introduction by Barbara Tillett serves as a summary and report of the IME ICC meeting itself. The statement of the purpose of the meeting bears reporting in full (p. 6): "The goal for this meeting was to increase the ability to share cataloguing information worldwide by promoting standards for the content of bibliographic records and authority records used in library catalogues." The next item is a report summarizing the cataloguing Code comparisons prepared prior to the conference. As a mechanism for discussion, 18 codes were compared with the Paris Principles, the extent of compliance or divergence noted and discussed by representatives from the respective rule-making bodies. During the meeting the presentation of the comparisons took up half of the first day, but for the detailed responses one must return to the IME ICC website. The published summary is very dense, and difficult to follow if one is not very familiar with the Paris Principles or the codes being compared. The main outcome of the meeting follows, this is the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (draft, as approved Dec. 19, 2003 by IME ICC participants), accompanied by a useful Glossary. The most important eontribution of this volume is to serve as the permanent and official record of the Statement as it stands after the first IME ICC meeting. Subsequent meetings will surely suggest modifications and enhancements, but this version of the Statement needs to be widely read and commented on. To this end the website also makes available translations of the Statement into 15 European languages, and the glossary into four languages. Compared to the Paris Principles, this statement covers some familiar ground in the choice of access points and forms of names, but its overall scope is broader, explicitly referring to the role of authority records, entities in bibliographic records and relationships. It concludes with an appendix of "Objectives for the construction of cataloguing codes."
    The next section collects three papers, all presented at the meeting by the people best placed to address the topics authoritatively and comprehensively. The first is by John D. Byrum, of the Library of Congress, and Chair of the ISBD Review Group, who clearly and concisely explains the history and role of the ISBDs in "IFLA's ISBD Programme. Purpose, process, and prospects." The next paper, "Brave new FRBR world" is by Patrick Le Boeuf, of the Bibliothèque nationale de France and Chair of the FRBR Review Group (a French version is available an the website). Drawing from his extensive expertise with FRBR, Le Boeuf explains what FRBR is and equally importantly is not, points to its impact in the present context of Code revision, and discusses insights relevant to the working group topics that can be drawn from FRBR. Closing this section is Barbara Tillett's contribution "A Virtual International Authority File," which signals an important change in thinking about international cooperation for bibliographic control. Earlier efforts focussed an getting agreement about form and structure of headings, this view stresses linking authority files to share the intellectual effort yet present headings to the user in the form that is most appropriate culturally.
    The section of background papers starts most appropriately by reprinting the Statement of Principles from the 1961 Paris Conference and continues with another twelve papers of varying lengths, most written specifically for the IME ICC. For the published report the papers have been organized to follow the order of topics assigned to the Tive working groups: Working Group 1 Personal names; WG2 Corporate bodies; WG3 Seriality; WG4 Multivolume/multipart structures; and WG5 Uniform titles, GMDs. Pino Buizza and Mauro Guerrini co-author a substantial paper "Author and title access point control: On the way national bibliographic agencies face the issue forty years after the Paris Principles," which was first presented in Italian at the November 2002 workshop an Cataloguing and Authority Control in Rome. Issues that remain unresolved are which name or title to adopt, which form of the name or title, and which entry word to select, while choice of headings has become more uniform. The impact of catalogue language (meaning both the language of the cataloguing agency and of the majority of users of the catalogue) an these choices is explored by examining the headings used in ten national authority files for a full range of names, personal and corporate. The reflections presented are both practical and grounded in theory. Mauro Guerrini, assisted by Pino Buizza and Lucia Sardo, contributes a further new paper "Corporate bodies from ICCP up to 2003," which is an excellent survey of the surprisingly controversial issue of corporate bodies as authors, starting with Panizzi, Jewett, Cutter, Dziatzko, Fumagalli, and Lubetzky, through the debate at the Paris Conference, to the views of Verona, Domanovszky and Carpenter, and work under the auspices of IFLA an the Form and structure of corporate headings (FSCH) project and its Rvew, as well as a look at the archival standard ISAAR(CPF). This paper is the only one to have a comprehensive bibliography.
    Ton Heijligers reflects an the relation of the IME ICC effort to AACR and calls for an examination of the principles and function of the concept of main entry in his brief paper "Main entry into the future?" Ingrid Parent's article "From ISBD (S) to ISBD(CR): a voyage of discovery and alignment" is reprinted from Serials Librarian as it tells of the successful project not only to revise an ISBD, but also to harmonize three Codes for serials cataloguing: ISBD (CR), ISSN and AACR. Gunilla Jonsson's paper "The bibliographic unit in the digital context" is a perceptive discussion of level of granularity issues which must be addressed in deciding what to catalogue. Practical issues and user expectation are important considerations, whether the material to be catalogued is digital or analog. Ann Huthwaite's paper "Class of materials concept and GMDs" as well as Tom Delsey's ensuing comments, originated as Joint Steering Committee restricted papers in 2002. It is a great service to have them made widely available in this form as they raise fundamental issues and motivate work that has since taken place, leading to the current major round of revision to AACR. The GMD issue is about more than a list of terms and their placement in the cataloguing record, it is intertwined with consideration of whether the concept of classes of materials is helpful in organizing cataloguing rules, if so, which classes are needed, and how to allow for eventual integration of new types of materials. Useful in the Code comparison exercise is an extract of the section an access points from the draft of revised RAK (German cataloguing rules). Four short papers compare aspects of the Russian Cataloguing Rules with RAK and AACR: Tatiana Maskhoulia covers corporate body headings; Elena Zagorskaya outlines current development an serials and other continuing resources; Natalia N. Kasparova covers multilevel structures; Ljubov Ermakova and Tamara Bakhturina describe the uniform title and GMD provisions. The website includes one more item by Kasparova "Bibliographic record language in multilingual electronic communication." The volume is rounded out by the appendix which includes the conference agenda, the full list of participants, and the reports from the five working groups. Not for the casual reader, this volume is a must read for anyone working an cataloguing code development at the national or international levels, as well as those teaching cataloguing. Any practising cataloguer will benefit from reading the draft statement of principles and the three presentation papers, and dipping into the background papers."
  11. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1991) 0.00
    0.0022102704 = product of:
      0.011051352 = sum of:
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  12. Dierickx, H. (Bearb.); Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): UNISIST reference manual for machine-readable bibliographic description (1986) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  13. Format integration and its effect on cataloging, training, and systems (1993) 0.00
    0.0018945175 = product of:
      0.009472587 = sum of:
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=67,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries 13(1994) no.1, S.78-79 (K.L. Walter)
  14. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Organizing audiovisual and electronic resources for access : a cataloging guide (2000) 0.00
    0.0016346768 = product of:
      0.008173384 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005) 0.00
    0.0016346768 = product of:
      0.008173384 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  16. Hagler, R.; Simmons, P.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1982) 0.00
    0.0015787644 = product of:
      0.007893822 = sum of:
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  17. Hagler, R.: ¬The bibliographic record and information technology (1997) 0.00
    0.0015787644 = product of:
      0.007893822 = sum of:
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 6175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=6175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 6175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  18. Chapman, L.: How to catalogue : a practical manual using AACR2 and Library of Congress (1990) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 6081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=6081,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6081, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6081)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A practical manual describing standard procedures in cataloguing using AACR2 1988 revision and LoC cataloguing data
  19. Furrie, B.; Data Base Development Department of The Follett Software Company: Understanding MARC Bibliographic : Machine-readable cataloging (2000) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 6772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=6772,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 6772, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6772)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    What is a MARC Record, and Why is it Important? - MARC 21 Reference Materials -- Parts VII to X - MARC 21 Reference Materials -- Parts XI to XII
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch unter: http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/umb/. - Understanding MARC: Bibliographic was a copyrighted work originally published by the Follett Software Co. in 1988 (second edition, 1989, third edition, 1990, fourth edition, 1994, fifth edition, 1998)
  20. Gredley, E.; Hopkinson, A.: Exchanging bibliographic data (1990) 0.00
    0.0013622305 = product of:
      0.0068111527 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)