Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.05 
    0.054669764 = product of:
  0.1366744 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
    0.12577656 = sum of:
      0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025260232 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046368346 = queryNorm
          0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.100516334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.100516334 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046368346 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  2. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981) 0.01 
    0.0073902505 = product of:
  0.018475626 = sum of:
    0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010661141 = score(doc=13,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
    0.007814486 = product of:
      0.015628971 = sum of:
        0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015628971 = score(doc=13,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results
    Type
    a
  3. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftliche Informationen - metawissenschaftlich betrachtet : eine Theorie der wissenschaftlichen Information (1980) 0.00 
    0.0031257942 = product of:
  0.015628971 = sum of:
    0.015628971 = product of:
      0.031257942 = sum of:
        0.031257942 = weight(_text_:information in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031257942 = score(doc=182,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Thema der Untersuchung ist die meta-wissenschaftliche Betrachtung von Informationen in den Wissenschaften. ... Der grundlegende Term "Information" wird so allgemein definiert, daß alle bis heute bekannten Definitionsvarianten (die oftmasl disziplinspezifisch ausgerichtet sind) aus diesem Term ableitbar sind. "Information" wird dabei als das Gesamt von "Signal" (materieller Aspekt) und "Informen" (ideeller Aspekt) betrachtet.
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation (GBV)
    Information und Dokumentation / Theorie (BVB)
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation (GBV)
    Information und Dokumentation / Theorie (BVB)
    Theme
    Information
  4. Stock, W.G.: Semantische Vagheiten im Lichte der dreiwertigen Logik, der Superbewertung und der unscharfen Logik (1988) 0.00 
    0.0019071229 = product of:
  0.009535614 = sum of:
    0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009535614 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  5. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Theorie der Vorstellungsproduktion der Grazer Schule für die kognitive Wissenschaft (1989) 0.00 
    0.001651617 = product of:
  0.008258085 = sum of:
    0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008258085 = score(doc=1806,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The author stresses the need for a general, overall theory of cognitive psychological processes for cognitive science. The relevance of the Graz-school theorie on the 'production of ideas' is then examined as an attempt to provide such a framework. In Graz-school, at the beginning of 20th century, representation ('Vorstellung') was the foundational aspect of all the cognitive processes. As an example of an analysis of the origin of representation Stephan Witasek's theory of sensation is surveyed. The explanation of the origin of representations is also theoretically and practically important for cognitive science
    Type
    a
  6. Stock, W.G.: Informetrische Untersuchungsmethoden auf der Grundlage der Textwortmethode (1984) 0.00 
    0.0016346768 = product of:
  0.008173384 = sum of:
    0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008173384 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications