Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.25
    0.25027037 = product of:
      0.31283796 = sum of:
        0.07364523 = product of:
          0.22093567 = sum of:
            0.22093567 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22093567 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39311135 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01155891 = score(doc=2918,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.22093567 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22093567 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39311135 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.0066981306 = product of:
          0.013396261 = sum of:
            0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013396261 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Type
    a
  2. Gasterich, F.-J.: ¬Das Intranet des F.A.Z.-Archivs (2003) 0.08
    0.079621606 = product of:
      0.199054 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=1334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1334)
        0.19088061 = weight(_text_:91 in 1334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19088061 = score(doc=1334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.7387768 = fieldWeight in 1334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1334)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Pages
    S.91-96
    Type
    a
  3. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.02
    0.0170843 = product of:
      0.04271075 = sum of:
        0.0034055763 = weight(_text_:a in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034055763 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
        0.039305177 = sum of:
          0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007893822 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.8, S.443-446
    Type
    a
  4. Großmann, K.; Schaaf, T.: Datenbankbasiertes Dokumentenmanagementsystem im Versuchswesen (2001) 0.01
    0.014118845 = product of:
      0.03529711 = sum of:
        0.00385297 = weight(_text_:a in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00385297 = score(doc=5868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.03144414 = sum of:
          0.006315058 = weight(_text_:information in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006315058 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
          0.025129084 = weight(_text_:22 in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025129084 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Agrarproduktion wird in sehr komplexer Weise durch einen steten Wandel ihrer ökono-mischen und ökologischen Rahmenbedingungen beeinflusst. Aus diesem Prozess resultieren ständig neue Anforderungen an die Agrarforschung. Bei den Forschungs- und Untersuchungsarbeiten in der Pflanzen- und Tierproduktion, im Gartenbau und im Forstwesen nimmt dabei das Experiment eine zentrale Stelle ein. Der derzeitige Stand der Dokumentation und Präsentation von Ergebnissen der Versuchstätigkeit ist gekennzeichnet durch: - Die Existenz einer Vielzahl dezentraler Pools von Versuchsberichten, - hohe Aufwendungen für deren Publizierung, in der Regel im Selbstverlag, - steigende Versandkosten, - relativ kleiner Adressatenkreis, - nur punktuell webbasierte, statische Präsentationen, - kein umfassender Austausch und damit transparente Präsentation von Versuchsresultaten, - keine strukturiert unterstützte (Datenbank-)Recherche nach bestimmten Berichten/Dokumenten/Einrichtungen/Versuchskategorien usw. Das Projekt >Versuchsberichte im Internet< (VIP) soll für Einrichtungen der Beratung, Forschung, Lehre, Praxis und Verwaltung im Agrarbereich helfen, diese Mängel zu mindern und so einen Rationalisierungseffekt auslösen. Dieses Ziel soll im Einzelnen wie folgt realisiert werden: - Input der als verteilte Informationspools in Bund und Ländern vorliegenden Versuchsberichte in eine zentrale Dokumentendatenbank bei uneingeschränkter Verfügungsgewalt und vollen Urheberrechten der beteiligten Einrichtungen; - Bereitstellung einer Online-Lösung im Internet; - Integration eines Moduls für den internetgestützten Online-Input von Dokumenten; - Gewährleistung von Datenschutz; - Unterstützung des Versuchswesens in Bund und Ländern mit dem Ziel, Rationalisierungseffekte z. B. hinsichtlich der Versuchsplanung, Dokumentations- und Kommunikationsaufwendungen, Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, e-commerce zu erreichen. Über diese Funktionen hinaus werden in das Projekt weitere Informationspools, wie Adressen, bibliographische und wissenschaftliche Informationen, Diskussionslisten, Maps u. a. integriert. Entsprechend der föderalen Struktur der Bundesrepublik steht eine Beteiligung am Projekt allen interessierten Einrichtungen in Bund und Ländern offen
    Date
    16. 5.2001 12:22:23
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
    Type
    a
  5. Bantin, P.: Electronic records management : a review of the work of a decade and a reflection on future directions (2002) 0.01
    0.0103277415 = product of:
      0.025819354 = sum of:
        0.016346768 = weight(_text_:a in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016346768 = score(doc=4255,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=4255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.71, [=Suppl.34]
    Type
    a
  6. Batley, S.: ¬The I in information architecture : the challenge of content management (2007) 0.01
    0.009962592 = product of:
      0.02490648 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=809,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
        0.01546867 = product of:
          0.03093734 = sum of:
            0.03093734 = weight(_text_:information in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03093734 = score(doc=809,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of content management in the context of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted is a review of definitions of information architecture and an analysis of the importance of content and its management within information architecture. Findings - Concludes that reality will not necessarily match the vision of organisations investing in information architecture. Originality/value - The paper considers practical issues around content and records management.
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
    Type
    a
  7. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.01
    0.00967849 = product of:
      0.024196226 = sum of:
        0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010661141 = score(doc=1499,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
        0.013535086 = product of:
          0.027070172 = sum of:
            0.027070172 = weight(_text_:information in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027070172 = score(doc=1499,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
    Type
    a
  8. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01
    0.008827171 = product of:
      0.022067927 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=1502,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
        0.012630116 = product of:
          0.025260232 = sum of:
            0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025260232 = score(doc=1502,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
    Type
    a
  9. Meer, K. van der: Document information systems (2009) 0.01
    0.008281776 = product of:
      0.020704439 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=3771,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
        0.012531055 = product of:
          0.02506211 = sum of:
            0.02506211 = weight(_text_:information in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02506211 = score(doc=3771,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    From characteristics of information, documents and document information systems (document IS), motives to use document IS are described. A few cases are presented. The functional aspects of document IS are described, derived from ISO standard 15489 on records management and the Sarbanes-Oxley law, and made operational in MoReq and DoD standard 5015.2. Explicit attention is given to related subjects from a viewpoint of document management: information sharing (workflow, knowledge management), and interoperability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools; authenticity because of the possible evidential value of documents; and digital longevity because of the possible long-time function of archival documents. The technical aspects answer functional demands; important information science standards, and standard components for 12 characteristics of document IS are described, among others ODMA, the XML family, OAIS, and metadata schemes. The design methodological aspects answer functional demands and technical possibilities. Models are introduced and the way of working of, e.g., a digitization project is described.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
    Type
    a
  10. Hesselbarth, A.: What you see is all you get? : Konzept zur Optimierung des Bildmanagements am Beispiel der jump Fotoagentur (2008) 0.01
    0.0076445015 = product of:
      0.019111253 = sum of:
        0.0034055763 = weight(_text_:a in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034055763 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
        0.015705677 = product of:
          0.031411353 = sum of:
            0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031411353 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:34:12
  11. Haessler, J.: Entwicklung von Records Management Software : "Weg von einzelnen Projektlösungen hin zum Softwarehersteller" (2009) 0.01
    0.007189882 = product of:
      0.017974705 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=3128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
        0.011163551 = product of:
          0.022327103 = sum of:
            0.022327103 = weight(_text_:information in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022327103 = score(doc=3128,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.365-368
    Type
    a
  12. Fischer, J.: Rezeptpflichtig : Biztalk: XML-Framework zum Dokumentenaustausch (2002) 0.01
    0.007058388 = product of:
      0.01764597 = sum of:
        0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008173384 = score(doc=848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
    Type
    a
  13. Peters, G.; Gaese, V.: ¬Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von G+J (2003) 0.01
    0.006913379 = product of:
      0.017283447 = sum of:
        0.0047189053 = weight(_text_:a in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047189053 = score(doc=1507,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
        0.012564542 = product of:
          0.025129084 = sum of:
            0.025129084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025129084 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Wir werden einmal die Grundlagen des Text-Mining-Systems bei IBM darstellen, dann werden wir das Projekt etwas umfangreicher und deutlicher darstellen, da kennen wir uns aus. Von daher haben wir zwei Teile, einmal Heidelberg, einmal Hamburg. Noch einmal zur Technologie. Text-Mining ist eine von IBM entwickelte Technologie, die in einer besonderen Ausformung und Programmierung für uns zusammengestellt wurde. Das Projekt hieß bei uns lange Zeit DocText Miner und heißt seit einiger Zeit auf Vorschlag von IBM DocCat, das soll eine Abkürzung für Document-Categoriser sein, sie ist ja auch nett und anschaulich. Wir fangen an mit Text-Mining, das bei IBM in Heidelberg entwickelt wurde. Die verstehen darunter das automatische Indexieren als eine Instanz, also einen Teil von Text-Mining. Probleme werden dabei gezeigt, und das Text-Mining ist eben eine Methode zur Strukturierung von und der Suche in großen Dokumentenmengen, die Extraktion von Informationen und, das ist der hohe Anspruch, von impliziten Zusammenhängen. Das letztere sei dahingestellt. IBM macht das quantitativ, empirisch, approximativ und schnell. das muss man wirklich sagen. Das Ziel, und das ist ganz wichtig für unser Projekt gewesen, ist nicht, den Text zu verstehen, sondern das Ergebnis dieser Verfahren ist, was sie auf Neudeutsch a bundle of words, a bag of words nennen, also eine Menge von bedeutungstragenden Begriffen aus einem Text zu extrahieren, aufgrund von Algorithmen, also im Wesentlichen aufgrund von Rechenoperationen. Es gibt eine ganze Menge von linguistischen Vorstudien, ein wenig Linguistik ist auch dabei, aber nicht die Grundlage der ganzen Geschichte. Was sie für uns gemacht haben, ist also die Annotierung von Pressetexten für unsere Pressedatenbank. Für diejenigen, die es noch nicht kennen: Gruner + Jahr führt eine Textdokumentation, die eine Datenbank führt, seit Anfang der 70er Jahre, da sind z.Z. etwa 6,5 Millionen Dokumente darin, davon etwas über 1 Million Volltexte ab 1993. Das Prinzip war lange Zeit, dass wir die Dokumente, die in der Datenbank gespeichert waren und sind, verschlagworten und dieses Prinzip haben wir auch dann, als der Volltext eingeführt wurde, in abgespeckter Form weitergeführt. Zu diesen 6,5 Millionen Dokumenten gehören dann eben auch ungefähr 10 Millionen Faksimileseiten, weil wir die Faksimiles auch noch standardmäßig aufheben.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:36
    Type
    a
  14. Dahmen, E.: Klassifikation als Ordnundssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (2003) 0.01
    0.006913379 = product of:
      0.017283447 = sum of:
        0.0047189053 = weight(_text_:a in 1513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047189053 = score(doc=1513,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 1513, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1513)
        0.012564542 = product of:
          0.025129084 = sum of:
            0.025129084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025129084 = score(doc=1513,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1513, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1513)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die bis heute gültige Grundkonzeption einer Klassifikation für die elektronische Pressedatenbank im WDR wurde seit 1989 von Klaus Leesch und Mitarbeitern entwickelt. Die inhaltliche Ausgestaltung und Strukturierung erfolgte durch verschiedene Mitarbeiter des Pressearchivs. Mit Beginn der Digitalisierung 1993 kam die erste Klassifikation ("PARIS-Klassifikation") zum Einsatz, sie wurde in den folgenden Jahren von Dr. Bernhard Brandhofer mehrmals überarbeitet und hin zu einer archivübergreifenden Klassifikation ("D&A-Klassifikation") erweitert. Seit August 1999 ist diese Klassifikation die Grundlage der inhaltlichen Erschließung für die kooperierenden ARD-Pressearchive. Die letzte Überarbeitung fand 2000/2001 in der AG Erschließung des PAN (Presse-Archiv-Netzwerk der ARD) in Zusammenarbeit von Mitarbeitern des NDR, SWR und WDR statt und kommt ab Mai 2001 zum Einsatz (PAN-Klassifikation).
    Date
    28. 4.2003 13:35:22
    Object
    D&A-Klassifikation
    Type
    a
  15. Hare, C.E.; McLeod, J.: How to manage records in the e-environment : 2nd ed. (2006) 0.01
    0.0064290287 = product of:
      0.016072571 = sum of:
        0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008258085 = score(doc=1749,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
        0.007814486 = product of:
          0.015628971 = sum of:
            0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015628971 = score(doc=1749,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A practical approach to developing and operating an effective programme to manage hybrid records within an organization. This title positions records management as an integral business function linked to the organisation's business aims and objectives. The authors also address the records requirements of new and significant pieces of legislation, such as data protection and freedom of information, as well as exploring strategies for managing electronic records. Bullet points, checklists and examples assist the reader throughout, making this a one-stop resource for information in this area.
    Footnote
    1. Aufl. u.d.T.: Developing a records management programme
  16. Wandeler, J.: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof? : Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (2003) 0.01
    0.0061156014 = product of:
      0.015289003 = sum of:
        0.002724461 = weight(_text_:a in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002724461 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
        0.012564542 = product of:
          0.025129084 = sum of:
            0.025129084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025129084 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:09:10
    Type
    a
  17. Schlenkrich, C.: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit : Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (2003) 0.01
    0.0061156014 = product of:
      0.015289003 = sum of:
        0.002724461 = weight(_text_:a in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002724461 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.012564542 = product of:
          0.025129084 = sum of:
            0.025129084 = weight(_text_:22 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025129084 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:05:56
    Type
    a
  18. Wettengel, M.; Brübach, N.; Herzog, G.: DIN-Arbeitsgremium "Archiv- und Schriftgutverwaltung" an der Erarbeitung der ISO 15489 beteiligt : Abstimmung über Norm-Entwurf läuft (2000) 0.01
    0.00588199 = product of:
      0.014704974 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
        0.007893822 = product of:
          0.015787644 = sum of:
            0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015787644 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 51(2000) H.8, S.492-493
    Type
    a
  19. Graner, B.; Fresenborg, M.; Lühr, A.; Seifert, J.; Sünkler, S.: Schriftgutverwaltung an der Hochschule : Entwicklung eines aufgabenorientierten Aktenplans für die Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (2009) 0.01
    0.005822873 = product of:
      0.014557183 = sum of:
        0.0067426977 = weight(_text_:a in 3134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067426977 = score(doc=3134,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3134, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3134)
        0.007814486 = product of:
          0.015628971 = sum of:
            0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 3134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015628971 = score(doc=3134,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3134, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.383-386
    Type
    a
  20. Gennis, M.: Schriftgutverwaltung und Langzeitarchivierung : Records Management (k)ein Thema an informationswissenschaftlichen Ausbildungsstätten in Deutschland? (2009) 0.01
    0.005751905 = product of:
      0.014379762 = sum of:
        0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005448922 = score(doc=3129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
        0.0089308405 = product of:
          0.017861681 = sum of:
            0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 3129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017861681 = score(doc=3129,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3129, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Recordsmanagement kein Thema für Information Professionals?"
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.6/7, S.387-392
    Type
    a

Languages

  • d 50
  • e 16

Types

  • a 54
  • x 6
  • m 5
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…