Search (53 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.04
    0.04197444 = product of:
      0.1049361 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.09812495 = sum of:
          0.035302248 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035302248 = score(doc=1085,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.06282271 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06282271 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-1-3/what-is-information-an-information-veteran-looks-back-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-1?page=1.
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  2. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.03
    0.0341686 = product of:
      0.0854215 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
        0.07861035 = sum of:
          0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015787644 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.06282271 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06282271 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  3. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.03
    0.03018086 = product of:
      0.07545215 = sum of:
        0.009632425 = weight(_text_:a in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009632425 = score(doc=950,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
        0.065819725 = sum of:
          0.034408372 = weight(_text_:information in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034408372 = score(doc=950,freq=38.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.42271453 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                  38.0 = termFreq=38.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  4. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.03
    0.029731482 = product of:
      0.074328706 = sum of:
        0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076151006 = score(doc=5839,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
        0.0667136 = sum of:
          0.035302248 = weight(_text_:information in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035302248 = score(doc=5839,freq=40.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                  40.0 = termFreq=40.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  5. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.02
    0.024967303 = product of:
      0.062418256 = sum of:
        0.005779455 = weight(_text_:a in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005779455 = score(doc=351,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
        0.0566388 = sum of:
          0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018945174 = score(doc=351,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
          0.037693623 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037693623 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1285-1294
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  6. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.02
    0.024908978 = product of:
      0.062272444 = sum of:
        0.005898632 = weight(_text_:a in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005898632 = score(doc=5835,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.056373812 = sum of:
          0.02496246 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496246 = score(doc=5835,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify key countries and their focal research fields on the information divide. Design/methodology/approach Literature was retrieved to identify key countries and their primary focus. The literature research method was adopted to identify aspects of the primary focus in each key country. Findings The key countries with literature on the information divide are the USA, China, the UK and India. The problem of health is prominent in the USA, and solutions include providing information, distinguishing users' profiles and improving eHealth literacy. Economic and political factors led to the urban-rural information divide in China, and policy is the most powerful solution. Under the influence of humanism, research on the information divide in the UK focuses on all age groups, and solutions differ according to age. Deep-rooted patriarchal concepts and traditional marriage customs make the gender information divide prominent in India, and increasing women's information consciousness is a feasible way to reduce this divide. Originality/value This paper is an extensive review study on the information divide, which clarifies the key countries and their focal fields in research on this topic. More important, the paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes existing literature from a country perspective.
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  7. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.02
    0.023764154 = product of:
      0.059410382 = sum of:
        0.009823184 = weight(_text_:a in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009823184 = score(doc=5655,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18373153 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
        0.049587198 = sum of:
          0.024458116 = weight(_text_:information in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024458116 = score(doc=5655,freq=30.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.3004734 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                  30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.025129084 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025129084 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Information (2023) 0.01
    0.011470848 = product of:
      0.028677119 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=1118,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1118, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1118)
        0.019141505 = product of:
          0.03828301 = sum of:
            0.03828301 = weight(_text_:information in 1118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03828301 = score(doc=1118,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 1118, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a brief history of the term "information" and its different meanings, which are both important and difficult because the different meanings of the term imply whole theories of knowledge. The article further considers the relation between "information" and the concepts "matter and energy", "data", "sign and meaning", "knowledge" and "communication". It presents and analyses the influence of information in information studies and knowledge organization and contains a presentation and critical analysis of some compound terms such as "information need", "information overload" and "information retrieval", which illuminate the use of the term information in information studies. An appendix provides a chronological list of definitions of information.
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  9. Huvila, I.: Making and taking information (2022) 0.01
    0.011233318 = product of:
      0.028083295 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=527,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.018945174 = product of:
          0.03789035 = sum of:
            0.03789035 = weight(_text_:information in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03789035 = score(doc=527,freq=32.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                  5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                    32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information behavior theory covers different aspects of the totality of information-related human behavior rather unevenly. The transitions or trading zones between different types of information activities have remained perhaps especially under-theorized. This article interrogates and expands a conceptual apparatus of information making and information taking as a pair of substantial concepts for explaining, in part, the mobility of information in terms of doing that unfolds as a process of becoming rather than of being, and in part, what is happening when information comes into being and when something is taken up for use as information. Besides providing an apparatus to describe the nexus of information provision and acquisition, a closer consideration of the parallel doings opens opportunities to enrich the inquiry of the conditions and practice of information seeking, appropriation, discovery, and retrieval as modes taking, and learning and information use as its posterities.
    Series
    JASIS&Tspecial issue on information behavior and information practices theory
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.4, S.528-541
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  10. McDowell, K.: Storytelling wisdom : story, information, and DIKW (2021) 0.01
    0.010608352 = product of:
      0.026520878 = sum of:
        0.010812371 = weight(_text_:a in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010812371 = score(doc=350,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
        0.015708508 = product of:
          0.031417016 = sum of:
            0.031417016 = weight(_text_:information in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031417016 = score(doc=350,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.38596505 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Most information science (IS) definitions of information center individual rather than collective meaning-making. Because stories are constituted through narrative experience, and audiences are partly constitutive of the stories told to and with them, storytelling offers a framework for researching collective experiences of information. Stories are simultaneously empirical and socially constructed, bridging a key epistemological divide in IS. Storytelling as paradigm shift is explored and demonstrated in three sections that (a) define story and storytelling, (b) describe how story and storytelling can extend the data, information, knowledge, and wisdom (DIKW) pyramid, and (c) revise DIKW as a new storytelling S-DIKW framework. Future IS storytelling research should account for story and the dynamics of storytelling not merely as a subset of information or of information behavior, but as a fundamental information form.
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1223-1233
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  11. Bosancic, B.; Matijevic, M.: Information as a construction (2020) 0.01
    0.010603909 = product of:
      0.026509773 = sum of:
        0.012278981 = weight(_text_:a in 5832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012278981 = score(doc=5832,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.22966442 = fieldWeight in 5832, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5832)
        0.0142307915 = product of:
          0.028461583 = sum of:
            0.028461583 = weight(_text_:information in 5832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028461583 = score(doc=5832,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 5832, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this review paper is to outline the constructivist approach to the notion of information from two perspectives. The first perspective explores the role of 'constructed' information in the 'constructivist niche' - a common name for the appropriate viewpoints in different science fields, such as cognitive and neuroscience, psychology, cybernetics and biology of cognition. The second perspective considers library and information science (LIS) papers in which information is treated as a constructed entity. This paper assumed the origin of the notion of information to be a construction as defined in the 'constructivist niche' that is based upon communication theory and cybernetics. Conversely, the origin of the notion of information as a construction as per LIS can be found in Bateson's definition of information as a 'difference which makes the difference,' as well as in the 1970s LIS definition wherein information is associated with the direction of a cognitive viewpoint, as in a 'cognitive turn'. The study showed that 'information as a construction', except in a few cases, did not play a significant role in the constructivist theories nor in LIS. LIS researchers reduce the concept of information to a subjective, socially-constructed entity which inherently results in different interpretations.
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information Science. 52(2020) no.2, S.620-630
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  12. Information : a reader (2022) 0.01
    0.010422281 = product of:
      0.026055701 = sum of:
        0.010769378 = weight(_text_:a in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010769378 = score(doc=622,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
        0.015286323 = product of:
          0.030572645 = sum of:
            0.030572645 = weight(_text_:information in 622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030572645 = score(doc=622,freq=30.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.37559175 = fieldWeight in 622, product of:
                  5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                    30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    For decades, we have been told we live in the "information age"-a time when disruptive technological advancement has reshaped the categories and social uses of knowledge and when quantitative assessment is increasingly privileged. Such methodologies and concepts of information are usually considered the provenance of the natural and social sciences, which present them as politically and philosophically neutral. Yet the humanities should and do play an important role in interpreting and critiquing the historical, cultural, and conceptual nature of information. This book is one of two companion volumes that explore theories and histories of information from a humanistic perspective. They consider information as a long-standing feature of social, cultural, and conceptual management, a matter of social practice, and a fundamental challenge for the humanities today. Information: A Reader provides an introduction to the concept of information in historical, literary, and cultural studies. It features excerpts from more than forty texts by theorists and critics who have helped establish the notion of the "information age" or expand upon it. The reader establishes a canonical framework for thinking about information in humanistic terms. Together with Information: Keywords, it sets forth a major humanistic vision of the concept of information.
    Editor
    Hayot, E., A. Detwyler u. L. Pao
    RSWK
    Information / Philosophie / Soziologie / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Information / Philosophie / Soziologie / Aufsatzsammlung
    Theme
    Information
  13. Smith, A.O.; Hemsley, J.: Memetics as informational difference : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022) 0.01
    0.00998701 = product of:
      0.024967523 = sum of:
        0.01129502 = weight(_text_:a in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01129502 = score(doc=682,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
        0.013672504 = product of:
          0.027345007 = sum of:
            0.027345007 = weight(_text_:information in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027345007 = score(doc=682,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Information scientists may find value in studying cultural information evolution and information diffusion through memetics. Information studies in memetics have often found datafication in memetics research difficult. Meanwhile, current memetic scholarship elsewhere is abundant in data due to their focus on Internet artifacts. This paper offers a way to close the datafication gap for information researchers by associating information data with "differences" between memetic documents. Design/methodology/approach This work offers a joint theory and methodology invested in information-oriented memetics. This methodology of differences is developed from a content analysis of difference on a collection of images with visual similarities. Findings The authors find that this kind of analysis provides a heuristic method for quantitatively bounding where one meme ends and another begins. The authors also find that this approach helps describe the dynamics of memetic media in such a way that the authors can datafy information or cultural evolution more clearly. Originality/value Here the authors offer an approach for studying cultural information evolution through the study of memes. In doing so, the authors forward a methodology of difference which leverages content analysis in order to outline how it functions practically. The authors propose a quantitative methodology to assess differences between versions of document contents in order to examine what a particular meme is. The authors also move toward showing the information structure which defines a meme.
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  14. Ma, Y.: Understanding information : adding a non-individualistic lens (2021) 0.01
    0.009744171 = product of:
      0.024360428 = sum of:
        0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076151006 = score(doc=382,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
        0.016745327 = product of:
          0.033490654 = sum of:
            0.033490654 = weight(_text_:information in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033490654 = score(doc=382,freq=36.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.41144013 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
                  6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                    36.0 = termFreq=36.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The individualistic lens refers to the understanding of problematic information as something that is clearly identifiable, with objective criteria of measurement. This article argues for adding a non-individualistic lens for understanding information. The necessity for adding a non-individualistic lens grows from that the existing individualistic lens appears inadequate to make sense of information phenomenon, in particular when it comes to understanding problematic information. Non-individualistic is proposed as a complementary perspective, which needs to be further developed conceptually. To begin such development, this article directs information professionals' attention to the promising concept of information ecology. More specifically, this article pulls resources from philosophy of information (Floridi's infosphere) and information ethics (Capurro's Angeletics) to illustrate existing conceptualizations of information ecology. Information ecology appears to align with this sociotechnical view that information researchers have started to develop in the most recent years, though arguably information ecology may have an even broader scope. Lastly, this article also points out that the conceptualization of information ecology needs to be aware of, and cautious of the philosophical assumption that is relied on for understanding information.
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1295-1305
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  15. Graminius, C.: Fast-food information, information quality and information gap : a temporal exploration of the notion of information in science communication on climate change (2022) 0.01
    0.009651828 = product of:
      0.02412957 = sum of:
        0.008341924 = weight(_text_:a in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008341924 = score(doc=684,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
        0.015787644 = product of:
          0.03157529 = sum of:
            0.03157529 = weight(_text_:information in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03157529 = score(doc=684,freq=32.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
                  5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                    32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this study is to discuss the concept of information in relation to temporality within the context of climate change communication. Furthermore, the paper aims to highlight the empirical richness of information as a concept by analysing its use in context. Design/methodology/approach The discussion is based on 14 semi-structured interviews with initiators and collaborators of 6 open letters on climate change published in 2018-2019. By taking three specific notions the interviewees introduced-fast food information, information quality and information gap-as the analytical point of departure, the study aims for a contextual understanding of information grounded in temporal sensitivity. Findings The paper finds that information in the context of open letters is informed by different, and at times contradicting, temporalities and timescapes which align with various material, institutional and discursive practices. Based on this finding, the paper argues that notions of information are intrinsically linked to the act of communicating, and they should be viewed as co-constituting each other. Originality/value The paper contributes with an empirically informed discussion regarding the concept of information as it is used in a specific context. It illustrates how "information" is far from being understood in a singular fashion, but is made up of multifaceted and at times contradictory understandings. Ultimately, they correspond to why and how one communicates climate change information.
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  16. Riley, F.; Allen, D.K.; Wilson, T.D.: When politicians and the experts collide : organization and the creation of information spheres (2022) 0.01
    0.009646239 = product of:
      0.024115596 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=637,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.014977476 = product of:
          0.029954951 = sum of:
            0.029954951 = weight(_text_:information in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029954951 = score(doc=637,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores collaborative information behavior in the context of highly politicized decision making. It draws upon a qualitative case study of project management of a contentious public sector infrastructure project. We noted the creation of spaces for the development and exchange of information by experts and conceptualize these as information spheres. We postulate that these were formed to bypass power-induced information behavior that excludes expert power, such as information avoidance. This approach contrasts with the expected project management and information norms, rules and behavior, however, provides a language that can be used to explain the phenomena of bounded information spaces which complement and may be used as a development of adjunct to small world's theory.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.8, S.1127-1139
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  17. Tang, R.; Mehra, B.; Du, J.T.; Zhao, Y.C.: Paradigm shift in the field of information (2021) 0.01
    0.009039519 = product of:
      0.022598797 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 5902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=5902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5902)
        0.015787644 = product of:
          0.03157529 = sum of:
            0.03157529 = weight(_text_:information in 5902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03157529 = score(doc=5902,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 5902, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1217-1222
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  18. Erdelez, S.; Makri, S.: Information encountering re-encountered : a conceptual re-examination of serendipity in the context of information acquisition (2020) 0.01
    0.008805771 = product of:
      0.022014428 = sum of:
        0.008341924 = weight(_text_:a in 5922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008341924 = score(doc=5922,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 5922, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5922)
        0.013672504 = product of:
          0.027345007 = sum of:
            0.027345007 = weight(_text_:information in 5922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027345007 = score(doc=5922,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 5922, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5922)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In order to understand the totality, diversity and richness of human information behavior, increasing research attention has been paid to examining serendipity in the context of information acquisition. However, several issues have arisen as this research subfield has tried to find its feet; we have used different, inconsistent terminology to define this phenomenon (e.g. information encountering, accidental information discovery, incidental information acquisition), the scope of the phenomenon has not been clearly defined and its nature was not fully understood or fleshed-out. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, information encountering (IE) was proposed as the preferred term for serendipity in the context of information acquisition. Findings A reconceptualized definition and scope of IE was presented, a temporal model of IE and a refined model of IE that integrates the IE process with contextual factors and extends previous models of IE to include additional information acquisition activities pre- and postencounter. Originality/value By providing a more precise definition, clearer scope and richer theoretical description of the nature of IE, there was hope to make the phenomenon of serendipity in the context of information acquisition more accessible, encouraging future research consistency and thereby promoting deeper, more unified theoretical development.
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  19. Wu, P.F.; Vitak, J.; Zimmer, M.T.: ¬A contextual approach to information privacy research (2020) 0.01
    0.008756561 = product of:
      0.021891402 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=5768,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
        0.012355788 = product of:
          0.024711575 = sum of:
            0.024711575 = weight(_text_:information in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024711575 = score(doc=5768,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this position article, we synthesize various knowledge gaps in information privacy scholarship and propose a research agenda that promotes greater cross-disciplinary collaboration within the iSchool community and beyond. We start by critically examining Westin's conceptualization of information privacy and argue for a contextual approach that holds promise for overcoming some of Westin's weaknesses. We then highlight three contextual considerations for studying privacy-digital networks, marginalized populations, and the global context-and close by discussing how these considerations advance privacy theorization and technology design.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.4, S.485-490
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  20. Hicks, A.: Moving beyond the descriptive : the grounded theory of mitigating risk and the theorisation of information literacy (2020) 0.01
    0.008738357 = product of:
      0.021845892 = sum of:
        0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076151006 = score(doc=5651,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
        0.0142307915 = product of:
          0.028461583 = sum of:
            0.028461583 = weight(_text_:information in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028461583 = score(doc=5651,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Information literacy has been consistently undertheorised. The purpose of this paper is to contribute in the ongoing theorisation of information literacy by exploring the meaning and implications of the emergent grounded theory of mitigating risk for information literacy research and practice. Design/methodology/approach The grounded theory was produced through a qualitative study that was framed by practice theory and the theoretical constructs of cognitive authority and affordance, and employed constructivist grounded theory, semi-structured interviews and photo-elicitation methods to explore the information literacy practices of language-learners overseas. Findings This paper provides a theoretically rich exploration of language-learner information literacy practices while further identifying the importance of time, affect and information creation within information literacy research and practice as well as the need for the continued theorisation of information literacy concepts. Research limitations/implications The paper's constructivist grounded theorisation of information literacy remains localised and contextualised rather than generalisable. Practical implications The paper raises questions and points of reflection that may be used to inform the continued development of information literacy instruction and teaching practices. Originality/value This paper contributes to an increasingly sophisticated theoretical conceptualisation of information literacy as well as forming a basis for ongoing theoretical development in the field.
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 12

Types

  • a 49
  • el 5
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…