Search (71 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017) 0.10 
    0.09924274 = product of:
  0.13232365 = sum of:
    0.011629799 = weight(_text_:a in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011629799 = score(doc=3614,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
    0.11216935 = weight(_text_:70 in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11216935 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.41413653 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
    0.008524502 = product of:
      0.017049003 = sum of:
        0.017049003 = weight(_text_:information in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017049003 = score(doc=3614,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
    Type
    a
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.04 
    0.04169536 = product of:
  0.08339072 = sum of:
    0.014860012 = weight(_text_:a in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014860012 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
    0.06853071 = product of:
      0.13706142 = sum of:
        0.13706142 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13706142 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
    Type
    a
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.04 
    0.04169536 = product of:
  0.08339072 = sum of:
    0.014860012 = weight(_text_:a in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014860012 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
    0.06853071 = product of:
      0.13706142 = sum of:
        0.13706142 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13706142 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
    Type
    a
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.04 
    0.04169536 = product of:
  0.08339072 = sum of:
    0.014860012 = weight(_text_:a in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014860012 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
    0.06853071 = product of:
      0.13706142 = sum of:
        0.13706142 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13706142 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
    Type
    a
  5. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.04 
    0.036555313 = product of:
  0.073110625 = sum of:
    0.007430006 = weight(_text_:a in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007430006 = score(doc=1493,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
    0.06568062 = sum of:
      0.017222093 = weight(_text_:information in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017222093 = score(doc=1493,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.048458528 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048458528 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  6. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.03 
    0.030094929 = product of:
  0.060189858 = sum of:
    0.0044580037 = weight(_text_:a in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044580037 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
    0.055731855 = sum of:
      0.014613431 = weight(_text_:information in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014613431 = score(doc=1736,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.041118424 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041118424 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Sehr viele Informationen sind bereits im Web verfügbar oder können aus isolierten strukturierten Datenspeichern wie Informationssystemen und sozialen Netzwerken gewonnen werden. Datenintegration durch Nachbearbeitung oder durch Suchmechanismen (z. B. D2R) ist deshalb wichtig, um Informationen allgemein verwendbar zu machen. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen die Verwendung definierter Verbindungen (typisierter Links), durch die ihre Beziehungen zueinander festgehalten werden, was Vorteile für jede Anwendung bietet, die das in Daten enthaltene Wissen wieder verwenden kann. Um ­eine semantische Daten-Landkarte herzustellen, benötigen wir Wissen über die einzelnen Daten und ihre Beziehung zu anderen Daten. Dieser Beitrag stellt unsere Arbeit zur Benutzung von Lexical Linked Data (LLD) durch ein Meta-Modell vor, das alle Ressourcen enthält und zudem die Möglichkeit bietet sie unter unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten aufzufinden. Wir verbinden damit bestehende Arbeiten über Wissensgebiete (basierend auf der Information Coding Classification) mit der Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (basierend auf der RDF/OWL-Repräsentation von EuroWordNet und den ähnlichen integrierten lexikalischen Ressourcen MultiWordNet, MEMODATA und die Hamburg Metapher DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.4/5, S.279-287
    Type
    a
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.03 
    0.029186752 = product of:
  0.058373503 = sum of:
    0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010402009 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
    0.047971494 = product of:
      0.09594299 = sum of:
        0.09594299 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09594299 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Pages
    S.9-22
    Type
    a
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.02 
    0.02084768 = product of:
  0.04169536 = sum of:
    0.007430006 = weight(_text_:a in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007430006 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
    0.034265354 = product of:
      0.06853071 = sum of:
        0.06853071 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06853071 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.02 
    0.016678143 = product of:
  0.033356287 = sum of:
    0.0059440047 = weight(_text_:a in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059440047 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
    0.027412282 = product of:
      0.054824565 = sum of:
        0.054824565 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054824565 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Historical paradigms in the philosophy of classification (1994) 0.01 
    0.013725506 = product of:
  0.027451012 = sum of:
    0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 8899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010402009 = score(doc=8899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8899)
    0.017049003 = product of:
      0.034098007 = sum of:
        0.034098007 = weight(_text_:information in 8899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034098007 = score(doc=8899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 8899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Imprint
    Medford; NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    The economics of information. ASIS'94. Proc. 57th ASIS Annual Meeting, Alexandria, VA, Oct. 17-20, 1994. Ed.: B. Maxian
    Type
    a
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Towards a future for knowledge organization (2006) 0.01 
    0.011113569 = product of:
  0.022227138 = sum of:
    0.010295319 = weight(_text_:a in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010295319 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.011931818 = product of:
      0.023863636 = sum of:
        0.023863636 = weight(_text_:information in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023863636 = score(doc=1476,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the origin and evolution of the Information Coding Classification (ICC); its theoretical basis, and structure and advantageous attributes for organizing knowledge. Pleads that the considerable work already done on the system should be taken up and developed by interested research groups through collaborative effort. Concludes with some thoughts on the future of knowledge organization for information retrieval and other applications
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Eds.: K.S. Raghavan u. K.N. Prasad
    Type
    a
  12. Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979) 0.01 
    0.009624632 = product of:
  0.019249264 = sum of:
    0.008916007 = weight(_text_:a in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008916007 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
    0.010333257 = product of:
      0.020666514 = sum of:
        0.020666514 = weight(_text_:information in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020666514 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975
    Type
    a
  13. Dahlberg, I.: ICC - Information Coding Classification : principles, structure and application possibilities (1982) 0.01 
    0.009550743 = product of:
  0.019101486 = sum of:
    0.01179477 = weight(_text_:a in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01179477 = score(doc=1238,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
    0.0073067155 = product of:
      0.014613431 = sum of:
        0.014613431 = weight(_text_:information in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014613431 = score(doc=1238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Presentation of the design, characteristics and application possibilities of a new universal classification system called ICC which is based on the premises that whenever information is to be generated or to be presented (in coded form) at least two items are necessary one of which plays the part of a subject and the other one that of the predicate of a sentence, with both these items being framed into a third one. The first basic division is by the categorial concepts denoting general entities and general aspects/determinations of being, framed into an evolutionary pattern of levels creating the 81 subject groups of ICC. Each of these subject groups is structured by a socalled systematifier, applying a recurring series of facets. The overall structure is explained and some of its application fields are outlined
    Type
    a
  14. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : its scope and possibilities (1993) 0.01 
    0.0093884235 = product of:
  0.018776847 = sum of:
    0.0118880095 = weight(_text_:a in 6315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0118880095 = score(doc=6315,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6315, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6315)
    0.0068888376 = product of:
      0.013777675 = sum of:
        0.013777675 = weight(_text_:information in 6315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013777675 = score(doc=6315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Sketch of historical development of knowledge organization and presentation of its scope as shown by the contents of the literature service, now called 'Knowledge Organization Literature'. The scheme is explained and shown on its three levels as well as its correlation to a universal classification system of knowledge fields, the 'Information Coding Classification'. The possibilities of Knowledge Organization as a help for everybody, especially also students and above all students of education, and a help for political, industrial and social leaders are discussed. 10 measures for consideration and activation are listed
    Type
    a
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : a new science? (2006) 0.01 
    0.00938377 = product of:
  0.01876754 = sum of:
    0.012739806 = weight(_text_:a in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012739806 = score(doc=3375,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
    0.006027733 = product of:
      0.012055466 = sum of:
        0.012055466 = weight(_text_:information in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012055466 = score(doc=3375,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In ISKO's name, the term "Knowledge Organization" (KO) denotes already the object and the activity area significant for the existence of any science. Both areas are outlined and their specific contents shown. Also a survey of its special subfields is given. The sciencetheoretical foundation of Knowledge Organization as a new scientific discipline is based on the propositional concept of science. Within a universal system of the sciences, KO has been regarded as a subfield of Science of Science. Concludingly it is proposed to find the necessary institution for work in concerted effort of scientists, knowledge organizers and terminologists on the collection, definition, and systematization of concepts of all subject fields, utilizing the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as the necessary categorizing structure.
    Type
    a
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual structures and systematization (1995) 0.01 
    0.00907419 = product of:
  0.01814838 = sum of:
    0.008406092 = weight(_text_:a in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008406092 = score(doc=3965,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
    0.009742287 = product of:
      0.019484574 = sum of:
        0.019484574 = weight(_text_:information in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019484574 = score(doc=3965,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Examines the nature of knowledge and the relationship between the transfer of knowledge and information communication. Discusses the 3 kinds of relationships existing between concepts: formal; form-categorical; and material relationships, and characteristics of concepts. Concludes with a discussion of conceptual structures for concept definitions, conceptual systematization , concept systematization and functionality, and the analytical, referent-oriented concept theory
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.3, S.9-24
    Type
    a
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Information Coding Classification : Geschichtliches, Prinzipien, Inhaltliches (2010) 0.01 
    0.008937911 = product of:
  0.017875822 = sum of:
    0.0059440047 = weight(_text_:a in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059440047 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
    0.011931818 = product of:
      0.023863636 = sum of:
        0.023863636 = weight(_text_:information in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023863636 = score(doc=4057,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag umfasst eine Einführung in das Verständnis der Information Coding Classification (ICC), einer Universalklassifikation von Wissensgebieten. Er enthält (1) Entstehungsgeschichte (1970 bis 1977), (2) ihre Prinzipien: Begriffe, Begriffsbeziehungen, Notation, Hauptklassen als Objektbereiche in Integrationsstufen, Systemstellenplan als Systematifikator mit neun Aspekten zur Untergliederung, Verbindungsmöglichkeiten mit anderen Systemen, Systemstellen zur Darstellung von Inter- und Transdisziplinarität. Verwendungsmöglichkeiten. (3) Erläuterung ihres Inhalts und kurze Erörterung der Probleme bei der Konzeption und Erarbeitung.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.8, S.449-454
    Type
    a
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996) 0.01 
    0.008887883 = product of:
  0.017775767 = sum of:
    0.012609138 = weight(_text_:a in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012609138 = score(doc=5171,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
    0.0051666284 = product of:
      0.010333257 = sum of:
        0.010333257 = weight(_text_:information in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010333257 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A multitude of library catalogs are now being entered into the Internet. Their differing classification and subject headings systems used for subject access call for a switching system, a black box to facilitate the location of subject fields and their subjects in these systems. The principles on which such a switching system must be built in order to provide the necessary insight, surveyability, reproducebility and ease of concept combinability (e.g. in cases of interdisciplinary subjects) are outlined and compared with the BSO which hance once been established by the FID in order to serve a switching purpose. The advantages of using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as a switching system in the Internet are demonstrated, likewise the methodology needed to establish the necessary correlation between library classification systems (and if possible also subject heading systems and thesauri) and the ICC. Finally some organizational implications for creating a switching for 6 universal systems in use are described
    Type
    a
  19. Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011) 0.01 
    0.008026698 = product of:
  0.016053395 = sum of:
    0.0117478715 = weight(_text_:a in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0117478715 = score(doc=4824,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
    0.0043055234 = product of:
      0.008611047 = sum of:
        0.008611047 = weight(_text_:information in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008611047 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
    Type
    a
  20. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The Information Coding Classification (ICC) : a modern, theory-based fully-faceted, universal system of knowledge fields (2008) 0.01 
    0.007958952 = product of:
  0.015917905 = sum of:
    0.0098289745 = weight(_text_:a in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0098289745 = score(doc=1854,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.1685276 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
    0.0060889297 = product of:
      0.012177859 = sum of:
        0.012177859 = weight(_text_:information in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177859 = score(doc=1854,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Introduction into the structure, contents and specifications (especially the Systematifier) of the Information Coding Classification, developed in the seventies and used in many ways by the author and a few others following its publication in 1982. Its theoretical basis is explained consisting in (1) the Integrative Level Theory, following an evolutionary approach of ontical areas, and integrating also on each level the aspects contained in the sequence of the levels, (2) the distinction between categories of form and categories of being, (3) the application of a feature of Systems Theory (namely the element position plan) and (4) the inclusion of a concept theory, distinguishing four kinds of relationships, originated by the kinds of characteristics (which are the elements of concepts to be derived from the statements on the properties of referents of concepts). Its special Subject Groups on each of its nine levels are outlined and the combinatory facilities at certain positions of the Systematifier are shown. Further elaboration and use have been suggested, be it only as a switching language between the six existing universal classification systems at present in use internationally.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains".
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 37
  • e 33
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 69
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes