Search (386 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Liegmann, H.: USMARC + CANMARC + UKMARC = ??? (1996) 0.14 
    0.1404278 = product of:
  0.2808556 = sum of:
    0.008916007 = weight(_text_:a in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008916007 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
    0.27193958 = weight(_text_:70 in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27193958 = score(doc=4272,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        1.0040185 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: gopher://marvel.loc.gov:70/00/.listarch/usmarc/dp90.doc - gopher://marvel.loc.gov:70/00/.listarch/usmarc/dp93.doc - http://icarus.bl.uk/nbs/marc/0list.html
    Type
    a
  2. Hegna, K.; Murtomaa, E.: Data mining MARC to find : FRBR? (2003) 0.08 
    0.08451671 = product of:
  0.16903342 = sum of:
    0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010402009 = score(doc=69,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
    0.15863141 = weight(_text_:70 in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15863141 = score(doc=69,freq=1.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.5856775 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
          1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
            1.0 = termFreq=1.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    70
    Type
    a
  3. Temmerman, P.: ISAD(G): de definitieve standaard? (1994) 0.07 
    0.06924443 = product of:
  0.13848886 = sum of:
    0.010295319 = weight(_text_:a in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010295319 = score(doc=7797,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
    0.12819354 = weight(_text_:70 in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12819354 = score(doc=7797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.4732989 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Despite the extensive use of automation for archive management the creation of ISAD(G) (General International Standard Archival Description) was only accepted in January 1992. A special adaptation of the ISBD had already enabled a start to be made on creating MARC format records for archive collections. ISAD(G) will facilitate the exchange of data among collections. Whether the new standard will be suitable for all forms of archive depends on the willingness of archivists to adopt new technology
    Source
    Bibliotheek- en Archiefgids. 70(1994) no.1, S.2-9
    Type
    a
  4. Ungváry, R.; Király, P.: Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen (2021) 0.07 
    0.06706877 = product of:
  0.13413754 = sum of:
    0.0059440047 = weight(_text_:a in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059440047 = score(doc=371,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
    0.12819354 = weight(_text_:70 in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12819354 = score(doc=371,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.4732989 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Type
    a
  5. MAB2 : Maschinelles Austauschformat für Bibliotheken (1995) 0.06 
    0.06409677 = product of:
  0.25638708 = sum of:
    0.25638708 = weight(_text_:70 in 4298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25638708 = score(doc=4298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.9465978 = fieldWeight in 4298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4298)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Isbn
    3-922051-70-7
  6. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.05 
    0.05156631 = product of:
  0.10313262 = sum of:
    0.014559779 = weight(_text_:a in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014559779 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
    0.08857284 = sum of:
      0.033748273 = weight(_text_:information in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033748273 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.054824565 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054824565 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
    Type
    a
  7. Brintzinger, K.-R.: Berichte und Beiträge zu einer Veranstaltung des VDB-Regionalverbandes Südwest : Amerikanische Standards für das deutsche Bibliothekswesen? (2002) 0.05 
    0.05030158 = product of:
  0.10060316 = sum of:
    0.0044580037 = weight(_text_:a in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044580037 = score(doc=1091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
    0.09614516 = weight(_text_:70 in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09614516 = score(doc=1091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27085114 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.35497418 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.354766 = idf(docFreq=567, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Seit fast einem Jahr beherrscht die Diskussion um die mögliche Ablösung des Regelwerkes RAK die Diskussion in der bibliothekarischen Fachpresse und in den einschlägigen Mailinglisten. Nach vielen - teilweise missverständlichen - Wortmeldungen und Diskussionsbeiträgen stellt sich dabei die Frage nach dem eigentlichen Kern der Diskussion. Diesen aufzugreifen, hatte sich der Regionalverband Südwest des Vereins Deutscher Bibliothekare (VDB) im Rahmen einer Fortbildungsveranstaltung am 10. Juli in der Württembergischen Landesbibliothek Stuttgart vorgenommen. Der Charakter einer Fortbildungsveranstaltung eines Berufsverbandes - frei von dem Zwang zu Entscheidungen - ermöglichte beides: Eine fachliche Einführung in die komplexe Thematik auf hohem Niveau, wofür der VDB-Regionalverband Südwest kompetente und mit den einzelnen Sachfragen bestens vertraute Referenten - ganz überwiegend aus der Südwest-Region - gewinnen konnte wie auch eine sehr engagierte, aber durchweg konstruktive Diskussion. Der relativ kurzfristig ausgesprochenen Einladung waren über 70 Teilnehmer gefolgt, die - trotz der regionalen Ausrichtung der Tagung - z.T. weite Anreisen auf sich genommen hatten.
    Type
    a
  8. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.04 
    0.044452906 = product of:
  0.08890581 = sum of:
    0.009008404 = weight(_text_:a in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009008404 = score(doc=5100,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.0798974 = sum of:
      0.012055466 = weight(_text_:information in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012055466 = score(doc=5100,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.06784194 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06784194 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
    Type
    a
  9. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.04 
    0.043611296 = product of:
  0.08722259 = sum of:
    0.0073553314 = weight(_text_:a in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073553314 = score(doc=6523,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
    0.07986726 = sum of:
      0.031895764 = weight(_text_:information in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031895764 = score(doc=6523,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.047971494 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047971494 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
    Type
    a
  10. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.04 
    0.040126573 = product of:
  0.08025315 = sum of:
    0.0059440047 = weight(_text_:a in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059440047 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
    0.07430914 = sum of:
      0.019484574 = weight(_text_:information in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019484574 = score(doc=1757,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.054824565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054824565 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
    Type
    a
  11. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.04 
    0.03962709 = product of:
  0.07925418 = sum of:
    0.010402009 = weight(_text_:a in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010402009 = score(doc=4750,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
    0.06885217 = sum of:
      0.02088068 = weight(_text_:information in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02088068 = score(doc=4750,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
      0.047971494 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047971494 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
    Type
    a
  12. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.04 
    0.039390534 = product of:
  0.07878107 = sum of:
    0.013760565 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013760565 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
    0.0650205 = sum of:
      0.017049003 = weight(_text_:information in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017049003 = score(doc=2848,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.047971494 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047971494 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  13. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.04 
    0.03850417 = product of:
  0.07700834 = sum of:
    0.008406092 = weight(_text_:a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008406092 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.06860224 = sum of:
      0.013777675 = weight(_text_:information in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013777675 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.054824565 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054824565 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses how archivists use the MARC AMC format to exchange information about archival materials. The paper explains the modifications that MARC AMC introduced to the MARC bibliographic formats; gives examples of a record in generic USMARC AMC, RLIN AMC, and OCLC AMC; and considers the possible impact of format integration. The paper concludes with some thoughts about the changes that MARC AMC is causing in the archival profession.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
    Type
    a
  14. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.04 
    0.03810375 = product of:
  0.0762075 = sum of:
    0.0073553314 = weight(_text_:a in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073553314 = score(doc=7683,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.06885217 = sum of:
      0.02088068 = weight(_text_:information in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02088068 = score(doc=7683,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.047971494 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047971494 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  15. Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009) 0.04 
    0.037014455 = product of:
  0.07402891 = sum of:
    0.009008404 = weight(_text_:a in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009008404 = score(doc=3844,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
    0.0650205 = sum of:
      0.017049003 = weight(_text_:information in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017049003 = score(doc=3844,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
      0.047971494 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047971494 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:53
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
    Type
    a
  16. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.03 
    0.033691145 = product of:
  0.06738229 = sum of:
    0.0073553314 = weight(_text_:a in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073553314 = score(doc=8779,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
    0.06002696 = sum of:
      0.012055466 = weight(_text_:information in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012055466 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
      0.047971494 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047971494 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  17. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03 
    0.033533122 = product of:
  0.067066245 = sum of:
    0.008916007 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008916007 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.058150236 = product of:
      0.11630047 = sum of:
        0.11630047 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11630047 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05058132 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  18. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000) 0.03 
    0.031726673 = product of:
  0.06345335 = sum of:
    0.0077214893 = weight(_text_:a in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077214893 = score(doc=1183,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
    0.055731855 = sum of:
      0.014613431 = weight(_text_:information in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014613431 = score(doc=1183,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.041118424 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041118424 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The following discussion is in appreciation of the invaluable inspirations Pauline Cochrane, by her acumen and perspicacity, has implanted into my thinking regarding various applications of library and information science, especially those involving machine-readable records and subject categorization. It is indeed an honor for me at my age to be offered to contribute to Pauline's Festschrift when instead I should be concerned about my forthcoming obituary. In the following, I must give some Background to what formed my thinking before my involvement in the field and thus before I encountered Pauline.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Type
    a
  19. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.03 
    0.030710042 = product of:
  0.061420083 = sum of:
    0.0099684 = weight(_text_:a in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0099684 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.051451683 = sum of:
      0.010333257 = weight(_text_:information in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010333257 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.041118424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041118424 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
    Type
    a
  20. McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009) 0.03 
    0.030710042 = product of:
  0.061420083 = sum of:
    0.0099684 = weight(_text_:a in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0099684 = score(doc=3841,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05832264 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05058132 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
    0.051451683 = sum of:
      0.010333257 = weight(_text_:information in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010333257 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.088794395 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
      0.041118424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041118424 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17712717 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05058132 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:38
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 21
  • el 14
  • s 11
  • n 4
  • x 4
  • l 3
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications