Search (376 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01
    0.009352934 = product of:
      0.0280588 = sum of:
        0.0052465936 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052465936 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
        0.022812206 = product of:
          0.068436615 = sum of:
            0.068436615 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068436615 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  2. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01
    0.008313378 = product of:
      0.024940135 = sum of:
        0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006121026 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
        0.018819109 = product of:
          0.056457322 = sum of:
            0.056457322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056457322 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
    Type
    a
  3. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.01
    0.008313378 = product of:
      0.024940135 = sum of:
        0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006121026 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
        0.018819109 = product of:
          0.056457322 = sum of:
            0.056457322 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056457322 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  4. Temmerman, P.: ISAD(G): de definitieve standaard? (1994) 0.01
    0.008204988 = product of:
      0.024614964 = sum of:
        0.006058245 = weight(_text_:a in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006058245 = score(doc=7797,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
        0.01855672 = product of:
          0.07422688 = sum of:
            0.07422688 = weight(_text_:g in 7797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07422688 = score(doc=7797,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.663964 = fieldWeight in 7797, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7797)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the extensive use of automation for archive management the creation of ISAD(G) (General International Standard Archival Description) was only accepted in January 1992. A special adaptation of the ISBD had already enabled a start to be made on creating MARC format records for archive collections. ISAD(G) will facilitate the exchange of data among collections. Whether the new standard will be suitable for all forms of archive depends on the willingness of archivists to adopt new technology
    Object
    ISAD(G)
    Type
    a
  5. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.007925263 = product of:
      0.023775788 = sum of:
        0.008567652 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008567652 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.015208136 = product of:
          0.04562441 = sum of:
            0.04562441 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04562441 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  6. Süle, G.: ¬Die Vereinheitlichung von Datenformaten im internationalen Bereich (1991) 0.01
    0.007452719 = product of:
      0.022358157 = sum of:
        0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 4418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006121026 = score(doc=4418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4418)
        0.01623713 = product of:
          0.06494852 = sum of:
            0.06494852 = weight(_text_:g in 4418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06494852 = score(doc=4418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 4418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4418)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Hädrich, G.: Unreglementierte Gedanken zur Weiterentwicklung des Regelwerks für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1996) 0.01
    0.007452719 = product of:
      0.022358157 = sum of:
        0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006121026 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
        0.01623713 = product of:
          0.06494852 = sum of:
            0.06494852 = weight(_text_:g in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06494852 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.5809685 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.0064404756 = product of:
      0.019321427 = sum of:
        0.008567652 = weight(_text_:a in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008567652 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
    Type
    a
  9. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01
    0.0064404756 = product of:
      0.019321427 = sum of:
        0.008567652 = weight(_text_:a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008567652 = score(doc=562,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
    Type
    a
  10. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01
    0.0062352885 = product of:
      0.018705865 = sum of:
        0.003497729 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003497729 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
        0.015208136 = product of:
          0.04562441 = sum of:
            0.04562441 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04562441 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
    Type
    a
  11. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01
    0.006202695 = product of:
      0.018608084 = sum of:
        0.005300964 = weight(_text_:a in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005300964 = score(doc=5100,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
        0.01330712 = product of:
          0.03992136 = sum of:
            0.03992136 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03992136 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
    Type
    a
  12. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.0059381276 = product of:
      0.017814383 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
        0.013442221 = product of:
          0.040326662 = sum of:
            0.040326662 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040326662 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
    Type
    a
  13. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01
    0.0059381276 = product of:
      0.017814383 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
        0.013442221 = product of:
          0.040326662 = sum of:
            0.040326662 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040326662 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
    Type
    a
  14. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.005916412 = product of:
      0.017749235 = sum of:
        0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006995458 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  15. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.01
    0.005916412 = product of:
      0.017749235 = sum of:
        0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006995458 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  16. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.01
    0.0058356375 = product of:
      0.017506912 = sum of:
        0.008097357 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008097357 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
        0.009409554 = product of:
          0.028228661 = sum of:
            0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028228661 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  17. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.01
    0.0058356375 = product of:
      0.017506912 = sum of:
        0.008097357 = weight(_text_:a in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008097357 = score(doc=2425,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.009409554 = product of:
          0.028228661 = sum of:
            0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028228661 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
    Type
    a
  18. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.0056040073 = product of:
      0.01681202 = sum of:
        0.006058245 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006058245 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a
  19. Meßmer, G.; Müller, M.: Standards in der Formalerschließung gedruckter und elektronischer Ressourcen (2015) 0.01
    0.0053233705 = product of:
      0.01597011 = sum of:
        0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0043721613 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
        0.01159795 = product of:
          0.0463918 = sum of:
            0.0463918 = weight(_text_:g in 1143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0463918 = score(doc=1143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1143)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01
    0.0052334378 = product of:
      0.015700312 = sum of:
        0.004946536 = weight(_text_:a in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004946536 = score(doc=2861,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
        0.010753776 = product of:
          0.032261327 = sum of:
            0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032261327 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029764405 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 17
  • el 14
  • s 10
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…