Search (297 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.01 
    0.009501004 = product of:
  0.02850301 = sum of:
    0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006995458 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
    0.021507552 = product of:
      0.064522654 = sum of:
        0.064522654 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064522654 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
    Type
    a
  2. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.01 
    0.008313378 = product of:
  0.024940135 = sum of:
    0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006121026 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
    0.018819109 = product of:
      0.056457322 = sum of:
        0.056457322 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056457322 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Type
    a
  3. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.007925263 = product of:
  0.023775788 = sum of:
    0.008567652 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008567652 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.015208136 = product of:
      0.04562441 = sum of:
        0.04562441 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04562441 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  4. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.01 
    0.0066774148 = product of:
  0.0133548295 = sum of:
    0.0045907698 = weight(_text_:a in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045907698 = score(doc=2668,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.13376464 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    0.0040592826 = product of:
      0.01623713 = sum of:
        0.01623713 = weight(_text_:g in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01623713 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.14524212 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.004704777 = product of:
      0.0141143305 = sum of:
        0.0141143305 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0141143305 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
  5. Apps, A.; MacIntyre, R.; Heery, R.; Patel, M.; Salokhe, G.: Zetoc : a Dublin Core Based Current Awareness Service (2002) 0.01 
    0.0063902526 = product of:
  0.019170757 = sum of:
    0.0075728064 = weight(_text_:a in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075728064 = score(doc=1280,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
    0.01159795 = product of:
      0.0463918 = sum of:
        0.0463918 = weight(_text_:g in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0463918 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Type
    a
  6. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01 
    0.0061916457 = product of:
  0.018574936 = sum of:
    0.00782116 = weight(_text_:a in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00782116 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
    0.010753776 = product of:
      0.032261327 = sum of:
        0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032261327 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Type
    a
  7. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01 
    0.005916412 = product of:
  0.017749235 = sum of:
    0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006995458 = score(doc=767,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.010753776 = product of:
      0.032261327 = sum of:
        0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032261327 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
    Type
    a
  8. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.005916412 = product of:
  0.017749235 = sum of:
    0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006995458 = score(doc=2834,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
    0.010753776 = product of:
      0.032261327 = sum of:
        0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032261327 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
    Type
    a
  9. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.01 
    0.0058356375 = product of:
  0.017506912 = sum of:
    0.008097357 = weight(_text_:a in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008097357 = score(doc=2848,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
    0.009409554 = product of:
      0.028228661 = sum of:
        0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028228661 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
    Type
    a
  10. White, H.C.; Carrier, S.; Thompson, A.; Greenberg, J.; Scherle, R.: ¬The Dryad Data Repository : a Singapore framework metadata architecture in a DSpace environment (2008) 0.01 
    0.005635417 = product of:
  0.01690625 = sum of:
    0.007496695 = weight(_text_:a in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007496695 = score(doc=2592,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
    0.009409554 = product of:
      0.028228661 = sum of:
        0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028228661 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This report presents recent metadata developments for Dryad, a digital repository hosting datasets underlying publications in the field of evolutionary biology. We review our efforts to bring the Dryad application profile into conformance with the Singapore Framework and discuss practical issues underlying the application profile implementation in a DSpace environment. The report concludes by outlining the next steps planned as Dryad moves into the next phase of development.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Type
    a
  11. El-Sherbini, M.: Metadata and the future of cataloging (2001) 0.01 
    0.0056040073 = product of:
  0.01681202 = sum of:
    0.006058245 = weight(_text_:a in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006058245 = score(doc=751,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
    0.010753776 = product of:
      0.032261327 = sum of:
        0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032261327 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article is a survey of representative metadata efforts comparing them to MARC 21 metadata in order to determine if new electronic formats require the development of a new set of standards. This study surveys the ongoing metadata projects in order to identify what types of metadata exist and how they are used and also compares and analyzes selected metadata elements in an attempt to illustrate how they are related to MARC 21 metadata format elements.
    Date
    23. 1.2007 11:22:30
    Type
    a
  12. Agnew, G.: Developing a metadata strategy (2003) 0.01 
    0.0054246066 = product of:
  0.016273819 = sum of:
    0.006995458 = weight(_text_:a in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006995458 = score(doc=5504,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
    0.00927836 = product of:
      0.03711344 = sum of:
        0.03711344 = weight(_text_:g in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03711344 = score(doc=5504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.331982 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper covers the steps in building a metadata repository, including modeling the information needs of your community, selecting and adapting a metadata standard, documenting your metadata, populating the database, and sharing your metadata with other repositories and metadata initiatives. In addition, advances and options that can be applied to metadata for multimedia, particularly video, are presented.
    Type
    a
  13. Warner, S.: E-prints and the Open Archives Initiative (2003) 0.01 
    0.0054176897 = product of:
  0.016253069 = sum of:
    0.006843515 = weight(_text_:a in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006843515 = score(doc=4772,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
    0.009409554 = product of:
      0.028228661 = sum of:
        0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028228661 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The Open Archives Initiative (OAI) was created as a practical way to promote interoperability between e-print repositories. Although the scope of the OAI has been broadened, e-print repositories still represent a significant fraction of OAI data providers. This article presents a brief survey of OAI e-print repositories, and of services using metadata harvested from e-print repositories using the OAI protocol for metadata harvesting (OAI-PMH). It then discusses several situations where metadata harvesting may be used to further improve the utility of e-print archives as a component of the scholarly communication infrastructure.
    Date
    18.12.2005 13:18:22
    Type
    a
  14. Baker, T.; Dekkers, M.; Heery, R.; Patel, M.; Salokhe, G.: What Terms Does Your Metadata Use? : Application Profiles as Machine-Understandable Narratives (2002) 0.01 
    0.0053233705 = product of:
  0.01597011 = sum of:
    0.0043721613 = weight(_text_:a in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043721613 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
    0.01159795 = product of:
      0.0463918 = sum of:
        0.0463918 = weight(_text_:g in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0463918 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11179353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Type
    a
  15. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.0052334378 = product of:
  0.015700312 = sum of:
    0.004946536 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004946536 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
    0.010753776 = product of:
      0.032261327 = sum of:
        0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032261327 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper provides an introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), a MARC21 compatible XML schema for descriptive metadata. It explains the requirements that the schema targets and the special features that differentiate it from MARC, such as user-oriented tags, regrouped data elements, linking, recursion, and accommodations for electronic resources.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
    Type
    a
  16. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.01 
    0.0052334378 = product of:
  0.015700312 = sum of:
    0.004946536 = weight(_text_:a in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004946536 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
    0.010753776 = product of:
      0.032261327 = sum of:
        0.032261327 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032261327 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  17. Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0051768604 = product of:
  0.015530581 = sum of:
    0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006121026 = score(doc=2837,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
    0.009409554 = product of:
      0.028228661 = sum of:
        0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028228661 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
    Type
    a
  18. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.01 
    0.0051768604 = product of:
  0.015530581 = sum of:
    0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006121026 = score(doc=4750,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
    0.009409554 = product of:
      0.028228661 = sum of:
        0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028228661 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
    Type
    a
  19. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.01 
    0.0051768604 = product of:
  0.015530581 = sum of:
    0.006121026 = weight(_text_:a in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006121026 = score(doc=180,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
    0.009409554 = product of:
      0.028228661 = sum of:
        0.028228661 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028228661 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  20. Méndez, E.; López, L.M.; Siches, A.; Bravo, A.G.: DCMF: DC & Microformats, a good marriage (2008) 0.01 
    0.005161712 = product of:
  0.015485136 = sum of:
    0.007419804 = weight(_text_:a in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007419804 = score(doc=2634,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.034319755 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029764405 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
    0.008065332 = product of:
      0.024195995 = sum of:
        0.024195995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024195995 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.104229875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029764405 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This report introduces the Dublin Core Microformats (DCMF) project, a new way to use the DC element set within X/HTML. The DC microformats encode explicit semantic expressions in an X/HTML webpage, by using a specific list of terms for values of the attributes "rev" and "rel" for <a> and <link> elements, and "class" and "id" of other elements. Microformats can be easily processed by user agents and software, enabling a high level of interoperability. These characteristics are crucial for the growing number of social applications allowing users to participate in the Web 2.0 environment as information creators and consumers. This report reviews the origins of microformats; illustrates the coding of DC microformats using the Dublin Core Metadata Gen tool, and a Firefox extension for extraction and visualization; and discusses the benefits of creating Web services utilizing DC microformats.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 271
  • el 37
  • m 9
  • s 8
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications