Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"MacFarlane, A."
  1. MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.0141583625 = product of:
      0.028316725 = sum of:
        0.028316725 = product of:
          0.05663345 = sum of:
            0.05663345 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05663345 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 18:30:22
  2. MacFarlane, A.; McCann, J.A.; Robertson, S.E.: Parallel methods for the generation of partitioned inverted files (2005) 0.01
    0.0073736827 = product of:
      0.014747365 = sum of:
        0.014747365 = product of:
          0.02949473 = sum of:
            0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02949473 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 57(2005) no.5, S.434-459
  3. MacFarlane, A.: Evaluation of web search for the information practitioner (2007) 0.01
    0.0073736827 = product of:
      0.014747365 = sum of:
        0.014747365 = product of:
          0.02949473 = sum of:
            0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02949473 = score(doc=817,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 59(2007) no.4/5, S.352-366
  4. MacFarlane, A.; McCann, J.A.; Robertson, S.E.: Parallel methods for the update of partitioned inverted files (2007) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 59(2007) no.4/5, S.367-396
  5. Inskip, C.; MacFarlane, A.; Rafferty, P.: Meaning, communication, music : towards a revised communication model (2008) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 2347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=2347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 2347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.5, S.687-706
  6. Lu, W.; MacFarlane, A.; Venuti, F.: Okapi-based XML indexing (2009) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 61(2009) no.5, S.483-499
  7. Inskip, C.; MacFarlane, A.; Rafferty, P.: Organising music for movies (2010) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) nos.4/5, S.489-501
  8. MacFarlane, A.; Missaoui, S.; Frankowska-Takhari, S.: On machine learning and knowledge organization in multimedia information retrieval (2020) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recent technological developments have increased the use of machine learning to solve many problems, including many in information retrieval. Multimedia information retrieval as a problem represents a significant challenge to machine learning as a technological solution, but some problems can still be addressed by using appropriate AI techniques. We review the technological developments and provide a perspective on the use of machine learning in conjunction with knowledge organization to address multimedia IR needs. The semantic gap in multimedia IR remains a significant problem in the field, and solutions to them are many years off. However, new technological developments allow the use of knowledge organization and machine learning in multimedia search systems and services. Specifically, we argue that, the improvement of detection of some classes of lowlevel features in images music and video can be used in conjunction with knowledge organization to tag or label multimedia content for better retrieval performance. We provide an overview of the use of knowledge organization schemes in machine learning and make recommendations to information professionals on the use of this technology with knowledge organization techniques to solve multimedia IR problems. We introduce a five-step process model that extracts features from multimedia objects (Step 1) from both knowledge organization (Step 1a) and machine learning (Step 1b), merging them together (Step 2) to create an index of those multimedia objects (Step 3). We also overview further steps in creating an application to utilize the multimedia objects (Step 4) and maintaining and updating the database of features on those objects (Step 5).
  9. Berget, G.; MacFarlane, A.: What Is known about the impact of impairments on information seeking and searching? (2020) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 5817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=5817,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 5817, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5817)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.5, S.596-611
  10. MacFarlane, A.; Missaoui, S.; Makri, S.; Gutierrez Lopez, M.: Sender vs. recipient-orientated information systems revisited (2022) 0.00
    0.0049157883 = product of:
      0.009831577 = sum of:
        0.009831577 = product of:
          0.019663153 = sum of:
            0.019663153 = weight(_text_:5 in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019663153 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.128963 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2022 17:09:06