Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Saracevic, T."
  1. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.017697955 = product of:
      0.03539591 = sum of:
        0.03539591 = product of:
          0.07079182 = sum of:
            0.07079182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07079182 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18297131 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  2. Saracevic, T.: ¬A research project on classification of questions in information retrieval : preliminary work (1980) 0.01
    0.012289471 = product of:
      0.024578942 = sum of:
        0.024578942 = product of:
          0.049157884 = sum of:
            0.049157884 = weight(_text_:5 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049157884 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.32240748 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Communicating information : proceedings of the 43rd Asis annual meeting, Anaheim, California, October 5-10, 1980. Eds.: Alan R Benenfeld u. Edward John Kazlauskas
  3. Saracevic, T.: Why is relevance still the basic notion in information science? (2015) 0.01
    0.012289471 = product of:
      0.024578942 = sum of:
        0.024578942 = product of:
          0.049157884 = sum of:
            0.049157884 = weight(_text_:5 in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049157884 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.32240748 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2016 19:56:32
  4. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Human-computer interaction in information retrieval : nature and manifestations of feedback (1998) 0.01
    0.008602629 = product of:
      0.017205259 = sum of:
        0.017205259 = product of:
          0.034410518 = sum of:
            0.034410518 = weight(_text_:5 in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034410518 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.22568524 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Develops a theoretical framework for expressing the nature of feedback as a critical process in interactive information retrieval. Feedback concepts from cybernetics and social sciences perspectives are used to develop a concept of information feedback applicable to information retrieval. Adapts models from human-computer interaction and interactive information retrieval as a framework for studying the manifestations of feedback in information retrieval. Presents results from an empirical study of real-life interactions between users, professional mediators and an information retrieval system computer. Presents data involving 885 feedback loops classified in 5 categories. Presents a connection between the theoretical framework and empirical observations and provides a number of pragmatic and research suggestions
  5. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Interaction in information retrieval : selection and effectiveness of search terms (1997) 0.01
    0.0073736827 = product of:
      0.014747365 = sum of:
        0.014747365 = product of:
          0.02949473 = sum of:
            0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02949473 = score(doc=206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We investigated the sources and effectiveness of search terms used during mediated on-line searching under real-life (as opposed to laboratory) circumstances. A stratified model of information retrieval (IR) interaction served as a framework for the analysis. For the analysis, we used the on-line transaction logs, videotapes, and transcribed dialogue of the presearch and on-line interaction between 40 users and 4 professional intermediaries. Each user provided one question and interacted with one of the four intermediaries. Searching was done using DIALOG. Five sources of search terms were identified: (1) the users' written question statements, (2) terms derived from users' domain knowledge during the interaction, (3) terms extracted from retrieved items as relevance feedback, (4) database thesaurus, and (5) terms derived by intermediaries during the interaction. Distribution, retrieval effectiveness, transition sequences, and correlation of search terms from different sources were investigated. Search terms from users' written question statements and term relevance feedback were the most productive sources of terms contributing to the retrieval of items judged relevant by users. Implications of the findings are discussed
  6. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part II: Methodology and taxonomy (1997) 0.01
    0.0073736827 = product of:
      0.014747365 = sum of:
        0.014747365 = product of:
          0.02949473 = sum of:
            0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02949473 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Details with specifics of the study: importance of taxonomy; the method used for gathering data on user assessments of value in 5 research libraries, involving 18 services and 528 interviews with users; development and presentation of the taxonomy; and statistics and tests of the taxonomy. A novel aspect is the division of value of information services into 3 general classes or facets; reasons for use of a service in the given instance; quality of interaction (use) related to that service; and worth, benefits, or implications of subsequent results from use
  7. Saracevic, T.: Information science (2009) 0.01
    0.0073736827 = product of:
      0.014747365 = sum of:
        0.014747365 = product of:
          0.02949473 = sum of:
            0.02949473 = weight(_text_:5 in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02949473 = score(doc=3812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.19344449 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2010 17:33:43
  8. Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999) 0.01
    0.0061447355 = product of:
      0.012289471 = sum of:
        0.012289471 = product of:
          0.024578942 = sum of:
            0.024578942 = weight(_text_:5 in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024578942 = score(doc=6711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15247129 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052250203 = queryNorm
                0.16120374 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.9180994 = idf(docFreq=6494, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In anticipation of the explosive growth of digital libraries, a complex study was undertaken seeking to evaluate 21 diverse services at 5 major academic research libraries. This work stands as a model for evaluation of digital libraries, through its focus on both the costs of operations and the impacts of the services that those operations provide. The data have been analyzed using both statistical methods and methods of Data Envelopment Analysis. The results of the study, which are presented in detail, serve to demonstrate that a cross-functional approach to library services is feasible. They also highlight a new measure of impact, which is a weighted logarithmic combination of the amount of time that users spend interacting with the service, combined with a Likert-scale indication of the value of that service in relation to the time expended. The measure derived, incorporating simple information obtainable from the user, together with information which is readily available in server/client logs, provides an excellent foundation for transferring these measurement principles to the Digital Library environment