Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029231926 = product of:
      0.058463853 = sum of:
        0.058463853 = product of:
          0.116927706 = sum of:
            0.116927706 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.116927706 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  2. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.027560122 = product of:
      0.055120245 = sum of:
        0.055120245 = product of:
          0.11024049 = sum of:
            0.11024049 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11024049 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.027560122 = product of:
      0.055120245 = sum of:
        0.055120245 = product of:
          0.11024049 = sum of:
            0.11024049 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11024049 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. Zeng, M.L.: Metadata elements for object description and representaion : a case report from a digitized historical fashion collection project (1999) 0.02
    0.02435904 = product of:
      0.04871808 = sum of:
        0.04871808 = product of:
          0.09743616 = sum of:
            0.09743616 = weight(_text_:90 in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09743616 = score(doc=4055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.3563897 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This project's goal is to develop a catalog for a digitized collection of historical fashion objects held at the Kent State University Museum and to analyze and evaluate how well existing metadata formats can be applied to a fashion collection. The project considered the known and anticipated uses of the collection and the identification of the metadata elements that would be needed to support these uses. From a set of 90 museum accession records, 42 fashion objects were selected for cataloging. 2 metadata treatments were created for these 42 items using (a) AACR in use with USMARC formats, (b) the Dublic Core set of elements designed for minimal level cataloging, and (c) the Visual Resources Association (VRA) Core Categories for Visual Resources created for developing local databases and cataloging records for visual resource collections. Comparison and analysis of the formats resulted in the adoption of a modified VRA metadata format to catalog the entire digitized historical fashion collection
  5. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.024115108 = product of:
      0.048230216 = sum of:
        0.048230216 = product of:
          0.09646043 = sum of:
            0.09646043 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09646043 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024115108 = product of:
      0.048230216 = sum of:
        0.048230216 = product of:
          0.09646043 = sum of:
            0.09646043 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09646043 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024115108 = product of:
      0.048230216 = sum of:
        0.048230216 = product of:
          0.09646043 = sum of:
            0.09646043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09646043 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  8. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.020670092 = product of:
      0.041340183 = sum of:
        0.041340183 = product of:
          0.08268037 = sum of:
            0.08268037 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08268037 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  9. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.019487951 = product of:
      0.038975902 = sum of:
        0.038975902 = product of:
          0.077951804 = sum of:
            0.077951804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077951804 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  10. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.019487951 = product of:
      0.038975902 = sum of:
        0.038975902 = product of:
          0.077951804 = sum of:
            0.077951804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077951804 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  11. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.02
    0.017225077 = product of:
      0.034450155 = sum of:
        0.034450155 = product of:
          0.06890031 = sum of:
            0.06890031 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06890031 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  12. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.02
    0.017225077 = product of:
      0.034450155 = sum of:
        0.034450155 = product of:
          0.06890031 = sum of:
            0.06890031 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06890031 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  13. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.017225077 = product of:
      0.034450155 = sum of:
        0.034450155 = product of:
          0.06890031 = sum of:
            0.06890031 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06890031 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  14. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.02
    0.017225077 = product of:
      0.034450155 = sum of:
        0.034450155 = product of:
          0.06890031 = sum of:
            0.06890031 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06890031 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  15. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.02
    0.017225077 = product of:
      0.034450155 = sum of:
        0.034450155 = product of:
          0.06890031 = sum of:
            0.06890031 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06890031 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  16. Chen, J.; Wang, D.; Xie, I.; Lu, Q.: Image annotation tactics : transitions, strategies and efficiency (2018) 0.02
    0.016239362 = product of:
      0.032478724 = sum of:
        0.032478724 = product of:
          0.06495745 = sum of:
            0.06495745 = weight(_text_:90 in 5046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06495745 = score(doc=5046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.23759314 = fieldWeight in 5046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Human interpretation of images during image annotation is complicated, but most existing interactive image annotation systems are generally operated based on social tagging, while ignoring that tags are insufficient to convey image semantics. Hence, it is critical to study the nature of image annotation behaviors and process. This study investigated annotation tactics, transitions, strategies and their efficiency during the image annotation process. A total of 90 participants were recruited to annotate nine pictures in three emotional dimensions with three interactive annotation methods. Data collected from annotation logs and verbal protocols were analyzed by applying both qualitative and quantitative methods. The findings of this study show that the cognitive process of human interpretation of images is rather complex, which reveals a probable bias in research involving image relevance feedback. Participants preferred applying scroll bar (Scr) and image comparison (Cim) tactics comparing with rating tactic (Val), and they did fewer fine tuning activities, which reflects the influence of perceptual level and users' cognitive load during image annotation. Annotation tactic transition analysis showed that Cim was more likely to be adopted at the beginning of each phase, and the most remarkable transition was from Cim to Scr. By applying sequence analysis, the authors found 10 most commonly used sequences representing four types of annotation strategies, including Single tactic strategy, Tactic combination strategy, Fix mode strategy and Shift mode strategy. Furthermore, two patterns, "quarter decreasing" and "transition cost," were identified based on time data, and both multiple tactics (e.g., the combination of Cim and Scr) and fine tuning activities were recognized as efficient tactic applications. Annotation patterns found in this study suggest more research needs to be done considering the need for multi-interactive methods and their influence. The findings of this study generated detailed and useful guidance for the interactive design in image annotation systems, including recommending efficient tactic applications in different phases, highlighting the most frequently applied tactics and transitions, and avoiding unnecessary transitions.
  17. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.01
    0.013780061 = product of:
      0.027560122 = sum of:
        0.027560122 = product of:
          0.055120245 = sum of:
            0.055120245 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055120245 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
  18. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.013780061 = product of:
      0.027560122 = sum of:
        0.027560122 = product of:
          0.055120245 = sum of:
            0.055120245 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055120245 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  19. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01
    0.013780061 = product of:
      0.027560122 = sum of:
        0.027560122 = product of:
          0.055120245 = sum of:
            0.055120245 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055120245 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  20. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01
    0.013780061 = product of:
      0.027560122 = sum of:
        0.027560122 = product of:
          0.055120245 = sum of:
            0.055120245 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055120245 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 76
  • d 9
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 80
  • el 5
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…