Search (700 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.08 
    0.08095287 = product of:
  0.16190574 = sum of:
    0.16190574 = sum of:
      0.11367553 = weight(_text_:90 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11367553 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.415788 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048230216 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
  2. Pany, T.: Konfusion in der Medienrepublik : Der Überraschungseffekt der Youtuber (2019) 0.08 
    0.08095287 = product of:
  0.16190574 = sum of:
    0.16190574 = sum of:
      0.11367553 = weight(_text_:90 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11367553 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.415788 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
      0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048230216 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Vor der EU-Wahl veröffentlichen 90 "Webstars" eine Wahlempfehlung: "Wählt nicht die CDU/CSU, wählt nicht die SPD und schon gar nicht die AfD". Die Reaktionen sind der eigentliche Aufreger. Bezug zu: https://youtu.be/4Y1lZQsyuSQ und https://youtu.be/Xpg84NjCr9c.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Dörner, S.:"CDU-Zerstörer" Rezo: Es kamen "Diskreditierung, Lügen, Trump-Wordings und keine inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung" [22. Mai 2019]. Interview mit Rezo. Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/CDU-Zerstoerer-Rezo-Es-kamen-Diskreditierung-Luegen-Trump-Wordings-und-keine-inhaltliche-4428522.html?view=print [http://www.heise.de/-4428522].
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.08076982 = product of:
  0.16153964 = sum of:
    0.16153964 = product of:
      0.4846189 = sum of:
        0.4846189 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4846189 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Lenzen, M.: Künstliche Intelligenz : was sie kann & was uns erwartet (2018) 0.07 
    0.07463989 = product of:
  0.14927977 = sum of:
    0.14927977 = sum of:
      0.11482962 = weight(_text_:90 in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11482962 = score(doc=4295,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.42000932 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
      0.034450155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034450155 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    EDV 90
    Date
    18. 6.2018 19:22:02
    SFB
    EDV 90
  5. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.07 
    0.06938817 = product of:
  0.13877635 = sum of:
    0.13877635 = sum of:
      0.09743616 = weight(_text_:90 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09743616 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.3563897 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.041340183 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041340183 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  6. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.06730819 = product of:
  0.13461637 = sum of:
    0.13461637 = product of:
      0.4038491 = sum of:
        0.4038491 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4038491 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  7. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.06 
    0.06495834 = product of:
  0.12991668 = sum of:
    0.12991668 = sum of:
      0.08119681 = weight(_text_:90 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08119681 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.29699144 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.048719876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048719876 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
  8. Hubrich, J.: Multilinguale Wissensorganisation im Zeitalter der Globalisierung : das Projekt CrissCross (2010) 0.06 
    0.05782348 = product of:
  0.11564696 = sum of:
    0.11564696 = sum of:
      0.08119681 = weight(_text_:90 in 4793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08119681 = score(doc=4793,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.29699144 = fieldWeight in 4793, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4793)
      0.034450155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034450155 = score(doc=4793,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4793, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4793)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.81-90
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013) 0.06 
    0.05782348 = product of:
  0.11564696 = sum of:
    0.11564696 = sum of:
      0.08119681 = weight(_text_:90 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08119681 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.29699144 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
      0.034450155 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034450155 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Several independent authors reported a high share of uncited publications, which include those produced by top scientists. This share was repeatedly reported to exceed 10% of the total papers produced, without any explanation of this phenomenon and the lack of difference in uncitedness between average and successful researchers. In this report, we analyze the uncitedness among two independent groups of highly visible scientists (mathematicians represented by Fields medalists, and researchers in physiology or medicine represented by Nobel Prize laureates in the respective field). Analysis of both groups led to the identical conclusion: over 90% of the uncited database records of highly visible scientists can be explained by the inclusion of editorial materials progress reports presented at international meetings (meeting abstracts), discussion items (letters to the editor, discussion), personalia (biographic items), and by errors of omission and commission of the Web of Science (WoS) database and of the citing documents. Only a marginal amount of original articles and reviews were found to be uncited (0.9 and 0.3%, respectively), which is in strong contrast with the previously reported data, which never addressed the document types among the uncited records.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:21:46
  10. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05 
    0.04711573 = product of:
  0.09423146 = sum of:
    0.09423146 = product of:
      0.28269437 = sum of:
        0.28269437 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28269437 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  11. Borchers, D.: Missing Link : Wenn der Kasten denkt - Niklas Luhmann und die Folgen (2017) 0.04 
    0.040598404 = product of:
  0.08119681 = sum of:
    0.08119681 = product of:
      0.16239361 = sum of:
        0.16239361 = weight(_text_:90 in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16239361 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.5939829 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Gerade haben die Soziologen den 90. Geburstag des Systemtheoretikers Niklas Luhmann gefeiert. Die Informatiker stecken mitten in einem anspruchsvollen Digitalisierungsprojekt, seinen Gedankenkasten, sein "hölzernes Privat-Internet", zu verdaten.
  12. Hensch, T.K.: ¬Das Gehirn neu verdrahten (2018) 0.04 
    0.040598404 = product of:
  0.08119681 = sum of:
    0.08119681 = product of:
      0.16239361 = sum of:
        0.16239361 = weight(_text_:90 in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16239361 = score(doc=4423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.5939829 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Gehirn & Geist Dossier. 2018. H.3, S.90-95
  13. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04 
    0.04038491 = product of:
  0.08076982 = sum of:
    0.08076982 = product of:
      0.24230945 = sum of:
        0.24230945 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24230945 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  14. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.04 
    0.04038491 = product of:
  0.08076982 = sum of:
    0.08076982 = product of:
      0.24230945 = sum of:
        0.24230945 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24230945 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  15. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.03 
    0.034694087 = product of:
  0.06938817 = sum of:
    0.06938817 = sum of:
      0.04871808 = weight(_text_:90 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04871808 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.17819485 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.020670092 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020670092 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050854117 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Bill Howe and his colleagues at the University of Washington, in Seattle, decided to find out. First, they trained a computer algorithm to distinguish between various sorts of figures-which they defined as diagrams, equations, photographs, plots (such as bar charts and scatter graphs) and tables. They exposed their algorithm to between 400 and 600 images of each of these types of figure until it could distinguish them with an accuracy greater than 90%. Then they set it loose on the more-than-650,000 papers (containing more than 10m figures) stored on PubMed Central, an online archive of biomedical-research articles. To measure each paper's influence, they calculated its article-level Eigenfactor score-a modified version of the PageRank algorithm Google uses to provide the most relevant results for internet searches. Eigenfactor scoring gives a better measure than simply noting the number of times a paper is cited elsewhere, because it weights citations by their influence. A citation in a paper that is itself highly cited is worth more than one in a paper that is not.
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  16. Wolf, S.: Neuer Meilenstein für BASE : 90 Millionen Dokumente (2016) 0.03 
    0.034448884 = product of:
  0.06889777 = sum of:
    0.06889777 = product of:
      0.13779554 = sum of:
        0.13779554 = weight(_text_:90 in 2872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13779554 = score(doc=2872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.50401115 = fieldWeight in 2872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2872)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    BASE (https://www.base-search.net) ermöglicht seit Anfang April eine Suche nach über 90 Millionen Dokumenten, deren Metadaten von über 4.200 Dokumentenservern (Repositories) wissenschaftlicher Institutionen weltweit bereit gestellt werden. Damit ist BASE nach Google Scholar die größte Suchmaschine für wissenschaftliche, frei im Internet verfügbare Dokumente. Für über 30 Mio. Dokumente, die in BASE zu finden sind, können wir aufgrund von Informationen in den Metadaten einen Open-Access-Status ausweisen, insgesamt schätzen wir den Open-Access-Anteil derzeit auf 60%. Über ein Boosting-Verfahren werden Nachweise zu Open-Access-Dokumenten bevorzugt angezeigt, ebenso ist ein gezieltes Suchen unter Berücksichtigung verschiedener Lizenz- und Rechteangaben möglich. Der BASE-Index steht über verschiedene Schnittstellen zahlreichen anderen kommerziellen und nicht-kommerziellen Discovery-Systemen, Suchmaschinen, Datenbankanbietern, Fachbibliotheken und Entwicklern zur Nachnutzung zur Verfügung. BASE trägt damit wesentlich zur Nutzung von Inhalten auf Dokumentservern bei. Weitere Informationen: https://www.base-search.net/
  17. Zweig, K.A.: ¬Ein Algorithmus hat kein Taktgefühl : wo Künstliche Intelligenz sich irrt, warum uns das betrifft und was wir dagegen tun können (2019) 0.03 
    0.034448884 = product of:
  0.06889777 = sum of:
    0.06889777 = product of:
      0.13779554 = sum of:
        0.13779554 = weight(_text_:90 in 5430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13779554 = score(doc=5430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.50401115 = fieldWeight in 5430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    EDV 90
    SFB
    EDV 90
  18. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.03 
    0.033654094 = product of:
  0.06730819 = sum of:
    0.06730819 = product of:
      0.20192455 = sum of:
        0.20192455 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20192455 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  19. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.03 
    0.033654094 = product of:
  0.06730819 = sum of:
    0.06730819 = product of:
      0.20192455 = sum of:
        0.20192455 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20192455 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  20. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.03 
    0.033654094 = product of:
  0.06730819 = sum of:
    0.06730819 = product of:
      0.20192455 = sum of:
        0.20192455 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20192455 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050854117 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

Authors

Languages

  • e 494
  • d 195
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 602
  • el 67
  • m 49
  • s 16
  • x 13
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications