Search (4157 results, page 2 of 208)

  1. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.08
    0.08095287 = product of:
      0.16190574 = sum of:
        0.16190574 = sum of:
          0.11367553 = weight(_text_:90 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11367553 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.415788 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048230216 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
  2. Pany, T.: Konfusion in der Medienrepublik : Der Überraschungseffekt der Youtuber (2019) 0.08
    0.08095287 = product of:
      0.16190574 = sum of:
        0.16190574 = sum of:
          0.11367553 = weight(_text_:90 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11367553 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.415788 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
          0.048230216 = weight(_text_:22 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048230216 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Vor der EU-Wahl veröffentlichen 90 "Webstars" eine Wahlempfehlung: "Wählt nicht die CDU/CSU, wählt nicht die SPD und schon gar nicht die AfD". Die Reaktionen sind der eigentliche Aufreger. Bezug zu: https://youtu.be/4Y1lZQsyuSQ und https://youtu.be/Xpg84NjCr9c.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Dörner, S.:"CDU-Zerstörer" Rezo: Es kamen "Diskreditierung, Lügen, Trump-Wordings und keine inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung" [22. Mai 2019]. Interview mit Rezo. Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/CDU-Zerstoerer-Rezo-Es-kamen-Diskreditierung-Luegen-Trump-Wordings-und-keine-inhaltliche-4428522.html?view=print [http://www.heise.de/-4428522].
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08
    0.08076982 = product of:
      0.16153964 = sum of:
        0.16153964 = product of:
          0.4846189 = sum of:
            0.4846189 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4846189 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Lenzen, M.: Künstliche Intelligenz : was sie kann & was uns erwartet (2018) 0.07
    0.07463989 = product of:
      0.14927977 = sum of:
        0.14927977 = sum of:
          0.11482962 = weight(_text_:90 in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11482962 = score(doc=4295,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.42000932 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
          0.034450155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034450155 = score(doc=4295,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    EDV 90
    Date
    18. 6.2018 19:22:02
    SFB
    EDV 90
  5. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.07
    0.06938817 = product of:
      0.13877635 = sum of:
        0.13877635 = sum of:
          0.09743616 = weight(_text_:90 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09743616 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.3563897 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.041340183 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041340183 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Form subdivisions have always been an important part of the Library of Congress Subject Headings. However, when the MARC format was developed, no separate subfield code to identify form subdivisions was defined. Form and topical subdivisions were both included within a general subdivision category. In 1995, the USMARC Advisory Group approved a proposal defining subfield v for form subdivisions, and in 1999 the Library of Congress (LC) began identifying form subdivisions with the new code. However, there are millions of older bibliographic records lacking the explicit form subdivision coding. Identifying form subdivisions retrospectively is not a simple task. An algorithmic method was developed to identify form subdivisions coded as general subdivisions. The algorithm was used to identify 2,563 unique form subdivisions or combinations of form subdivisions in OCLC's WorldCat. The algorithm proved to be highly accurate with an error rate estimated to be less than 0.1%. The observed usage of the form subdivisions was highly skewed with the 100 most used form subdivisions or combinations of subdivisions accounting for 90% of the assignments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.07
    0.06938817 = product of:
      0.13877635 = sum of:
        0.13877635 = sum of:
          0.09743616 = weight(_text_:90 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09743616 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.3563897 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.041340183 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041340183 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  7. #220 0.07
    0.06820783 = product of:
      0.13641566 = sum of:
        0.13641566 = product of:
          0.27283132 = sum of:
            0.27283132 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27283132 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  8. #1387 0.07
    0.06820783 = product of:
      0.13641566 = sum of:
        0.13641566 = product of:
          0.27283132 = sum of:
            0.27283132 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27283132 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  9. #2103 0.07
    0.06820783 = product of:
      0.13641566 = sum of:
        0.13641566 = product of:
          0.27283132 = sum of:
            0.27283132 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27283132 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  10. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07
    0.06730819 = product of:
      0.13461637 = sum of:
        0.13461637 = product of:
          0.4038491 = sum of:
            0.4038491 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4038491 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43114176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  11. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.06
    0.06495834 = product of:
      0.12991668 = sum of:
        0.12991668 = sum of:
          0.08119681 = weight(_text_:90 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08119681 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.29699144 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.048719876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048719876 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17808245 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050854117 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
  12. Walker, S.: Ease of use in online catalogues : a plea for the user (1986) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=375,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.79-90
  13. McGarry, D.: Report from the section on classification and indexing : 1989-90 (1990) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Wall, R.A.: Intelligent indexing and retrieval : a man-machine partnership (1980) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 16(1980), S.73-90
  15. OPACs and the user : Proc. of the 3rd Anglo-Nordic Seminar, Apr.90 (1991) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1990) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 2679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=2679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 2679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ASIS'90: Proc. 53rd ASIS Ann. Meeting, Toronto, 4.-8.11.1990
  17. Vickery, A.: Integrating thesauri into intelligent front-ends (1990) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 2683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=2683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 2683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ASIS'90: Proc. 53rd ASIS Ann. Meeting, Toronto, 4.-8.11.1990
  18. Klement, S.: Indexing standards : their relationship to indexing software (1990) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=2694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ASIS'90: Proc. 53rd ASIS Ann. Meeting, Toronto, 4.-8.11.1990
  19. Huston, M.M.; Williams, J.L.: Researchers response to the politics of information (1987) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research strategies. 5(1987), S.90-93
  20. Batty, C.D.: ¬An introduction to Colon Classification : a programmed text (1966) 0.06
    0.06495745 = product of:
      0.1299149 = sum of:
        0.1299149 = product of:
          0.2598298 = sum of:
            0.2598298 = weight(_text_:90 in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598298 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2733978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050854117 = queryNorm
                0.9503726 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.376119 = idf(docFreq=555, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    90 S

Languages

Types

  • a 3450
  • m 413
  • el 178
  • s 161
  • x 45
  • b 41
  • i 24
  • r 22
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications