Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.03
    0.034368586 = product of:
      0.06873717 = sum of:
        0.06873717 = sum of:
          0.026206357 = weight(_text_:20 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026206357 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05231876 = queryNorm
              0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.042530816 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042530816 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05231876 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017721174 = product of:
      0.03544235 = sum of:
        0.03544235 = product of:
          0.0708847 = sum of:
            0.0708847 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0708847 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  3. Krause, J.: Principles of content analysis for information retrieval systems : an overview (1996) 0.02
    0.015287041 = product of:
      0.030574081 = sum of:
        0.030574081 = product of:
          0.061148163 = sum of:
            0.061148163 = weight(_text_:20 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061148163 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.42518654 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.1996 20:12:47
  4. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.01417694 = product of:
      0.02835388 = sum of:
        0.02835388 = product of:
          0.05670776 = sum of:
            0.05670776 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05670776 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  5. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.01
    0.01417694 = product of:
      0.02835388 = sum of:
        0.02835388 = product of:
          0.05670776 = sum of:
            0.05670776 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05670776 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  6. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.01
    0.013265368 = product of:
      0.026530735 = sum of:
        0.026530735 = sum of:
          0.012353795 = weight(_text_:20 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.012353795 = score(doc=1858,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05231876 = queryNorm
              0.08590066 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.01417694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01417694 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05231876 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    4.10.2003 19:20:59
    Footnote
    Bade begins his discussion of errors in subject analysis by summarizing the contents of seven records containing what he considers to be egregious errors. The examples were drawn only from items that he has encountered in the course of his work. Five of the seven records were full-level ("I" level) records for Eastern European materials created between 1996 and 2000 in the OCLC WorldCat database. The final two examples were taken from records created by Bade himself over an unspecified period of time. Although he is to be commended for examining the actual items cataloged and for examining mostly items that he claims to have adequate linguistic and subject expertise to evaluate reliably, Bade's methodology has major flaws. First and foremost, the number of examples provided is completely inadequate to draw any conclusions about the extent of the problem. Although an in-depth qualitative analysis of a small number of records might have yielded some valuable insight into factors that contribute to errors in subject analysis, Bade provides no Information about the circumstances under which the live OCLC records he critiques were created. Instead, he offers simplistic explanations for the errors based solely an his own assumptions. He supplements his analysis of examples with an extremely brief survey of other studies regarding errors in subject analysis, which consists primarily of criticism of work done by Sheila Intner. In the end, it is impossible to draw any reliable conclusions about the nature or extent of errors in subject analysis found in records in shared bibliographic databases based an Bade's analysis. In the final third of the essay, Bade finally reveals his true concern: the deintellectualization of cataloging. It would strengthen the essay tremendously to present this as the primary premise from the very beginning, as this section offers glimpses of a compelling argument. Bade laments, "Many librarians simply do not sec cataloging as an intellectual activity requiring an educated mind" (p. 20). Commenting an recent trends in copy cataloging practice, he declares, "The disaster of our time is that this work is being done more and more by people who can neither evaluate nor correct imported errors and offen are forbidden from even thinking about it" (p. 26). Bade argues that the most valuable content found in catalog records is the intellectual content contributed by knowledgeable catalogers, and he asserts that to perform intellectually demanding tasks such as subject analysis reliably and effectively, catalogers must have the linguistic and subject knowledge required to gain at least a rudimentary understanding of the materials that they describe. He contends that requiring catalogers to quickly dispense with materials in unfamiliar languages and subjects clearly undermines their ability to perform the intellectual work of cataloging and leads to an increasing number of errors in the bibliographic records contributed to shared databases.
  7. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.012530763 = product of:
      0.025061525 = sum of:
        0.025061525 = product of:
          0.05012305 = sum of:
            0.05012305 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05012305 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  8. Naves, M.M.L.: Analise de assunto : concepcoes (1996) 0.01
    0.010919315 = product of:
      0.02183863 = sum of:
        0.02183863 = product of:
          0.04367726 = sum of:
            0.04367726 = weight(_text_:20 in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04367726 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.30370468 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Revista de Biblioteconomia de Brasilia. 20(1996) no.2, S.215-226
  9. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01
    0.010632704 = product of:
      0.021265408 = sum of:
        0.021265408 = product of:
          0.042530816 = sum of:
            0.042530816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042530816 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  10. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.01
    0.010632704 = product of:
      0.021265408 = sum of:
        0.021265408 = product of:
          0.042530816 = sum of:
            0.042530816 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042530816 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18321139 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  11. Nohr, H.: Inhaltsanalyse (1999) 0.01
    0.008735452 = product of:
      0.017470904 = sum of:
        0.017470904 = product of:
          0.034941807 = sum of:
            0.034941807 = weight(_text_:20 in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034941807 = score(doc=3430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 4.1999 20:54:43
  12. Studwell, W.E.: Subject suggestions 6 : some concerns relating to quantity of subjects (1990) 0.01
    0.008735452 = product of:
      0.017470904 = sum of:
        0.017470904 = product of:
          0.034941807 = sum of:
            0.034941807 = weight(_text_:20 in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034941807 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.24296375 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19.12.1995 1:39:20
  13. Winget, M.: Describing art : an alternative approach to subject access and interpretation (2009) 0.01
    0.007721122 = product of:
      0.015442244 = sum of:
        0.015442244 = product of:
          0.030884488 = sum of:
            0.030884488 = weight(_text_:20 in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030884488 = score(doc=3618,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21475165 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 3.1997 20:31:13
    20. 6.2010 14:35:03
  14. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  15. Beghtol, C.: ¬The classification of fiction : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (1994) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.3, S.165-167 (W. Bies); JASIS 46(1995) no.5, S.389-390 (E.G. Bierbaum); Canadian journal of information and library science 20(1995) nos.3/4, S.52-53 (L. Rees-Potter)
  16. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  17. Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
  18. Shatford, S.: Describing a picture : a thousand words are seldom cost effective (1984) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 20:54:21
  19. Mai, J.-E.: Analysis in indexing : document and domain centered approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 20:23:24
  20. Volpers, H.: Inhaltsanalyse (2013) 0.01
    0.0076435204 = product of:
      0.015287041 = sum of:
        0.015287041 = product of:
          0.030574081 = sum of:
            0.030574081 = weight(_text_:20 in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574081 = score(doc=1018,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05231876 = queryNorm
                0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2013 14:20:51