-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.07
0.068089634 = product of:
0.13617927 = sum of:
0.13617927 = sum of:
0.051095292 = weight(_text_:4 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051095292 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.08508398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08508398 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.014180663 = product of:
0.028361326 = sum of:
0.028361326 = product of:
0.056722652 = sum of:
0.056722652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056722652 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Bornmann, L.: What do altmetrics counts mean? : a plea for content analyses (2016)
0.01
0.012773823 = product of:
0.025547646 = sum of:
0.025547646 = product of:
0.051095292 = sum of:
0.051095292 = weight(_text_:4 in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051095292 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.1016-1017
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.010635497 = product of:
0.021270994 = sum of:
0.021270994 = product of:
0.04254199 = sum of:
0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04254199 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.010635497 = product of:
0.021270994 = sum of:
0.021270994 = product of:
0.04254199 = sum of:
0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04254199 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.0088629145 = product of:
0.017725829 = sum of:
0.017725829 = product of:
0.035451658 = sum of:
0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035451658 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.01
0.007451397 = product of:
0.014902794 = sum of:
0.014902794 = product of:
0.029805588 = sum of:
0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029805588 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 8.2007 21:20:02
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Barth, A.; Leydesdorff, L.: Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) (2014)
0.01
0.007451397 = product of:
0.014902794 = sum of:
0.014902794 = product of:
0.029805588 = sum of:
0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 1238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029805588 = score(doc=1238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 1238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.751-764
-
Bornmann, L.; Haunschild, R.: Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) : an empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator (2017)
0.01
0.007451397 = product of:
0.014902794 = sum of:
0.014902794 = product of:
0.029805588 = sum of:
0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 3541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029805588 = score(doc=3541,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 3541, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3541)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.1064-1067
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientists may seek to report a single definable body of research in more than one publication, that is, in repeated reports of the same work or in fractional reports, in order to disseminate their research as widely as possible in the scientific community. Up to now, however, it has not been examined whether this strategy of "multiple publication" in fact leads to greater reception of the research. In the present study, we investigate the influence of number of articles reporting the results of a single study on reception in the scientific community (total citation counts of an article on a single study). Our data set consists of 96 applicants for a research fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (BIF), an international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine. The applicants reported to us all articles that they had published within the framework of their doctoral research projects. On this single project, the applicants had published from 1 to 16 articles (M = 4; Mdn = 3). The results of a regression model with an interaction term show that the practice of multiple publication of research study results does in fact lead to greater reception of the research (higher total citation counts) in the scientific community. However, reception is dependent upon length of article: the longer the article, the more total citation counts increase with the number of articles. Thus, it pays for scientists to practice multiple publication of study results in the form of sizable reports.
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F.de: What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? : Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking (2014)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 1235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=1235,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 1235, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1235)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.732-736
-
Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: BRICS countries and scientific excellence : a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2015)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are notable for their increasing participation in science and technology. The governments of these countries have been boosting their investments in research and development to become part of the group of nations doing research at a world-class level. This study investigates the development of the BRICS countries in the domain of top-cited papers (top 10% and 1% most frequently cited papers) between 1990 and 2010. To assess the extent to which these countries have become important players at the top level, we compare the BRICS countries with the top-performing countries worldwide. As the analyses of the (annual) growth rates show, with the exception of Russia, the BRICS countries have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top-cited countries worldwide. By way of additional analysis, we generate coauthorship networks among authors of highly cited papers for 4 time points to view changes in BRICS participation (1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010). Here, the results show that all BRICS countries succeeded in becoming part of this network, whereby the Chinese collaboration activities focus on the US.
-
Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
-
Bornmann, L.: Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? : an analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores (2017)
0.01
0.0053224266 = product of:
0.010644853 = sum of:
0.010644853 = product of:
0.021289706 = sum of:
0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021289706 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0523325 = queryNorm
0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.1036-1047
