Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Green, R."
  1. Green, R.: Facet detection using WorldCat and WordNet (2014) 0.05 
    0.045891892 = product of:
  0.091783784 = sum of:
    0.091783784 = sum of:
      0.042151466 = weight(_text_:4 in 1419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042151466 = score(doc=1419,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0523325 = queryNorm
          0.29681075 = fieldWeight in 1419, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1419)
      0.04963232 = weight(_text_:22 in 1419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04963232 = score(doc=1419,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0523325 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1419, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1419)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2014 14:11:40
    4. 9.2014 19:49:34
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Green, R.: ISKO and knowledge organization's 25th Anniversary : the future of knowledge organization and ISKO panel discussion (2014) 0.01 
    0.0105378665 = product of:
  0.021075733 = sum of:
    0.021075733 = product of:
      0.042151466 = sum of:
        0.042151466 = weight(_text_:4 in 1394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042151466 = score(doc=1394,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.29681075 = fieldWeight in 1394, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1394)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2014 14:08:16
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 41(2014) no.4, S.327-331
  3. Green, R.: Semantic types, classes, and instantiation (2006) 0.01 
    0.009032457 = product of:
  0.018064914 = sum of:
    0.018064914 = product of:
      0.03612983 = sum of:
        0.03612983 = weight(_text_:4 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03612983 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Semantic types provide a level of abstraction over particulars with shared behavior, such as in the participant structure of semantic frames. The paper presents a preliminary investigation, drawing on data from WordNet and FrameNet, into the relationship between hierarchical level and the semantic types that name frame elements (a.k.a. slots). Patterns discovered include: (1) The level of abstraction of a frame is generally matched by the level of abstraction of its frame elements. (2) The roles played by persons tend to be expressed very specifically. (3) Frame elements that mirror the name of the frame tend to be expressed specifically. (4) Some frame participants tend to be expressed at a constant (general) level of abstraction, regardless of the level of abstraction of the overall frame.
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  4. Green, R.: Indigenous Peoples in the U.S., sovereign nations, and the DDC (2015) 0.01 
    0.009032457 = product of:
  0.018064914 = sum of:
    0.018064914 = product of:
      0.03612983 = sum of:
        0.03612983 = weight(_text_:4 in 2201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03612983 = score(doc=2201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 2201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2015 18:53:29
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.4, S.211-221
  5. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.01 
    0.0088629145 = product of:
  0.017725829 = sum of:
    0.017725829 = product of:
      0.035451658 = sum of:
        0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035451658 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
  6. Green, R.: Syntagmatic relationships in index languages : a reassessment (1995) 0.01 
    0.007451397 = product of:
  0.014902794 = sum of:
    0.014902794 = product of:
      0.029805588 = sum of:
        0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029805588 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library quarterly. 65(1995) no.4, S.365-385
  7. Green, R.: ¬The expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships : a comparative survey (1995) 0.01 
    0.007451397 = product of:
  0.014902794 = sum of:
    0.014902794 = product of:
      0.029805588 = sum of:
        0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 4475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029805588 = score(doc=4475,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 4475, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4475)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 51(1995) no.4, S.315-338
  8. Green, R.: Automated identification of frame semantic relational structures (2000) 0.01 
    0.007451397 = product of:
  0.014902794 = sum of:
    0.014902794 = product of:
      0.029805588 = sum of:
        0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029805588 = score(doc=110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Preliminary attempts to identify semantic frames and their internal structure automatically have met with a degree of success. In a first stage, clustering is used to detect 4 previously identified semantic frames (COMMERCIAL TRANSACTION, HIT, JUDGING, RISK) from verb definitions in Longman's Dictionary of Contemporary English. In a second stage, nouns used in the definitions of frame-invoking verbs or in whose definitions the frame-invoking verbs occur in certain forms are searched in WordNet to identify frame elements. Suggestions for refinement of the processes are discussed
  9. Green, R.: See-also relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification (2011) 0.01 
    0.007451397 = product of:
  0.014902794 = sum of:
    0.014902794 = product of:
      0.029805588 = sum of:
        0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 4615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029805588 = score(doc=4615,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 4615, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4615)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 38(2011) no.4, S.335-341
  10. Green, R.: ¬The design of a relational database for large-scale bibliographic retrieval (1996) 0.01 
    0.0063869115 = product of:
  0.012773823 = sum of:
    0.012773823 = product of:
      0.025547646 = sum of:
        0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 7712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025547646 = score(doc=7712,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 7712, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7712)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 15(1996) no.4, S.207-221
  11. Green, R.: ¬The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities (1997) 0.01 
    0.0063869115 = product of:
  0.012773823 = sum of:
    0.012773823 = product of:
      0.025547646 = sum of:
        0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025547646 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper is divided into 3 parts. The 1st develops a framework for evaluating the indexing needs of the humanities with reference to 4 sets of contrasts: user (need)-oriented vs. document-oriented indexing; subject indexing vs. attribute indexing; scientific writing vs. humanistic writing; and topical relevance vs. logical relevance vs. evidential relevance vs. aesthetic relevance. The indexing needs for the humanities range broadly across these contrasts. The 2nd part establishes the centrality of relationships to the communication of indexable matter and examines the advantages and disadvantages of means used for their expression inboth natural languages and indexing languages. The use of relational structure, such as a frame, is shown to represent perhaps the best available option. The 3rd part illustrates where the use of relational structures in humanities indexing would help meet some of the needs previously identified. Although not a panacea, the adoption of frame-based indexing in the humanities might substantially improve the retrieval of its literature
  12. Green, R.: ¬The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities (1997) 0.01 
    0.0063869115 = product of:
  0.012773823 = sum of:
    0.012773823 = product of:
      0.025547646 = sum of:
        0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025547646 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Develops a framework for evaluating the indexing needs of the humanities with reference to 4 set of contrasts: user-oriented vs. document oriented indexing; subject indexing vs. attribute indexing; scientific writing vs. humanistic writing; and topical relevance vs. logical relevance vs. evidential relevance vs. aesthetic relevance. The indexing needs of the humanities range broadly across these contrasts. Established the centrality of relationship to the communication of indexable matter and examines the advantages and disadvantages of means used for their expression in both natural languages and index languages. The use of a relational structure, such as a frame, is shown to represent perhaps the best available option. Illustrates where the use of relational structures in humanities indexing would help meet some of the needs previously identified. The adoption of frame-based indexing in the humanities might substantially improve the retrieval of its literature

Years

Themes