Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Toms, E.G."
  1. Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis : an integrated information behavior and task analysis approach (2005) 0.01
    0.0088629145 = product of:
      0.017725829 = sum of:
        0.017725829 = product of:
          0.035451658 = sum of:
            0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 5256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035451658 = score(doc=5256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:28:55
  2. O'Brien, H.L.; Toms, E.G.: What is user engagement? : a conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology (2008) 0.01
    0.0088629145 = product of:
      0.017725829 = sum of:
        0.017725829 = product of:
          0.035451658 = sum of:
            0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 1721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035451658 = score(doc=1721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2008 13:39:22
  3. Dufour, C.; Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Understanding how webcasts are used as sources of information (2011) 0.01
    0.0088629145 = product of:
      0.017725829 = sum of:
        0.017725829 = product of:
          0.035451658 = sum of:
            0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035451658 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:16:14
  4. Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014) 0.01
    0.0088629145 = product of:
      0.017725829 = sum of:
        0.017725829 = product of:
          0.035451658 = sum of:
            0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035451658 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:31:22
  5. Toms, E.G.: What motivates the browser? (1999) 0.01
    0.0070903315 = product of:
      0.014180663 = sum of:
        0.014180663 = product of:
          0.028361326 = sum of:
            0.028361326 = weight(_text_:22 in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028361326 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:44:47
  6. Toms, E.G.; Freund, L.; Li, C.: WilRE: the Web Interactive information retrieval experimentation system prototype (2004) 0.01
    0.0063869115 = product of:
      0.012773823 = sum of:
        0.012773823 = product of:
          0.025547646 = sum of:
            0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025547646 = score(doc=2534,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2534, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.655-676
  7. Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Interacting with archival finding aids (2016) 0.01
    0.0063869115 = product of:
      0.012773823 = sum of:
        0.012773823 = product of:
          0.025547646 = sum of:
            0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025547646 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.994-1008
  8. McCay-Peet, L.; Toms, E.G.: Investigating serendipity : how it unfolds and what may influence it (2015) 0.01
    0.0053224266 = product of:
      0.010644853 = sum of:
        0.010644853 = product of:
          0.021289706 = sum of:
            0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 2044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021289706 = score(doc=2044,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 2044, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2044)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Serendipity is not an easy word to define. Its meaning has been stretched to apply to experiences ranging from the mundane to the exceptional. Serendipity, however, is consistently associated with unexpected and positive personal, scholarly, scientific, organizational, and societal events and discoveries. Diverse serendipitous experiences share a conceptual space; therefore, what lessons can we draw from an exploration of how serendipity unfolds and what may influence it? This article describes an investigation of work-related serendipity. Twelve professionals and academics from a variety of fields were interviewed. The core of the semi-structured interviews focused on participants' own work-related experiences that could be recalled and discussed in depth. This research validated and augmented prior research while consolidating previous models of serendipity into a single model of the process of serendipity, consisting of: Trigger, Connection, Follow-up, and Valuable Outcome, and an Unexpected Thread that runs through 1 or more of the first 4 elements. Together, the elements influence the Perception of Serendipity. Furthermore, this research identified what factors relating to the individual and their environment may facilitate the main elements of serendipity and further influence its perception.