Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"fi"
  1. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.02 
    0.021270994 = product of:
  0.04254199 = sum of:
    0.04254199 = product of:
      0.08508398 = sum of:
        0.08508398 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08508398 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
  2. Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996) 0.01 
    0.009032457 = product of:
  0.018064914 = sum of:
    0.018064914 = product of:
      0.03612983 = sum of:
        0.03612983 = weight(_text_:4 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03612983 = score(doc=27,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system
    Source
    Informaatiotutkimus. 15(1996) no.4, S.133-144
  3. Kuronen, T.: Ranganathanin lait ja virtuaalikirjasto (1996) 0.01 
    0.008515882 = product of:
  0.017031765 = sum of:
    0.017031765 = product of:
      0.03406353 = sum of:
        0.03406353 = weight(_text_:4 in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03406353 = score(doc=6704,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    Finnish information studies; 4
  4. Savolainen, R.: Tiedon kayton tutkimus informaatiotutkimuksessa (1994) 0.01 
    0.007451397 = product of:
  0.014902794 = sum of:
    0.014902794 = product of:
      0.029805588 = sum of:
        0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029805588 = score(doc=3670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0523325 = queryNorm
            0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Kirjastotiede ja informatiika. 13(1994) no.4, S.101-109

Authors

Types

Themes