Search (303 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.07
    0.068089634 = product of:
      0.13617927 = sum of:
        0.13617927 = sum of:
          0.051095292 = weight(_text_:4 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051095292 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.35978895 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.08508398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08508398 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.866-867
  2. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.05
    0.04539309 = product of:
      0.09078618 = sum of:
        0.09078618 = sum of:
          0.03406353 = weight(_text_:4 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03406353 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.056722652 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056722652 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 9.2014 14:11:40
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
  3. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.04
    0.042855553 = product of:
      0.08571111 = sum of:
        0.08571111 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.06016346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06016346 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
  4. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.04
    0.040122204 = product of:
      0.08024441 = sum of:
        0.08024441 = sum of:
          0.030108191 = weight(_text_:4 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030108191 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.21200769 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.050136212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050136212 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.4, S.241-254
  5. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.04
    0.039718952 = product of:
      0.079437904 = sum of:
        0.079437904 = sum of:
          0.029805588 = weight(_text_:4 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029805588 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
          0.04963232 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04963232 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
    Source
    Probleme de Informare si Documentare. 31(1997) nos.3/4, S.207-220
  6. Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008) 0.04
    0.039335907 = product of:
      0.07867181 = sum of:
        0.07867181 = sum of:
          0.03612983 = weight(_text_:4 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03612983 = score(doc=2758,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:03:12
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.565-576
  7. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.039335907 = product of:
      0.07867181 = sum of:
        0.07867181 = sum of:
          0.03612983 = weight(_text_:4 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03612983 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.25440922 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  8. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.03
    0.034044817 = product of:
      0.068089634 = sum of:
        0.068089634 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  9. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.03
    0.034044817 = product of:
      0.068089634 = sum of:
        0.068089634 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.754-777
  10. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.03
    0.034044817 = product of:
      0.068089634 = sum of:
        0.068089634 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.778-788
  11. Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016) 0.03
    0.034044817 = product of:
      0.068089634 = sum of:
        0.068089634 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) uses six university performance indicators, including "Alumni" and "Awards"-the number of alumni and staff winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals. These two indicators raised doubts about the reliability of this ranking method because they are difficult to cope with. Recently, a newsletter was published featuring a reduced ARWU ranking list, leaving out Nobel Prize and Fields Medal indicators: the Alternative Ranking (Excluding Award Factor). We used uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to examine and compare the stability and confidence of the official ARWU ranking and the Alternative Ranking. The results indicate that if the ARWU ranking is reduced to the 4-indicator Alternative Ranking, it shows greater certainty and stability in ranking universities.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:40:53
  12. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016) 0.03
    0.034044817 = product of:
      0.068089634 = sum of:
        0.068089634 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2016 12:22:00
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.960-966
  13. Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023) 0.03
    0.034044817 = product of:
      0.068089634 = sum of:
        0.068089634 = sum of:
          0.025547646 = weight(_text_:4 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025547646 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.17989448 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
          0.04254199 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04254199 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.415-433
  14. Costas, R.; Bordons, M.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers (2009) 0.03
    0.032779925 = product of:
      0.06555985 = sum of:
        0.06555985 = sum of:
          0.030108191 = weight(_text_:4 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030108191 = score(doc=2759,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.21200769 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035451658 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:02:48
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system: influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.565-576.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753
  15. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.03
    0.028370682 = product of:
      0.056741364 = sum of:
        0.056741364 = sum of:
          0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021289706 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035451658 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.805-816
  16. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03
    0.028370682 = product of:
      0.056741364 = sum of:
        0.056741364 = sum of:
          0.021289706 = weight(_text_:4 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021289706 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.035451658 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035451658 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0523325 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.402-414
  17. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03
    0.028361326 = product of:
      0.056722652 = sum of:
        0.056722652 = product of:
          0.113445304 = sum of:
            0.113445304 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113445304 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  18. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.028361326 = product of:
      0.056722652 = sum of:
        0.056722652 = product of:
          0.113445304 = sum of:
            0.113445304 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113445304 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  19. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03
    0.028361326 = product of:
      0.056722652 = sum of:
        0.056722652 = product of:
          0.113445304 = sum of:
            0.113445304 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113445304 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  20. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.03
    0.025068106 = product of:
      0.050136212 = sum of:
        0.050136212 = product of:
          0.100272425 = sum of:
            0.100272425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.100272425 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 291
  • m 7
  • el 6
  • s 5
  • x 2
  • More… Less…