-
Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997)
0.02
0.017259631 = product of:
0.034519263 = sum of:
0.034519263 = product of:
0.069038525 = sum of:
0.069038525 = weight(_text_:56 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069038525 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 8.1998 19:56:47
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.013991804 = product of:
0.027983608 = sum of:
0.027983608 = product of:
0.055967215 = sum of:
0.055967215 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055967215 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.0122428285 = product of:
0.024485657 = sum of:
0.024485657 = product of:
0.048971314 = sum of:
0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048971314 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26