-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.04
0.04214637 = product of:
0.08429274 = sum of:
0.08429274 = sum of:
0.049313232 = weight(_text_:56 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049313232 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03497951 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of 2 studies to determine if structured abstracts offer any advantage to users in terms of whether they are easier to search. In study 1, using a specially prepared electronic database of abstracts in either their original format or the structured format, 52 users were asked to find the answers to 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts in traditional format followed by 2 questions for each of 8 abstracts set in the structured format. Time and error data were recorded automatically. In study 2, using a printed database, 56 users were asked to to find 5 abstracts that reprted a particular kind of study and then find 5 more references that reported another kind of study. In study 1 users performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts but there were some unexplainable practice effects. In study 2, the users again performed significantly faster and made fewer errors with structured abstracts. However, there were asymmetrical transfer effects: users who responded first to the structured abstracts responded more quickly to the following traditional abstracts than did those users who responded first to the traditional abstracts. Nevertheless, the overall findings support the hypothesis that it is easier for user to search structured abstracts than it is to search traditional abstracts
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992)
0.02
0.019725293 = product of:
0.039450586 = sum of:
0.039450586 = product of:
0.07890117 = sum of:
0.07890117 = weight(_text_:56 in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07890117 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.017489756 = product of:
0.03497951 = sum of:
0.03497951 = product of:
0.06995902 = sum of:
0.06995902 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06995902 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.013991804 = product of:
0.027983608 = sum of:
0.027983608 = product of:
0.055967215 = sum of:
0.055967215 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055967215 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.010493852 = product of:
0.020987704 = sum of:
0.020987704 = product of:
0.04197541 = sum of:
0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04197541 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.01
0.010493852 = product of:
0.020987704 = sum of:
0.020987704 = product of:
0.04197541 = sum of:
0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04197541 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.01
0.010493852 = product of:
0.020987704 = sum of:
0.020987704 = product of:
0.04197541 = sum of:
0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04197541 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051635534 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
