Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Taglinger, H.: Ausgevogelt, jetzt wird es ernst (2018) 0.04 
    0.04214637 = product of:
  0.08429274 = sum of:
    0.08429274 = sum of:
      0.049313232 = weight(_text_:56 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049313232 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051635534 = queryNorm
          0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
      0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03497951 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051635534 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    21. 1.2018 19:12:56
    22. 1.2018 11:38:55
  2. Gerhardt, V.: Methodischer Optimismus vor digitaler Zukunft (2016) 0.03 
    0.02958794 = product of:
  0.05917588 = sum of:
    0.05917588 = product of:
      0.11835176 = sum of:
        0.11835176 = weight(_text_:56 in 3255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11835176 = score(doc=3255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.5512596 = fieldWeight in 3255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    24.11.2016 10:35:56
  3. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02 
    0.024734247 = product of:
  0.049468495 = sum of:
    0.049468495 = product of:
      0.09893699 = sum of:
        0.09893699 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09893699 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  4. Loos, A.: ¬Die Million ist geknackt (2015) 0.02 
    0.020987704 = product of:
  0.04197541 = sum of:
    0.04197541 = product of:
      0.08395082 = sum of:
        0.08395082 = weight(_text_:22 in 4208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08395082 = score(doc=4208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4208)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 4.2015 17:22:03
  5. Bläsi, C.: Literary studies, business studies - and information science? : Yes, it's a key discipline for the empowerment of publishing studies for the digital age (2015) 0.02 
    0.019725293 = product of:
  0.039450586 = sum of:
    0.039450586 = product of:
      0.07890117 = sum of:
        0.07890117 = weight(_text_:56 in 2986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07890117 = score(doc=2986,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 2986, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 6.2016 19:56:32
  6. Oßwald, A.: Significant properties digitaler Objekte : Ergebnisse aus Fallstudien (2010) 0.02 
    0.017259631 = product of:
  0.034519263 = sum of:
    0.034519263 = product of:
      0.069038525 = sum of:
        0.069038525 = weight(_text_:56 in 4675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069038525 = score(doc=4675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 4675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4675)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 8.2011 14:53:56
  7. Weishaupt, K.: Open-Access-Zeitschriften als Schuttabladeplatz für minderwertige Beiträge? (2013) 0.02 
    0.017259631 = product of:
  0.034519263 = sum of:
    0.034519263 = product of:
      0.069038525 = sum of:
        0.069038525 = weight(_text_:56 in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069038525 = score(doc=792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    21. 6.2013 17:56:03
  8. Herb, U.: Open Science in der Soziologie : eine interdisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme zur offenen Wissenschaft und eine Untersuchung ihrer Verbreitung in der Soziologie (2015) 0.02 
    0.017259631 = product of:
  0.034519263 = sum of:
    0.034519263 = product of:
      0.069038525 = sum of:
        0.069038525 = weight(_text_:56 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069038525 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 6.2016 19:56:32
  9. Ginther, C.; Lackner, K.: Predatory Publishing : Herausforderung für Wissenschaftler/innen und Bibliotheken (2019) 0.01 
    0.01479397 = product of:
  0.02958794 = sum of:
    0.02958794 = product of:
      0.05917588 = sum of:
        0.05917588 = weight(_text_:56 in 5330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05917588 = score(doc=5330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 5330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.10.2019 13:56:05
  10. Schleim, S.: Warum die Wissenschaft nicht frei ist (2017) 0.01 
    0.013991804 = product of:
  0.027983608 = sum of:
    0.027983608 = product of:
      0.055967215 = sum of:
        0.055967215 = weight(_text_:22 in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055967215 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9.10.2017 15:48:22
  11. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016) 0.01 
    0.012328308 = product of:
  0.024656616 = sum of:
    0.024656616 = product of:
      0.049313232 = sum of:
        0.049313232 = weight(_text_:56 in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049313232 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scholars writing books that are widely used to support teaching in higher education may be undervalued because of a lack of evidence of teaching value. Although sales data may give credible evidence for textbooks, these data may poorly reflect educational uses of other types of books. As an alternative, this article proposes a method to search automatically for mentions of books in online academic course syllabi based on Bing searches for syllabi mentioning a given book, filtering out false matches through an extensive set of rules. The method had an accuracy of over 90% based on manual checks of a sample of 2,600 results from the initial Bing searches. Over one third of about 14,000 monographs checked had one or more academic syllabus mention, with more in the arts and humanities (56%) and social sciences (52%). Low but significant correlations between syllabus mentions and citations across most fields, except the social sciences, suggest that books tend to have different levels of impact for teaching and research. In conclusion, the automatic syllabus search method gives a new way to estimate the educational utility of books in a way that sales data and citation counts cannot.
  12. Müller, S.: Schattenbibliotheken : Welche Auswirkungen haben Sci-Hub und Co. auf Verlage und Bibliotheken? (2019) 0.01 
    0.0122428285 = product of:
  0.024485657 = sum of:
    0.024485657 = product of:
      0.048971314 = sum of:
        0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048971314 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.5, S.397-404
  13. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.01 
    0.0122428285 = product of:
  0.024485657 = sum of:
    0.024485657 = product of:
      0.048971314 = sum of:
        0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048971314 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  14. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.01 
    0.0122428285 = product of:
  0.024485657 = sum of:
    0.024485657 = product of:
      0.048971314 = sum of:
        0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048971314 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
  15. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.01 
    0.0122428285 = product of:
  0.024485657 = sum of:
    0.024485657 = product of:
      0.048971314 = sum of:
        0.048971314 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048971314 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
  16. Münch, V.: They have a dream (2019) 0.01 
    0.010493852 = product of:
  0.020987704 = sum of:
    0.020987704 = product of:
      0.04197541 = sum of:
        0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04197541 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.1, S.25-39
  17. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.01 
    0.010493852 = product of:
  0.020987704 = sum of:
    0.020987704 = product of:
      0.04197541 = sum of:
        0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04197541 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  18. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.01 
    0.008744878 = product of:
  0.017489756 = sum of:
    0.017489756 = product of:
      0.03497951 = sum of:
        0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03497951 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  19. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01 
    0.008744878 = product of:
  0.017489756 = sum of:
    0.017489756 = product of:
      0.03497951 = sum of:
        0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03497951 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016) 0.01 
    0.008744878 = product of:
  0.017489756 = sum of:
    0.017489756 = product of:
      0.03497951 = sum of:
        0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03497951 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051635534 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:11:17

Authors

Languages

  • d 14
  • e 10

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications