-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.01744775 = product of:
0.052343246 = sum of:
0.052343246 = product of:
0.10468649 = sum of:
0.10468649 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10468649 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.01744775 = product of:
0.052343246 = sum of:
0.052343246 = product of:
0.10468649 = sum of:
0.10468649 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10468649 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.015421777 = product of:
0.04626533 = sum of:
0.04626533 = product of:
0.09253066 = sum of:
0.09253066 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09253066 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Klein, A.: Von der Schneeflocke zur Lawine : Möglichkeiten der Nutzung freier Zitationsdaten in Bibliotheken (2017)
0.02
0.015308681 = product of:
0.045926042 = sum of:
0.045926042 = product of:
0.091852084 = sum of:
0.091852084 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091852084 = score(doc=4002,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Zitationen spielen eine wichtige Rolle im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs, in der Recherchepraxis sowie im Bereich der Bibliometrie. In jüngster Zeit gibt es zunehmend Initiativen, die Zitationen als Open Data zur freien Nachnutzung verfügbar machen. Der Beitrag beschreibt den Stand der Entwicklung dieser Initiativen und zeigt, dass in nächster Zeit eine kritische Masse von Daten entstehen könnte, aus denen sich gerade für Bibliotheken neue Perspektiven ergeben. Als konkrete Möglichkeit zur Partizipation für Bibliotheken wird das DFG-Projekt Linked Open Citation Database (LOC-DB) vorgestellt.
-
Stock, W.G.: Journal Citation Reports : Ein Impact Factor für Bibliotheken, Verlage und Autoren? (2001)
0.01
0.010934772 = product of:
0.032804314 = sum of:
0.032804314 = product of:
0.06560863 = sum of:
0.06560863 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06560863 = score(doc=5915,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.36054584 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Gibt es objektive Kriterien für die Bestellung und Abbestellung wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften? Wie lange sollte eine Bibliothek Periodikabestände benutzernah aufstellen? Kann ein Verlag -außer via Verkaufszahlen - auf Kriterien des Erfolgs seiner Zeitschriften zurückgreifen? Hat ein Autor eine Entscheidungsgrundlage, welcher Zeitschrift er seinen Artikel anbietet? Ist die Forschungsaktivität eines Instituts oder eines Wissenschaftlers über den Impact derjenigen Zeitschriftentitel zu evaluieren, die die Forschungsergebnisse drucken? Können die 'Journal Citation Reports (JCR) "des "Institute for Scientific Information" bei der Klärung solcher Fragen helfen? Sind die JCR ein nützliches oder gar ein notwendiges Hilfsmittel für Bibliotheken, für Verlage, für Wissenschaftsmanager und für wissenschaftliche Autoren? Die 'Journal Citation Reports" geben im Jahresrhythmus informetrische Kennzahlen wie die Zitationsrate, den Impact Factor, den Immediacy Index, die Halbwertszeit für eine Auswahl wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften an. Zusätzlich berichten sie darüber, weiche Zeitschriften weiche anderen Zeitschriften zitieren bzw. von diesen zitiert werden, so dass "Soziogramme" wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenkommunikation entstehen. Wir wollen am Beispiel des aktuellen Jahrgangs ( 1999) die JCR detailliert beschreiben, die Auswahlkriterien der Zeitschriften beleuchten, die verwendeten informetrischen Kennwerte - vor allem den Impact Factor - kritisch hinterfragen, um danach die Einsatzgebiete bei Bibliotheken, in der Wissenschaftsevaluation, bei Verlagen und bei Autoren zu diskutieren. Das Fazit sei vorweggenommen: Die JCR sind ein nicht umgehbares Hilfsmittel für die fokussierten Anwendungsbereiche. Sie sind mitnichten frei von Problemen. Wir schließen daher mit einigen Verbesserungsvorschlägen
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.010904844 = product of:
0.03271453 = sum of:
0.03271453 = product of:
0.06542906 = sum of:
0.06542906 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06542906 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.009253067 = product of:
0.0277592 = sum of:
0.0277592 = product of:
0.0555184 = sum of:
0.0555184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0555184 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.008723875 = product of:
0.026171623 = sum of:
0.026171623 = product of:
0.052343246 = sum of:
0.052343246 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052343246 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.00763339 = product of:
0.02290017 = sum of:
0.02290017 = product of:
0.04580034 = sum of:
0.04580034 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04580034 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.00763339 = product of:
0.02290017 = sum of:
0.02290017 = product of:
0.04580034 = sum of:
0.04580034 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04580034 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.00763339 = product of:
0.02290017 = sum of:
0.02290017 = product of:
0.04580034 = sum of:
0.04580034 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04580034 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999)
0.01
0.007575832 = product of:
0.022727495 = sum of:
0.022727495 = product of:
0.04545499 = sum of:
0.04545499 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04545499 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Das ISI in Philadelphia bündelt seine großen Zitationsdatenbanken und bietet sie (vorzugsweise als Intranet-, aber auch als Internetlösung) als 'Web of Science'an. Im derzeitigen entwicklungsstand geht 'Web of Science' bis in die 70er Jahre zurück und weist damit knapp 20 Mill. Quellenartikel mit darin enthaltenen rund 300 Mill. Zitationen in einer einzigen datenbank nach. Neben 'gewohnten' Suchstrategien etwa nach Sachthemen oder Namen werden zitationsanalytische Suchstrategien geboten: Recherchen nach zitierter Literatur, nach zitierenden Artikeln und nach (im Sinne gemeinsamer Fußnoten) 'verwandten' Artikeln. Die Ausgabefunktionen umfassen Document Delivery via ISI sowie Links zu Artikeln, die parallel zur Druckausgabe im WWW erscheinen. Durch die Multidisziplinarität der ISI-Datenbanken sind als Kundenkreis vor allem Einrichtungen angesprochen, die mehrere Wissenschaftsfächer berühren. Hochschulbibliotheken oder Bibliotheken großer Forschungseinrichtungen dürften am 'Web of Science' kaum vorbeikommen. Parallele Produkte bei Online-Archiven, auf CD-ROM oder als Druckausgabe verlieren an Bedeutung
-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.01
0.007575832 = product of:
0.022727495 = sum of:
0.022727495 = product of:
0.04545499 = sum of:
0.04545499 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04545499 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18197028 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.0065429057 = product of:
0.019628717 = sum of:
0.019628717 = product of:
0.039257433 = sum of:
0.039257433 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039257433 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16911052 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04829205 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
