Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.099312276 = product of:
  0.19862455 = sum of:
    0.19862455 = product of:
      0.3972491 = sum of:
        0.3972491 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3972491 = score(doc=3667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            1.3131902 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Theme

Automatisches Abstracting

0.06950412 = product of:
  0.13900824 = sum of:
    0.13900824 = product of:
      0.27801648 = sum of:
        0.27801648 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27801648 = score(doc=6506,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.91904175 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the abstracting assistance features being prototyped in the TEXNET text network management system. Sentence weighting methods include: weithing negatively or positively on the stems in a selected passage; weighting on general lists of cue words, adjusting weights of selected segments; and weighting of occurrence of frequent stems. The user may adjust a number of parameters: the minimum strength of extracts; the threshold for frequent word/stems and the amount sentence weight is to be adjusted for each weighting type

Theme

Automatisches Abstracting

0.060192328 = product of:
  0.120384656 = sum of:
    0.120384656 = product of:
      0.24076931 = sum of:
        0.24076931 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 7426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24076931 = score(doc=7426,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.79591346 = fieldWeight in 7426, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7426)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Experimental subjects wrote abstracts of an article using a simplified version of the TEXNET abstracting assistance software. In addition to the fulltext, the 35 subjects were presented with either keywords or phrases extracted automatically. The resulting abstracts, and the times taken, were recorded automatically; some additional information was gathered by oral questionnaire. Results showed considerable variation among subjects, but 37% found the keywords or phrases quite or very useful in writing their abstracts. Statistical analysis failed to support deveral hypothesised relations; phrases were not viewed as significantly more helpful than keywords; and abstracting experience did not correlate with originality of wording, approximation of the author abstract, or greater conciseness. Results also suggested possible modifications to the software

Theme

Automatisches Abstracting

0.05674987 = product of:
  0.11349974 = sum of:
    0.11349974 = product of:
      0.22699948 = sum of:
        0.22699948 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 7949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22699948 = score(doc=7949,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.7503944 = fieldWeight in 7949, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A multi-purpose thesaurus is among abstracting assistance features being prototyped in the TEXNET text networking management system. The thesaurus is intended to support vocabulary control, including production of a variety of printed thesaurus displays, as well as automatic weighting of passages and Roget-style suggestions of alternate terms

0.05674987 = product of:
  0.11349974 = sum of:
    0.11349974 = product of:
      0.22699948 = sum of:
        0.22699948 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22699948 = score(doc=4897,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.7503944 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes computerized tools for computer assisted abstracting. FlipPhr is a Microsoft Windows application program that rearranges (flips) phrases or other expressions in accordance with rules in a grammar. The flipping may be invoked with a single keystroke from within various Windows application programs that allow cutting and pasting of text. The user may modify the grammar to provide for different kinds of flipping

Theme

Automatisches Abstracting

0.05212809 = product of:
  0.10425618 = sum of:
    0.10425618 = product of:
      0.20851237 = sum of:
        0.20851237 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20851237 = score(doc=4809,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.68928134 = fieldWeight in 4809, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4809)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Experimental subjects wrote abstracts using a simplified version of the TEXNET abstracting assistance software. In addition to the full text, subjects were presented with either keywords or phrases extracted automatically. The resulting abstracts, and the times taken, were recorded automatically; some additional information was gathered by oral questionnaire. Selected abstracts produced were evaluated on various criteria by independent raters. Results showed considerable variation among subjects, but 37% found the keywords or phrases 'quite' or 'very' useful in writing their abstracts. Statistical analysis failed to support several hypothesized relations: phrases were not viewed as significantly more helpful than keywords; and abstracting experience did not correlate with originality of wording, approximation of the author abstract, or greater conciseness. Requiring further study are some unanticipated strong correlations including the following: Windows experience and writing an abstract like the author's; experience reading abstracts and thinking one had written a good abstract; gender and abstract length; gender and use of words and phrases from the original text. Results have also suggested possible modifications to the TEXNET software

Theme

Automatisches Abstracting