Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Moens, M.-F."
  1. Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.: Automatic text structuring and categorization as a first step in summarizing legal cases (1997) 0.06 
    0.060192328 = product of:
  0.120384656 = sum of:
    0.120384656 = product of:
      0.24076931 = sum of:
        0.24076931 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24076931 = score(doc=2256,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.79591346 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The SALOMON system automatically summarizes Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future court decisions. SALOMON extracts relevant text units from the case text to form a case summary. Such a case profile facilitates the rapid determination of the relevance of the case or may be employed in text search. In a first important abstracting step SALOMON performs an initial categorization of legal criminal cases and structures the case text into separate legally relevant and irrelevant components. A text grammar represented as a semantic network is used to automatically determine the category of the case and its components. Extracts from the case general data and identifies text portions relevant for further abstracting. Prior knowledge of the text structure and its indicative cues may support automatic abstracting. A text grammar is a promising form for representing the knowledge involved
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  2. Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999) 0.05 
    0.05212809 = product of:
  0.10425618 = sum of:
    0.10425618 = product of:
      0.20851237 = sum of:
        0.20851237 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20851237 = score(doc=2944,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.68928134 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The SALOMON project automatically summarizes Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future court decisions. SALOMON extracts text units from the case text to form a case summary. Such a case summary facilitates the rapid determination of the relevance of the case or may be employed in text search. an important part of the research concerns the development of techniques for automatic recognition of representative text paragraphs (or sentences) in texts of unrestricted domains. these techniques are employed to eliminate redundant material in the case texts, and to identify informative text paragraphs which are relevant to include in the case summary. An evaluation of a test set of 700 criminal cases demonstrates that the algorithms have an application potential for automatic indexing, abstracting, and text linkage
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  3. Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998) 0.05 
    0.049656138 = product of:
  0.099312276 = sum of:
    0.099312276 = product of:
      0.19862455 = sum of:
        0.19862455 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19862455 = score(doc=495,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.6565951 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  4. Moens, M.-F.: Summarizing court decisions (2007) 0.04 
    0.03511219 = product of:
  0.07022438 = sum of:
    0.07022438 = product of:
      0.14044876 = sum of:
        0.14044876 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14044876 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050391316 = queryNorm
            0.46428284 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting

Authors

Years