Search (681 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08
    0.08003477 = product of:
      0.16006954 = sum of:
        0.16006954 = product of:
          0.4802086 = sum of:
            0.4802086 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4802086 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Koltay, T.: Abstracts and abstracting : a genre and set of skills for the twenty-first century (2010) 0.07
    0.070937335 = product of:
      0.14187467 = sum of:
        0.14187467 = product of:
          0.28374934 = sum of:
            0.28374934 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 4125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28374934 = score(doc=4125,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.937993 = fieldWeight in 4125, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Despite their changing role, abstracts remain useful in the digital world. Aimed at both information professionals and researchers who work and publish in different fields, this book summarizes the most important and up-to-date theory of abstracting, as well as giving advice and examples for the practice of writing different kinds of abstracts. The book discusses the length, the functions and basic structure of abstracts. A new approach is outlined on the questions of informative and indicative abstracts. The abstractors' personality, their linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge and skills are also discussed with special attention. The process of abstracting, its steps and models, as well as recipient's role are treated with special distinction. Abstracting is presented as an aimed (purported) understanding of the original text, its interpretation and then a special projection of the information deemed to be worth of abstracting into a new text.Despite the relatively large number of textbooks on the topic there is no up-to-date book on abstracting in the English language. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of the topic, the proposed book contains novel views - especially on informative and indicative abstracts. The discussion is based on an interdisciplinary approach, blending the methods of library and information science and linguistics. The book strives to a synthesis of theory and practice. The synthesis is based on a large and existing body of knowledge which, however, is often characterised by misleading terminology and flawed beliefs.
    LCSH
    Abstracting
    Subject
    Abstracting
  3. Hahn, U.: Automatisches Abstracting (2013) 0.07
    0.070937335 = product of:
      0.14187467 = sum of:
        0.14187467 = product of:
          0.28374934 = sum of:
            0.28374934 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28374934 = score(doc=721,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.937993 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  4. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.07
    0.067228585 = product of:
      0.13445717 = sum of:
        0.13445717 = sum of:
          0.10032054 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10032054 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050391316 = queryNorm
              0.3316306 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.034136638 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034136638 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1764618 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050391316 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  5. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07
    0.066695645 = product of:
      0.13339129 = sum of:
        0.13339129 = product of:
          0.40017384 = sum of:
            0.40017384 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.40017384 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  6. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.07
    0.0663558 = product of:
      0.1327116 = sum of:
        0.1327116 = product of:
          0.2654232 = sum of:
            0.2654232 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2654232 = score(doc=3959,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.8774121 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to systemize and improve the scientific status of studies on document abstracting. This is a diachronic, systematic study of document abstracting studies carried out from different perspectives and models (textual, psycholinguistic, social and communicative). Design/methodology/approach - A review of the perspectives and analysis proposals which are of interest to the various theoreticians of abstracting is carried out using a variety of techniques and approaches (cognitive, linguistic, communicative-social, didactic, etc.), each with different levels of theoretical and methodological abstraction and degrees of application. The most significant contributions of each are reviewed and highlighted, along with their limitations. Findings - It is found that the great challenge in abstracting is the systemization of models and conceptual apparatus, which open up this type of research to semiotic and socio-interactional perspectives. It is necessary to carry out suitable empirical research with operative designs and ad hoc measuring instruments which can measure the efficiency of the abstracting and the efficiency of a good abstract, while at the same time feeding back into the theoretical baggage of this type of study. Such research will have to explain and provide answers to all the elements and variables, which affect the realization and the reception of a quality abstract. Originality/value - The paper provides a small map of the studies on document abstracting. This shows how the conceptual and methodological framework has extended at the same time as the Science of Documentation has been evolving. All the models analysed - the communicative and interactional approach - are integrated in a new systematic framework.
  7. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05
    0.046686955 = product of:
      0.09337391 = sum of:
        0.09337391 = product of:
          0.2801217 = sum of:
            0.2801217 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2801217 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  8. Zhao, S.X.; Zhang, P.L.; Li, J.; Tan, A.M.; Ye, F.Y.: Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths (2014) 0.04
    0.042562403 = product of:
      0.085124806 = sum of:
        0.085124806 = product of:
          0.17024961 = sum of:
            0.17024961 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17024961 = score(doc=1256,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.5627958 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Most measures of networks are based on the nodes, although links are also elementary units in networks and represent interesting social or physical connections. In this work we suggest an option for exploring networks, called the h-strength, with explicit focus on links and their strengths. The h-strength and its extensions can naturally simplify a complex network to a small and concise subnetwork (h-subnet) but retains the most important links with its core structure. Its applications in 2 typical information networks, the paper cocitation network of a topic (the h-index) and 5 scientific collaboration networks in the field of "water resources," suggest that h-strength and its extensions could be a useful choice for abstracting, simplifying, and visualizing a complex network. Moreover, we observe that the 2 informetric models, the Glänzel-Schubert model and the Hirsch model, roughly hold in the context of the h-strength for the collaboration networks.
  9. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04
    0.040017385 = product of:
      0.08003477 = sum of:
        0.08003477 = product of:
          0.2401043 = sum of:
            0.2401043 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2401043 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  10. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.04
    0.040017385 = product of:
      0.08003477 = sum of:
        0.08003477 = product of:
          0.2401043 = sum of:
            0.2401043 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2401043 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  11. Atanassova, I.; Bertin, M.; Larivière, V.: On the composition of scientific abstracts (2016) 0.04
    0.035468668 = product of:
      0.070937335 = sum of:
        0.070937335 = product of:
          0.14187467 = sum of:
            0.14187467 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14187467 = score(doc=3028,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.4689965 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Scientific abstracts reproduce only part of the information and the complexity of argumentation in a scientific article. The purpose of this paper provides a first analysis of the similarity between the text of scientific abstracts and the body of articles, using sentences as the basic textual unit. It contributes to the understanding of the structure of abstracts. Design/methodology/approach - Using sentence-based similarity metrics, the authors quantify the phenomenon of text re-use in abstracts and examine the positions of the sentences that are similar to sentences in abstracts in the introduction, methods, results and discussion structure, using a corpus of over 85,000 research articles published in the seven Public Library of Science journals. Findings - The authors provide evidence that 84 percent of abstract have at least one sentence in common with the body of the paper. Studying the distributions of sentences in the body of the articles that are re-used in abstracts, the authors show that there exists a strong relation between the rhetorical structure of articles and the zones that authors re-use when writing abstracts, with sentences mainly coming from the beginning of the introduction and the end of the conclusion. Originality/value - Scientific abstracts contain what is considered by the author(s) as information that best describe documents' content. This is a first study that examines the relation between the contents of abstracts and the rhetorical structure of scientific articles. The work might provide new insight for improving automatic abstracting tools as well as information retrieval approaches, in which text organization and structure are important features.
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  12. Plaza, L.; Stevenson, M.; Díaz, A.: Resolving ambiguity in biomedical text to improve summarization (2012) 0.04
    0.03511219 = product of:
      0.07022438 = sum of:
        0.07022438 = product of:
          0.14044876 = sum of:
            0.14044876 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14044876 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.46428284 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  13. Xiong, S.; Ji, D.: Query-focused multi-document summarization using hypergraph-based ranking (2016) 0.04
    0.03511219 = product of:
      0.07022438 = sum of:
        0.07022438 = product of:
          0.14044876 = sum of:
            0.14044876 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14044876 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.46428284 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  14. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.03
    0.033347823 = product of:
      0.066695645 = sum of:
        0.066695645 = product of:
          0.20008692 = sum of:
            0.20008692 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20008692 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  15. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.03
    0.033347823 = product of:
      0.066695645 = sum of:
        0.066695645 = product of:
          0.20008692 = sum of:
            0.20008692 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20008692 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  16. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.03
    0.033347823 = product of:
      0.066695645 = sum of:
        0.066695645 = product of:
          0.20008692 = sum of:
            0.20008692 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20008692 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42721814 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  17. Wang, W.; Hwang, D.: Abstraction Assistant : an automatic text abstraction system (2010) 0.03
    0.030096164 = product of:
      0.060192328 = sum of:
        0.060192328 = product of:
          0.120384656 = sum of:
            0.120384656 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120384656 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  18. Guerrini, M.: Cataloguing based on bibliographic axiology (2010) 0.03
    0.030096164 = product of:
      0.060192328 = sum of:
        0.060192328 = product of:
          0.120384656 = sum of:
            0.120384656 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120384656 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the work of Elaine Svenonius The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, translated in Italian and published by Le Lettere of Florence, within the series Pinakes, with the title Il fondamento intellettuale dell'organizzazione dell'informazione. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization defines the theoretical aspects of library science, its philosophical basics and principles, the purposes that must be kept in mind, abstracting from the technology used in a library. The book deals with information organization and bibliographic universe, in particular using the bibliographic entities defined in FRBR, at first. Then, it analyzes all the specific languages by which works and subjects are treated. This work, already acknowledged as a classic, organizes, synthesizes and make easily understood the whole complex of knowledge, practices and procedures developed in the last 150 years.
  19. Abdi, A.; Idris, N.; Alguliev, R.M.; Aliguliyev, R.M.: Automatic summarization assessment through a combination of semantic and syntactic information for intelligent educational systems (2015) 0.03
    0.030096164 = product of:
      0.060192328 = sum of:
        0.060192328 = product of:
          0.120384656 = sum of:
            0.120384656 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120384656 = score(doc=2681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 2681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting
  20. Xu, D.; Cheng, G.; Qu, Y.: Preferences in Wikipedia abstracts : empirical findings and implications for automatic entity summarization (2014) 0.03
    0.030096164 = product of:
      0.060192328 = sum of:
        0.060192328 = product of:
          0.120384656 = sum of:
            0.120384656 = weight(_text_:abstracting in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120384656 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3025069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050391316 = queryNorm
                0.39795673 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Abstracting

Languages

  • e 492
  • d 180
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 590
  • el 60
  • m 48
  • s 16
  • x 12
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications