Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Schabas, A.H.: ¬A comparative evaluation of the retrieval effectiveness of titles, Library of Congress Subject Headings and PRECIS strings for computer searching of UK MARC data (1979) 0.03
    0.029286603 = product of:
      0.14643301 = sum of:
        0.14643301 = weight(_text_:verbale in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14643301 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.75284255 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  2. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998) 0.02
    0.020708755 = product of:
      0.10354377 = sum of:
        0.10354377 = weight(_text_:verbale in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10354377 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.53234005 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Keen, E.M.: Aspects of computer-based indexing languages (1991) 0.02
    0.019524401 = product of:
      0.09762201 = sum of:
        0.09762201 = weight(_text_:verbale in 5072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09762201 = score(doc=5072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.501895 = fieldWeight in 5072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5072)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Voorbij, H.: ¬Een goede titel behoeft geen trefwoord, of toch wel? : een vergelijkend oderzoek titelwoorden - trefwoorden (1997) 0.02
    0.017083852 = product of:
      0.08541925 = sum of:
        0.08541925 = weight(_text_:verbale in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08541925 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.43915814 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  5. Schabas, A.H.: Postcoordinate retrieval : a comparison of two retrieval languages (1982) 0.01
    0.014643301 = product of:
      0.073216505 = sum of:
        0.073216505 = weight(_text_:verbale in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073216505 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.37642127 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. McJunkin, M.C.: Precision and recall in title keyword searching (1995) 0.01
    0.014643301 = product of:
      0.073216505 = sum of:
        0.073216505 = weight(_text_:verbale in 3351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073216505 = score(doc=3351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.37642127 = fieldWeight in 3351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3351)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.01
    0.014643301 = product of:
      0.073216505 = sum of:
        0.073216505 = weight(_text_:verbale in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073216505 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19450682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034254447 = queryNorm
            0.37642127 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  8. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.00
    0.0032487032 = product of:
      0.016243516 = sum of:
        0.016243516 = product of:
          0.06497406 = sum of:
            0.06497406 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06497406 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  9. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.00
    0.0032487032 = product of:
      0.016243516 = sum of:
        0.016243516 = product of:
          0.06497406 = sum of:
            0.06497406 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06497406 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  10. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.00
    0.0032487032 = product of:
      0.016243516 = sum of:
        0.016243516 = product of:
          0.06497406 = sum of:
            0.06497406 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06497406 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  11. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.00
    0.0032487032 = product of:
      0.016243516 = sum of:
        0.016243516 = product of:
          0.06497406 = sum of:
            0.06497406 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06497406 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  12. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.00
    0.0023205024 = product of:
      0.011602512 = sum of:
        0.011602512 = product of:
          0.046410047 = sum of:
            0.046410047 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046410047 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  13. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.00
    0.0023205024 = product of:
      0.011602512 = sum of:
        0.011602512 = product of:
          0.046410047 = sum of:
            0.046410047 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046410047 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  14. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.0023205024 = product of:
      0.011602512 = sum of:
        0.011602512 = product of:
          0.046410047 = sum of:
            0.046410047 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046410047 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  15. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.00
    0.0018564019 = product of:
      0.00928201 = sum of:
        0.00928201 = product of:
          0.03712804 = sum of:
            0.03712804 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03712804 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  16. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.00
    0.0018564019 = product of:
      0.00928201 = sum of:
        0.00928201 = product of:
          0.03712804 = sum of:
            0.03712804 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03712804 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  17. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.00
    0.0018564019 = product of:
      0.00928201 = sum of:
        0.00928201 = product of:
          0.03712804 = sum of:
            0.03712804 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03712804 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  18. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.00
    0.0018564019 = product of:
      0.00928201 = sum of:
        0.00928201 = product of:
          0.03712804 = sum of:
            0.03712804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03712804 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  19. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.00
    0.0018564019 = product of:
      0.00928201 = sum of:
        0.00928201 = product of:
          0.03712804 = sum of:
            0.03712804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03712804 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  20. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.00
    0.0018564019 = product of:
      0.00928201 = sum of:
        0.00928201 = product of:
          0.03712804 = sum of:
            0.03712804 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03712804 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11995324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034254447 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht

Languages

  • e 37
  • d 3
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 37
  • m 3
  • s 3
  • d 1
  • More… Less…