-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.05
0.04727865 = product of:
0.0945573 = sum of:
0.0945573 = sum of:
0.044986304 = weight(_text_:software in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044986304 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.049571 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049571 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Farkas, M.G.: Social software in libraries : building collaboration, communication, and community online (2007)
0.04
0.035706773 = product of:
0.07141355 = sum of:
0.07141355 = product of:
0.1428271 = sum of:
0.1428271 = weight(_text_:software in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1428271 = score(doc=2364,freq=14.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.6957995 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Inhalt: What is social software? -- Blogs -- Blogs in libraries : practical applications -- RSS -- Wikis -- Online communities -- Social networking -- Social bookmarking and collaborative filtering -- Tools for synchronous online reference -- The mobile revolution -- Podcasting -- Screencasting and vodcasting -- Gaming -- What will work @ your library -- Keeping up : a primer -- Future trends in social software.
- RSWK
- Bibliothek / Soziale Software
Soziale Software / Bibliothek
- Subject
- Bibliothek / Soziale Software
Soziale Software / Bibliothek
-
Komus, A.; Wauch, F.: Wikimanagement : was Unternehmen von Social-Software und Web 2.0 lernen können (2008)
0.03
0.026991783 = product of:
0.053983565 = sum of:
0.053983565 = product of:
0.10796713 = sum of:
0.10796713 = weight(_text_:software in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10796713 = score(doc=508,freq=18.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.525975 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Wie schaffen es hunderttausende Menschen in ihrer Freizeit eine Enzyklopädie zu erstellen, die in der Qualität der seit Jahrhunderten renommierten Brockhaus-Enzyklopädie in nichts nachsteht und in der Quantität weit übertrifft? Warum veröffentlichen Millionen von Internetnutzern ihre Urlaubsbilder und Videos aus dem privaten Leben im Netz? Wieso funktioniert die Informationsversorgung durch Touristen und Privatleute oftmals besser als die Berichterstattung der großen Agenturen? Und warum versprechen sich Unternehmen wie Google oder die Holtzbrinck Gruppe so viel von derartigen Plattformen, dass deren Gründer über Nacht zu Millionären werden? Wie schaffte es eine australische Brauerei, vom Business Plan bis zur Produktionsplanung alle Prozesse von einer Internet-Community entwickeln zu lassen? Wie passt die lose Kollaboration im Netz zu mühsam ausgearbeiteten und über viele Jahrzehnte untersuchten Organisationsmodellen in Unternehmen? Was können Unternehmen von Wikipedia & Co lernen? Wikimanagement gibt nicht nur einen ausführlichen Überblick über die aktuelle Welt des Web 2.0, sondern stellt auch die Funktionsweise der Wikipedia und anderer Social Software-Systeme den wichtigsten organisationstheoretischen Ansätzen gegenüber. In Anwendungsfeldern wie Innovation, Projektmanagement, Marketing und vielen anderen wird deutlich gemacht, wie Unternehmen von Social Software-Technologie und -Philosophie lernen und profitieren können.
- Content
- Inhalt: I. Wie funktionieren Social Software-Angebote? II. Welchen Erklärungsbeitrag leisten bestehende Organisationsansätze und welche Schlüsse muss die Organisationslehre aus den Erfahrungen ziehen? III. Welches sind die Erfolgsfaktoren von Social Software und wie lassen sich Technologie und Erfolgsfaktoren in das Management übertragen und in Unternehmen nutzen?
- RSWK
- Management / Soziale Software / Leitbild
Unternehmen / Soziale Software (BVB)
- Subject
- Management / Soziale Software / Leitbild
Unternehmen / Soziale Software (BVB)
-
Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008)
0.03
0.025448097 = product of:
0.050896194 = sum of:
0.050896194 = product of:
0.10179239 = sum of:
0.10179239 = weight(_text_:software in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10179239 = score(doc=2306,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen eines Projekts gingen Studierende an der HAW Hamburg für ihre Auftraggeber Lycos Europe und T-Online der Frage nach, wie sich Inhalte aus sozialen Suchdiensten in die algorithmische Suche einbinden lassen. Dazu analysierten und verglichen sie die Vor- und Nachteile der Systeme, die Relevanz der Suchergebnisse, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit sowie die Qualität der Inhalte. Für soziale Software ergaben sich daraus bedeutende Verbesserungspotentiale. Der Text beschreibt die Ergebnisse und die Empfehlungen für Lycos IQ.
-
Heckner, M.: Tagging, rating, posting : studying forms of user contribution for web-based information management and information retrieval (2009)
0.02
0.019479642 = product of:
0.038959283 = sum of:
0.038959283 = product of:
0.07791857 = sum of:
0.07791857 = weight(_text_:software in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07791857 = score(doc=2931,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.37958977 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Entstehung von Social Software ermöglicht es Nutzern, in großem Umfang im Netz zu publizieren. Bisher liegen aber nur wenige empirische Befunde zu funktionalen Eigenschaften sowie Qualitätsaspekten von Nutzerbeiträgen im Kontext von Informationsmanagement und Information Retrieval vor. Diese Arbeit diskutiert grundlegende Partizipationsformen, präsentiert empirische Studien über Social Tagging, Blogbeiträge sowie Relevanzbeurteilungen und entwickelt Design und Implementierung einer "sozialen" Informationsarchitektur für ein partizipatives Onlinehilfesystem.
- RSWK
- World Wide Web 2.0 / Benutzer / Online-Publizieren / Information Retrieval / Soziale Software / Hilfesystem
- Subject
- World Wide Web 2.0 / Benutzer / Online-Publizieren / Information Retrieval / Soziale Software / Hilfesystem
-
Wolfram, D.; Olson, H.A.; Bloom, R.: Measuring consistency for multiple taggers using vector space modeling (2009)
0.02
0.019086074 = product of:
0.03817215 = sum of:
0.03817215 = product of:
0.0763443 = sum of:
0.0763443 = weight(_text_:software in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0763443 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.3719205 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A longstanding area of study in indexing is the identification of factors affecting vocabulary usage and consistency. This topic has seen a recent resurgence with a focus on social tagging. Tagging data for scholarly articles made available by the social bookmarking Website CiteULike (www.citeulike.org) were used to test the use of inter-indexer/tagger consistency density values, based on a method developed by the authors by comparing calculations for highly tagged documents representing three subject areas (Science, Social Science, Social Software). The analysis revealed that the developed method is viable for a large dataset. The findings also indicated that there were no significant differences in tagging consistency among the three topic areas, demonstrating that vocabulary usage in a relatively new subject area like social software is no more inconsistent than the more established subject areas investigated. The implications of the method used and the findings are discussed.
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.01
0.014020796 = product of:
0.028041592 = sum of:
0.028041592 = product of:
0.056083184 = sum of:
0.056083184 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056083184 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Kipp, M.E.I.: Searching with tags : do tags help users find things? (2008)
0.01
0.013495891 = product of:
0.026991783 = sum of:
0.026991783 = product of:
0.053983565 = sum of:
0.053983565 = weight(_text_:software in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053983565 = score(doc=2278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This study examines the question of whether tags can be useful in the process of information retrieval. Participants were asked to search a social bookmarking tool specialising in academic articles (CiteULike) and an online journal database (Pubmed) in order to determine if users found tags were useful in their search process. The actions of each participants were captured using screen capture software and they were asked to describe their search process. The preliminary study showed that users did indeed make use of tags in their search process, as a guide to searching and as hyperlinks to potentially useful articles. However, users also made use of controlled vocabularies in the journal database.
-
Kuchler, T.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Zimmermann, V.: Social Tagging and Open Content : a concept for the future of e-learning and knowledge management? (2008)
0.01
0.013495891 = product of:
0.026991783 = sum of:
0.026991783 = product of:
0.053983565 = sum of:
0.053983565 = weight(_text_:software in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053983565 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open Content is a promising concept for e-learning and knowledge management. It can improve sharing and re-using educational resources and create new business opportunities. However, in contrast to open source software, these opportunities have not yet been adopted by a wide community. This article discusses barriers and opportunities. The Content Explosion Model shows how content can be re-used and adapted to increase sharing and distributing Open Content. Social tagging is discussed, on the basis of an implementation example (SLIDESTAR), as a means of fostering content exchange on a content community platform.
-
Heuwing, B.: Erfahrungen an der Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim : Social Tagging in Bibliotheken (2010)
0.01
0.013495891 = product of:
0.026991783 = sum of:
0.026991783 = product of:
0.053983565 = sum of:
0.053983565 = weight(_text_:software in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053983565 = score(doc=4013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Der Einsatz von Social Software in Bibliotheken und die damit angestrebte Erweiterung und Öffnung ihrer Angebote hat in den letzten Jahren viel Aufmerksamkeit auf sich gezogen. Für die Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim wurde prototypisch ein Social Tagging Dienst umgesetzt und im Praxiseinsatz evaluiert (vgl. Heuwing 2008). Nutzer hatten dabei die Möglichkeit, für die im Online-Katalog vorhandenen Ressourcen selbst gewählte Schlagworte vergeben zu können. Das Angebot wurde von der Gruppe von Testnutzern positiv angenommen und auf vielfältige Weise eingesetzt. Eine Nutzerbefragung zeigt, dass die Motivation für die Nutzung vor allem im Austausch unter den Studierenden lag, während die Verwaltung persönlicher Informationsressourcen nur einer kleineren Gruppe wichtig war. Die Ergebnisse des Projektes verdeutlichen das Potential von Social Tagging an Universitäten und zeigen Möglichkeiten für die Integration mit lokalen Anwendungen und übergreifenden Diensten.
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.01
0.012268197 = product of:
0.024536394 = sum of:
0.024536394 = product of:
0.049072787 = sum of:
0.049072787 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049072787 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
-
Kipp, M.E.I.; Campbell, D.G.: Searching with tags : do tags help users find things? (2010)
0.01
0.011246576 = product of:
0.022493152 = sum of:
0.022493152 = product of:
0.044986304 = sum of:
0.044986304 = weight(_text_:software in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044986304 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The question of whether tags can be useful in the process of information retrieval was examined in this pilot study. Many tags are subject related and could work well as index terms or entry vocabulary; however, folksonomies also include relationships that are traditionally not included in controlled vocabularies including affective or time and task related tags and the user name of the tagger. Participants searched a social bookmarking tool, specialising in academic articles (CiteULike), and an online journal database (Pubmed) for articles relevant to a given information request. Screen capture software was used to collect participant actions and a semi-structured interview asked them to describe their search process. Preliminary results showed that participants did use tags in their search process, as a guide to searching and as hyperlinks to potentially useful articles. However, participants also used controlled vocabularies in the journal database to locate useful search terms and links to related articles supplied by Pubmed. Additionally, participants reported using user names of taggers and group names to help select resources by relevance. The inclusion of subjective and social information from the taggers is very different from the traditional objectivity of indexing and was reported as an asset by a number of participants. This study suggests that while users value social and subjective factors when searching, they also find utility in objective factors such as subject headings. Most importantly, users are interested in the ability of systems to connect them with related articles whether via subject access or other means.
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005)
0.01
0.011133543 = product of:
0.022267086 = sum of:
0.022267086 = product of:
0.044534173 = sum of:
0.044534173 = weight(_text_:software in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044534173 = score(doc=1188,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20527047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.21695362 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Because, to paraphrase a pop music lyric from a certain rock and roll band of yesterday, "the Web is old, the Web is new, the Web is all, the Web is you", it seems like we might have to face up to some of these stark realities. With the introduction of new social software applications such as blogs, wikis, newsfeeds, social networks, and bookmarking tools (the subject of this paper), the claim that Shelley Powers makes in a Burningbird blog entry seems apposite: "This is the user's web now, which means it's my web and I can make the rules." Reinvention is revolution - it brings us always back to beginnings. We are here going to remind you of hyperlinks in all their glory, sell you on the idea of bookmarking hyperlinks, point you at other folks who are doing the same, and tell you why this is a good thing. Just as long as those hyperlinks (or let's call them plain old links) are managed, tagged, commented upon, and published onto the Web, they represent a user's own personal library placed on public record, which - when aggregated with other personal libraries - allows for rich, social networking opportunities. Why spill any ink (digital or not) in rewriting what someone else has already written about instead of just pointing at the original story and adding the merest of titles, descriptions and tags for future reference? More importantly, why not make these personal 'link playlists' available to oneself and to others from whatever browser or computer one happens to be using at the time? This paper reviews some current initiatives, as of early 2005, in providing public link management applications on the Web - utilities that are often referred to under the general moniker of 'social bookmarking tools'. There are a couple of things going on here: 1) server-side software aimed specifically at managing links with, crucially, a strong, social networking flavour, and 2) an unabashedly open and unstructured approach to tagging, or user classification, of those links.
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.01
0.010515597 = product of:
0.021031193 = sum of:
0.021031193 = product of:
0.042062387 = sum of:
0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042062387 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.01
0.010515597 = product of:
0.021031193 = sum of:
0.021031193 = product of:
0.042062387 = sum of:
0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042062387 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.01
0.010515597 = product of:
0.021031193 = sum of:
0.021031193 = product of:
0.042062387 = sum of:
0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042062387 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.01
0.010515597 = product of:
0.021031193 = sum of:
0.021031193 = product of:
0.042062387 = sum of:
0.042062387 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042062387 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.01
0.008762998 = product of:
0.017525995 = sum of:
0.017525995 = product of:
0.03505199 = sum of:
0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03505199 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.01
0.008762998 = product of:
0.017525995 = sum of:
0.017525995 = product of:
0.03505199 = sum of:
0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03505199 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.008762998 = product of:
0.017525995 = sum of:
0.017525995 = product of:
0.03505199 = sum of:
0.03505199 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03505199 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18119352 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051742528 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
