Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ellis, D."
  1. Ellis, D.: Hypertext; origins and use (1991) 0.02
    0.021490699 = product of:
      0.064472094 = sum of:
        0.064472094 = weight(_text_:management in 4916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064472094 = score(doc=4916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4916)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    International journal of information management. 11(1991) no.1, S.5-13
  2. Ellis, D.: ¬A behavioral approach to information system design (1989) 0.02
    0.015011381 = product of:
      0.045034144 = sum of:
        0.045034144 = product of:
          0.09006829 = sum of:
            0.09006829 = weight(_text_:system in 2706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09006829 = score(doc=2706,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 2706, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2706)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Ellis, D.: ¬A behavioral model for information retrieval system design (1989) 0.02
    0.015011381 = product of:
      0.045034144 = sum of:
        0.045034144 = product of:
          0.09006829 = sum of:
            0.09006829 = weight(_text_:system in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09006829 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  4. Ellis, D.; Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: Measuring the degree of similarity between objects in text retrieval systems (1993) 0.01
    0.01289442 = product of:
      0.038683258 = sum of:
        0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 6716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038683258 = score(doc=6716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 6716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6716)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Perspectives in information management. 3(1993) no.2, S.128-149
  5. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.00927861 = product of:
      0.02783583 = sum of:
        0.02783583 = product of:
          0.05567166 = sum of:
            0.05567166 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05567166 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  6. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Lam, H.M.; Burton, R.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 5: user-intermediary interaction (2002) 0.01
    0.0056292685 = product of:
      0.016887804 = sum of:
        0.016887804 = product of:
          0.03377561 = sum of:
            0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03377561 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ellis, et alia, now provide part five of their study on mediated searching which is treated separately here because of the presence of additional authors. The data source remains cases collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K. but the focus here is on seeker/intermediary interaction utilizing the Saracevic triadic IR model, and the method is the analysis of discourse. While the pre-search interview stressed problem definition, interaction during the search in terms of relevance and magnitude continued to develop the problem statement. The user and intermediary focused on search tactics, review and relevance, while the intermediary interaction with the system was comprised of terminology and answers. The interaction clearly affected the search process. Users and intermediaries considered the process effective and users felt the intermediary increased their overall satisfaction.
  7. Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999) 0.01
    0.0056292685 = product of:
      0.016887804 = sum of:
        0.016887804 = product of:
          0.03377561 = sum of:
            0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03377561 = score(doc=726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
  8. Ellis, D.; Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of inter-linker consistency (1994) 0.00
    0.004691057 = product of:
      0.01407317 = sum of:
        0.01407317 = product of:
          0.02814634 = sum of:
            0.02814634 = weight(_text_:system in 7493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02814634 = score(doc=7493,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 7493, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In important stage in the process of retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of inter-nodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. Studies of conventional systems have suggested that a degree of consistency in the terms assigned to documents by indexers is positively associated with retrieval effectiveness. It is thus of interest to investigate the consistency of assignment of links in separate hypertext versions of the same full-text document, since a measure of agreement may be related to the subsequent utility of the resulting hypertext databases. The calculation of values indicating the degree of similarity between objects is a technique that has been widely used in the fields of textual and chemical information retrieval; in this paper we describe the application of arithmetic coefficients and topological indices to the measurement of the degree of similarity between the sets of inter-nodal links in hypertext databases. We publish the results of a study in which several different of links are inserted, by different people, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. Our results show little similary between the sets of links identified by different people; this finding is comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, where it has been found that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of idenx terms assigned to a document by different indexers
  9. Ellis, D.: ¬The dilemma of measurement in information retrieval research (1996) 0.00
    0.004691057 = product of:
      0.01407317 = sum of:
        0.01407317 = product of:
          0.02814634 = sum of:
            0.02814634 = weight(_text_:system in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02814634 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The problem of measurement in information retrieval research is traced to its source in the first retrieval tests. The problem is seen as presenting a chronic dilemma for the field. This dilemma has taken 3 forms as the discipline has evloved: (1) the dilemma of measurement in the archetypal approach: stated relevance versus user relevance; (2) the dilemma of measurement in the probabilistic approach: realism versus formalism; and (3) the dilemma of measurement in the Information Retrieval-Expert System (IR-ES) approach: linear measures of relevance versus logarithmic measures of knowledge. It is argued that the dilemma of measurement has remained intractable even given the different assumptions of the different approaches for 3 connecte reasons - the nature of the subject matter of the field; the nature of relevance jidgement; and the nature of cognition and knowledge. Finally, it is concluded that the original vision of information retrieval research as a discipline founded on quantification proved restricting for its theoretical and methodological development and that increasing recognition of this is reflected in growing interest in qualitative methods in information retrieval research in relation to cognitive, behavioral, and affective aspects of the information retrieval interaction
  10. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.00
    0.004691057 = product of:
      0.01407317 = sum of:
        0.01407317 = product of:
          0.02814634 = sum of:
            0.02814634 = weight(_text_:system in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02814634 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency