Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Salton, G."
  1. Salton, G.: ¬The state of retrieval system evaluation (1992) 0.05
    0.0493965 = product of:
      0.07409475 = sum of:
        0.051577676 = weight(_text_:management in 5250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051577676 = score(doc=5250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5250)
        0.022517072 = product of:
          0.045034144 = sum of:
            0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 5250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045034144 = score(doc=5250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 28(1992) no.4, S.441-449
  2. Salton, G.; Voorhees, E.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A comparison of two methods for Boolean query relevance feedback (1984) 0.03
    0.03438512 = product of:
      0.10315535 = sum of:
        0.10315535 = weight(_text_:management in 5446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10315535 = score(doc=5446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5446)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.637-651
  3. Salton, G.; Waldstein, R.H.: Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval (1978) 0.03
    0.03438512 = product of:
      0.10315535 = sum of:
        0.10315535 = weight(_text_:management in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10315535 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 14(1978), S.20-35
  4. Salton, G.: ¬A simple blueprint for automatic Boolean query processing (1988) 0.03
    0.03438512 = product of:
      0.10315535 = sum of:
        0.10315535 = weight(_text_:management in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10315535 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 24(1988) no.3, S.269-280
  5. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.; Smith, M.: On the application of syntactic methodologies in automatic text analysis (1990) 0.03
    0.030086977 = product of:
      0.09026093 = sum of:
        0.09026093 = weight(_text_:management in 7864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09026093 = score(doc=7864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 7864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7864)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990) no.1, S.73-92
  6. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988) 0.03
    0.02578884 = product of:
      0.077366516 = sum of:
        0.077366516 = weight(_text_:management in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077366516 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 24(1988) no.5, S.513-523
  7. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Singhal, A.: Automatic text decomposition and structuring (1996) 0.02
    0.01719256 = product of:
      0.051577676 = sum of:
        0.051577676 = weight(_text_:management in 4067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051577676 = score(doc=4067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4067)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.127-138
  8. Salton, G.: Automatic text structuring and summarization (1997) 0.02
    0.015043489 = product of:
      0.045130465 = sum of:
        0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045130465 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.2, S.193-207
  9. Buckley, C.; Allan, J.; Salton, G.: Automatic routing and retrieval using Smart : TREC-2 (1995) 0.01
    0.01289442 = product of:
      0.038683258 = sum of:
        0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 5699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038683258 = score(doc=5699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5699)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.315-326
  10. Salton, G.: SMART System: 1961-1976 (2009) 0.01
    0.01061465 = product of:
      0.03184395 = sum of:
        0.03184395 = product of:
          0.0636879 = sum of:
            0.0636879 = weight(_text_:system in 3879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0636879 = score(doc=3879,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 3879, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    While a number of researchers had experimented during the 1950's on automatic indexing and retrieval in various forms, it was Gerard Salton who brought the information retrieval experimental paradigm to full fruition, with his "SMART" system. His work has been enormously influential.
  11. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.01
    0.009382114 = product of:
      0.02814634 = sum of:
        0.02814634 = product of:
          0.05629268 = sum of:
            0.05629268 = weight(_text_:system in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05629268 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  12. Salton, G.: Thoughts about modern retrieval technologies (1988) 0.01
    0.009287819 = product of:
      0.027863456 = sum of:
        0.027863456 = product of:
          0.055726912 = sum of:
            0.055726912 = weight(_text_:system in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055726912 = score(doc=1522,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the National Federation of Astracting and Information Services, Philadelphia, 28 Feb-2 Mar 88. In recent years, the amount and the variety of available machine-readable data, new technologies have been introduced, such as high density storage devices, and fancy graphic displays useful for information transformation and access. New approaches have also been considered for processing the stored data based on the construction of knowledge bases representing the contents and structure of the information, and the use of expert system techniques to control the user-system interactions. Provides a brief evaluation of the new information processing technologies, and of the software methods proposed for information manipulation.
  13. Salton, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents (1985) 0.01
    0.0075056907 = product of:
      0.022517072 = sum of:
        0.022517072 = product of:
          0.045034144 = sum of:
            0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 3650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045034144 = score(doc=3650,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 3650, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The attempt to computerize a process, such as indexing, abstracting, classifying, or retrieving information, begins with an analysis of the process into its intellectual and nonintellectual components. That part of the process which is amenable to computerization is mechanical or algorithmic. What is not is intellectual or creative and requires human intervention. Gerard Salton has been an innovator, experimenter, and promoter in the area of mechanized information systems since the early 1960s. He has been particularly ingenious at analyzing the process of information retrieval into its algorithmic components. He received a doctorate in applied mathematics from Harvard University before moving to the computer science department at Cornell, where he developed a prototype automatic retrieval system called SMART. Working with this system he and his students contributed for over a decade to our theoretical understanding of the retrieval process. On a more practical level, they have contributed design criteria for operating retrieval systems. The following selection presents one of the early descriptions of the SMART system; it is valuable as it shows the direction automatic retrieval methods were to take beyond simple word-matching techniques. These include various word normalization techniques to improve recall, for instance, the separation of words into stems and affixes; the correlation and clustering, using statistical association measures, of related terms; and the identification, using a concept thesaurus, of synonymous, broader, narrower, and sibling terms. They include, as weIl, techniques, both linguistic and statistical, to deal with the thorny problem of how to automatically extract from texts index terms that consist of more than one word. They include weighting techniques and various documentrequest matching algorithms. Significant among the latter are those which produce a retrieval output of citations ranked in relevante order. During the 1970s, Salton and his students went an to further refine these various techniques, particularly the weighting and statistical association measures. Many of their early innovations seem commonplace today. Some of their later techniques are still ahead of their time and await technological developments for implementation. The particular focus of the selection that follows is an the evaluation of a particular component of the SMART system, a multilingual thesaurus. By mapping English language expressions and their German equivalents to a common concept number, the thesaurus permitted the automatic processing of German language documents against English language queries and vice versa. The results of the evaluation, as it turned out, were somewhat inconclusive. However, this SMART experiment suggested in a bold and optimistic way how one might proceed to answer such complex questions as What is meant by retrieval language compatability? How it is to be achieved, and how evaluated?
  14. Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Approaches to global text analysis (1990) 0.01
    0.0065674796 = product of:
      0.019702438 = sum of:
        0.019702438 = product of:
          0.039404877 = sum of:
            0.039404877 = weight(_text_:system in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039404877 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Current approaches to the analysis of natural language text are not viable for documents of unrestricted scope. A global text analysis system is proposed designed to identify homogeneous text environments in which the meaning of text words and phrases remains unambiguous, and useful term relationships may be automatically determined. The proposed methods include document clustering methods, as well as comparisons of local document excerpts in specified global contexts, leading to structured text representations in which similar texts, or text excerpts, are appropriately linked
  15. Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969) 0.01
    0.0065674796 = product of:
      0.019702438 = sum of:
        0.019702438 = product of:
          0.039404877 = sum of:
            0.039404877 = weight(_text_:system in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039404877 = score(doc=4151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)