-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.07
0.065495595 = product of:
0.098243386 = sum of:
0.077366516 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077366516 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.020876871 = product of:
0.041753743 = sum of:
0.041753743 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041753743 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.06
0.06020437 = product of:
0.09030656 = sum of:
0.055834472 = weight(_text_:management in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055834472 = score(doc=1013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.034472086 = product of:
0.06894417 = sum of:
0.06894417 = weight(_text_:system in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06894417 = score(doc=1013,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.42618635 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.313-330
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.05
0.0493965 = product of:
0.07409475 = sum of:
0.051577676 = weight(_text_:management in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051577676 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.022517072 = product of:
0.045034144 = sum of:
0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045034144 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1395-1402
-
Tho, Q.T.; Hui, S.C.; Fong, A.C.M.: ¬A citation-based document retrieval system for finding research expertise (2007)
0.05
0.04830591 = product of:
0.07245886 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
0.03377561 = product of:
0.06755122 = sum of:
0.06755122 = weight(_text_:system in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06755122 = score(doc=956,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Current citation-based document retrieval systems generally offer only limited search facilities, such as author search. In order to facilitate more advanced search functions, we have developed a significantly improved system that employs two novel techniques: Context-based Cluster Analysis (CCA) and Context-based Ontology Generation frAmework (COGA). CCA aims to extract relevant information from clusters originally obtained from disparate clustering methods by building relationships between them. The built relationships are then represented as formal context using the Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) technique. COGA aims to generate ontology from clusters relationship built by CCA. By combining these two techniques, we are able to perform ontology learning from a citation database using clustering results. We have implemented the improved system and have demonstrated its use for finding research domain expertise. We have also conducted performance evaluation on the system and the results are encouraging.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.248-264
-
Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005)
0.05
0.04830591 = product of:
0.07245886 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.03377561 = product of:
0.06755122 = sum of:
0.06755122 = weight(_text_:system in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06755122 = score(doc=1011,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Citation analysis is performed in order to evaluate authors and scientific collections, such as journals and conference proceedings. Currently, two major systems exist that perform citation analysis: Science Citation Index (SCI) by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and CiteSeer by the NEC Research Institute. The SCI, mostly a manual system up until recently, is based on the notion of the ISI Impact Factor, which has been used extensively for citation analysis purposes. On the other hand the CiteSeer system is an automatically built digital library using agents technology, also based on the notion of ISI Impact Factor. In this paper, we investigate new alternative notions besides the ISI impact factor, in order to provide a novel approach aiming at ranking scientific collections. Furthermore, we present a web-based system that has been built by extracting data from the Databases and Logic Programming (DBLP) website of the University of Trier. Our system, by using the new citation metrics, emerges as a useful tool for ranking scientific collections. In this respect, some first remarks are presented, e.g. on ranking conferences related to databases.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.289-312
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.05
0.046605095 = product of:
0.06990764 = sum of:
0.055834472 = weight(_text_:management in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055834472 = score(doc=5767,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.01407317 = product of:
0.02814634 = sum of:
0.02814634 = weight(_text_:system in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02814634 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.04
0.043221936 = product of:
0.0648329 = sum of:
0.045130465 = weight(_text_:management in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045130465 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.019702438 = product of:
0.039404877 = sum of:
0.039404877 = weight(_text_:system in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039404877 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article reveals different patterns of scholarly communication in the XML research field on the Web and in print journals in terms of author visibility, and challenges the common practice of exclusively using the ISI's databases to obtain citation counts as scientific performance indicators. Results from this study demonstrate both the importance and the feasibility of the use of multiple citation data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication, and provide evidence for a developing "two tier" scholarly communication system.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
-
Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003)
0.04
0.041710816 = product of:
0.06256622 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.02388296 = product of:
0.04776592 = sum of:
0.04776592 = weight(_text_:system in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04776592 = score(doc=1080,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Author searching is traditionally based on the matching of name strings. Special characteristics of authors as personal names and subject indicators are not considered. This makes it difficult to identify a set of related authors or to group authors by subjects in retrieval systems. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of a prototype visualization system to enhance author searching. The system, called AuthorLink, is based on author co-citation analysis and visualization mapping algorithms such as Kohonen's feature maps and Pathfinder networks. AuthorLink produces interactive author maps in real time from a database of 1.26 million records supplied by the Institute for Scientific Information. The maps show subject groupings and more fine-grained intellectual connections among authors. Through the interactive interface the user can take advantage of such information to refine queries and retrieve documents through point-and-click manipulation of the authors' names.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.689-706
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.04
0.03970675 = product of:
0.059560128 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.020876871 = product of:
0.041753743 = sum of:
0.041753743 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041753743 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Moed, H.F.; Leeuwen, T.N. van; Reedijk, J.: ¬A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors (1998)
0.04
0.039325334 = product of:
0.058987997 = sum of:
0.036470924 = weight(_text_:management in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036470924 = score(doc=4719,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.21066327 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.022517072 = product of:
0.045034144 = sum of:
0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045034144 = score(doc=4719,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- During the past decades, journal impact data obtained from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) have gained relevance in library management, research management and research evaluation. Hence, both information scientists and bibliometricians share the responsibility towards the users of the JCR to analyse the reliability and validity of its measures thoroughly, to indicate pitfalls and to suggest possible improvements. In this article, ageing patterns are examined in 'formal' use or impact of all scientific journals processed for the Science Citation Index (SCI) during 1981-1995. A new classification system of journals in terms of their ageing characteristics is introduced. This system has been applied to as many as 3,098 journals covered by the Science Citation Index. Following an earlier suggestion by Glnzel and Schoepflin, a maturing and a decline phase are distinguished. From an analysis across all subfields it has been concluded that ageing characteristics are primarily specific to the individual journal rather than to the subfield, while the distribution of journals in terms of slowly or rapidly maturing or declining types is specific to the subfield. It is shown that the cited half life (CHL), printed in the JCR, is an inappropriate measure of decline of journal impact. Following earlier work by Line and others, a more adequate parameter of decline is calculated taking into account the size of annual volumes during a range of fifteen years. For 76 per cent of SCI journals the relative difference between this new parameter and the ISI CHL exceeds 5 per cent. The current JCR journal impact factor is proven to be biased towards journals revealing a rapid maturing and decline in impact. Therefore, a longer term impact factor is proposed, as well as a normalised impact statistic, taking into account citation characteristics of the research subfield covered by a journal and the type of documents published in it. When these new measures are combined with the proposed ageing classification system, they provide a significantly improved picture of a journal's impact to that obtained from the JCR.
-
Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987)
0.03
0.03438512 = product of:
0.10315535 = sum of:
0.10315535 = weight(_text_:management in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10315535 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
-
Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975)
0.03
0.030086977 = product of:
0.09026093 = sum of:
0.09026093 = weight(_text_:management in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09026093 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002)
0.03
0.030086977 = product of:
0.09026093 = sum of:
0.09026093 = weight(_text_:management in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09026093 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.01855722 = product of:
0.05567166 = sum of:
0.05567166 = product of:
0.11134332 = sum of:
0.11134332 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11134332 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.01855722 = product of:
0.05567166 = sum of:
0.05567166 = product of:
0.11134332 = sum of:
0.11134332 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11134332 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.02
0.01719256 = product of:
0.051577676 = sum of:
0.051577676 = weight(_text_:management in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051577676 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.01640242 = product of:
0.04920726 = sum of:
0.04920726 = product of:
0.09841452 = sum of:
0.09841452 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09841452 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998)
0.02
0.015011381 = product of:
0.045034144 = sum of:
0.045034144 = product of:
0.09006829 = sum of:
0.09006829 = weight(_text_:system in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09006829 = score(doc=5129,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
-
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005)
0.01
0.01289442 = product of:
0.038683258 = sum of:
0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038683258 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1534-1547
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.011598263 = product of:
0.03479479 = sum of:
0.03479479 = product of:
0.06958958 = sum of:
0.06958958 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06958958 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051362853 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
