Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012) 0.02
    0.024866577 = product of:
      0.07459973 = sum of:
        0.07459973 = sum of:
          0.03980494 = weight(_text_:system in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03980494 = score(doc=116,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051362853 = queryNorm
              0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
          0.03479479 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03479479 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051362853 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The origin of the abridged edition of the Dewey system goes back to 1894 when an outline of 192 pages based on the full 5th Edition (1894) was issued for small public and school libraries of North America. New editions have appeared regularly following closely the publication of new full editions. An abridged version, which is always in one volume, comprises an introduction, schedules, four tables (namely 1, 2, 3 and 4) only, and the relative index and other minor features of the full edition, and has shorter numbers. Abridged 15 is a logical abridgement of the DDC23 (2011) and is a product of a new approach to development of an abridged edition of the DDC. Its content has been derived from the DDC database applying a set of rules to extract the edition using the new (2010) version of the editorial support system. The revision process has been informed by interaction with an always widening and diversified Dewey community at home and abroad. It aims to improve the currency of the schedules continuing to serve as shelving tool while recognizing its 'other' uses as a spinoff of its simplicity and inexpensiveness.
    Date
    3. 3.2016 18:59:22
  2. Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992) 0.02
    0.024152955 = product of:
      0.03622943 = sum of:
        0.019341629 = weight(_text_:management in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019341629 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.11172107 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
        0.016887804 = product of:
          0.03377561 = sum of:
            0.03377561 = weight(_text_:system in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03377561 = score(doc=2072,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  3. Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971) 0.02
    0.01855722 = product of:
      0.05567166 = sum of:
        0.05567166 = product of:
          0.11134332 = sum of:
            0.11134332 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11134332 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997) 0.02
    0.015196219 = product of:
      0.045588657 = sum of:
        0.045588657 = weight(_text_:management in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045588657 = score(doc=141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the bibliographic enterprise envisaged by Otlet and LaFontaine, which resulted in the UDC being developed in 1895, and the subsequent history of the scheme. Relationship with DDC from which it was derived deteriorated in the early 20th century and changes in funding, location, and editorship of Duyvis from 1929-59 had a profound effect on the scheme's development and management. Lloyd, Duyvis successor, reformed the revision structure, and further management changes from 1975 to the present day, culminated in the formation of the UDC Consortium in 1992. Notes the subsequent creation of a machine-readable Master Reference File and speedier revision procedures. Examines the scheme's structure, development, and influence on classification theory, problems caused by longevity and lack of standrad procedures, and highlights proposals for their reform to improve the scheme's suitability for an automated world. Explores research projects in 1960s which foreshadowed possibilities today, such as a complementary thesaurus and individualisation of single concepts notationally. Emphasizes the value of classification in a multilingual environment and outlines the future developments
  5. Bliss, H.E.: ¬The organization of knowledge and the system of the sciences (1929) 0.02
    0.015011381 = product of:
      0.045034144 = sum of:
        0.045034144 = product of:
          0.09006829 = sum of:
            0.09006829 = weight(_text_:system in 99) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09006829 = score(doc=99,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 99, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=99)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. System des Real-Katalogs der Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg (1885) 0.02
    0.015011381 = product of:
      0.045034144 = sum of:
        0.045034144 = product of:
          0.09006829 = sum of:
            0.09006829 = weight(_text_:system in 4381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09006829 = score(doc=4381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Hansson, J.: Why public libraries in Sweden did not choose Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.014893645 = product of:
      0.044680934 = sum of:
        0.044680934 = product of:
          0.08936187 = sum of:
            0.08936187 = weight(_text_:system in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08936187 = score(doc=312,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.5524007 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The article identifies 2 distinct sections, one within the public library sphere and one in academic libraries, relevant for the development of a unique Swedish classification system (the SAB-system) to be used in public libraries. These are used to analyse the social and discursive influences that led to a rejection of the DDC as the common classification system for the public libraries in Sweden. The author analyses the debate that took place in the 1910s in various publications and idetifies theoretical as well as some practical reasons for rejecting the DDC. Reference is also made to the situation in Norway and Denmark at this time and their attempts to influence Sweden to accept the DDC as had been done in these countries. Conclusions are drawn that the reasons for rejection of the DDC not only is to be sought in theoretical or even practical problems regarding the system itself but in the academic library sector which, through the SAB-system, could create a lasting influence on the knowledge organisation in public libraries in order to uphold the national identity of thre Swedish library system
    Object
    SAB-System
  8. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.01
    0.013917915 = product of:
      0.041753743 = sum of:
        0.041753743 = product of:
          0.083507486 = sum of:
            0.083507486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083507486 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
  9. Kleinschmidt, H.: Vom System zur Ordnung: Bemerkungen zu Bewertungen von Sachkatalogen vornehmlich im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (1987) 0.01
    0.013134959 = product of:
      0.039404877 = sum of:
        0.039404877 = product of:
          0.07880975 = sum of:
            0.07880975 = weight(_text_:system in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07880975 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Petits petales : a tribute to S.R. Ranganathan (1993) 0.01
    0.01289442 = product of:
      0.038683258 = sum of:
        0.038683258 = weight(_text_:management in 7646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038683258 = score(doc=7646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17312427 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051362853 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 7646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7646)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    KUMAR, P.S.G.: Ranganathan through classification; LANGRIDGE, D.W.: My debt to Ranganathan; SUBBA RAO, C.V.: Controversies on Dr. S.R. Ranganathan; CHAND, K. u. G. SINGH: Impact of information technology on Ranganathan's five laws; SATIJA, M.P.: Research in librarianship before and after Ranganathan; BATTY, C.D.: The influence of Ranganathan on the structural design of index languages; DHYANI, P.: Ranganathan's normatice principles and Dewey Decimal Classification; FRIIS-HANSEN, J.: Facets and clusters; HUNTER, E.J.: Ranganathan UK: The influence of Ranganathan's work on the development of classification and indexing in the United Kingdom; McILWAINE, I.C.: Ranganathan and classification in Britain; BAKEWELL, K.G.B.: Ranganathan and library management; BHARGAVA, G,D.: Dr. S.R. Ranganathan - my teacher and mentor; NAVALINI, K.: The tallest torch bearer; COMARONI, J.P.: Ranganathan's influence on American librarianship; KONNOR, M.B.: Dr. S.R. Ranganathan - American view; SHARMA, R.N.: Ranganathan and the United States
  11. Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985) 0.01
    0.01061465 = product of:
      0.03184395 = sum of:
        0.03184395 = product of:
          0.0636879 = sum of:
            0.0636879 = weight(_text_:system in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0636879 = score(doc=3623,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    It has been generally recognized that the Library of Congress Classification, developed at the turn of the century, has been based an practical rather than theoreti cal or philosophical considerations. Unlike most of the other library classification systems, which originated from individual minds, the Library of Congress Classification system was the result of corporate efforts. Nonetheless, there were a number of individuals who, in the early stages of its development, provided guidance regarding the general framework and direction of the scheme. The most important among these was Charles Martel (1860-1945) who was Chief Classifier at the Library of Congress when the system was first developed. In a paper read before the New Zealand Library Association in April 1911, from which the following excerpt has been taken, Martel gave his views concerning library classification in general and provided a glimpse of the rationale behind the Library of Congress Classification system in particular. In the following excerpt, Martel discusses the basis of the Library of Congress Classification system to be not "the scientific order of subjects ... [but] rather [a] convenient sequence of the various groups ... of books." This is the "literary warrant" an which the Library of Congress system has been based. With regard to the notation, Martel argues for brevity in preference to symmetry or mnemonics. Brevity of notation has since been recognized as one of the greatest advantages of the Library of Congress system as a device for shelf arrangement of books. Martel outlines seven groupings used in the system for subarranging books an the subject, first by form and then by subject subdivisions. This pattern, known as Martel's "seven points," has served as the general framework in individual classes and provided the most significant unifying factor for individual classes in the system, which contain many unique or disparate characteristics.
  12. Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984) 0.01
    0.01061465 = product of:
      0.03184395 = sum of:
        0.03184395 = product of:
          0.0636879 = sum of:
            0.0636879 = weight(_text_:system in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0636879 = score(doc=4521,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    J. Kaiser (1868-1927) developed a system of subject indexing based on what he called "concretes" and "processes" to govern the form of subject headings and subdivisions. Although Kaiser applied his systematic indexing to specialized technical and business collections, his ideas are entirely applicable to all book collections and catalogs. Though largely ignored, Kaiser's system is of permanent interest in the study of the development of subject analysis
  13. LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007) 0.01
    0.01061465 = product of:
      0.03184395 = sum of:
        0.03184395 = product of:
          0.0636879 = sum of:
            0.0636879 = weight(_text_:system in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0636879 = score(doc=689,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Revisits the heritage of faceted classification (FC) beginning with an examination of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in its early manifestations and the groundwork established by international documentalist groups. Early document retrieval experimentation with FC during the intensive period of system design, testing and evaluation in the 1950s and 1960s is discussed, as well as the rise of an international discourse community that sought to augment and extend the reach of FC through system implementations. A list of acronyms employed in the article is given in an appendix.
  14. Sukiasyan, E.: Classification systems in their historical development : problems of typology and terminology (1998) 0.01
    0.009750179 = product of:
      0.029250536 = sum of:
        0.029250536 = product of:
          0.058501072 = sum of:
            0.058501072 = weight(_text_:system in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058501072 = score(doc=80,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The history of structural development of classification systems (CS) is typologically divided into three main stages. Enumerative CS developed from ordinal towards hierarchical. In combinational CS, combinatory techniques evolved from division by analogy towards a fully-fledged system of typical subdivisions of general and special use. Syntactic designations were employed to combine notational symbols within wide limits. The invention of categorial analysis facilitated the development of faceted or analytical-synthetic CS. The system types under consideration are functioning simultaneously in the indexing practice. Clearly defined continuity can be observed. Each higher-ranking type comprises structural elements of its predecessor. Otherwise stated, each combinational classification contains elements of an enumerative one, while each faceted or analytical-synthetic CS includes elements of a combinational system
  15. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.01
    0.00927861 = product of:
      0.02783583 = sum of:
        0.02783583 = product of:
          0.05567166 = sum of:
            0.05567166 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05567166 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  16. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985) 0.01
    0.009192557 = product of:
      0.02757767 = sum of:
        0.02757767 = product of:
          0.05515534 = sum of:
            0.05515534 = weight(_text_:system in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05515534 = score(doc=3628,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.3409491 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
  17. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.01
    0.008118784 = product of:
      0.02435635 = sum of:
        0.02435635 = product of:
          0.0487127 = sum of:
            0.0487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0487127 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  18. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.01
    0.008118784 = product of:
      0.02435635 = sum of:
        0.02435635 = product of:
          0.0487127 = sum of:
            0.0487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0487127 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  19. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.01
    0.008118784 = product of:
      0.02435635 = sum of:
        0.02435635 = product of:
          0.0487127 = sum of:
            0.0487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0487127 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17986396 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  20. Runge, S.: Beiträge zur Sachkatalogisierung (1937) 0.01
    0.0075056907 = product of:
      0.022517072 = sum of:
        0.022517072 = product of:
          0.045034144 = sum of:
            0.045034144 = weight(_text_:system in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045034144 = score(doc=3328,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16177002 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051362853 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: RUNGE, S.: Wege und Möglichkeiten gemeinschaftlicher Sachkatalogisierung; FRAUENDORFER, S. von: Wo liegen die Grenzen für die Aufstellung und Verwendung bibliographischer Einheitssysteme?; RUNGE, S.: Die Deweysche Dezimalklassifikation [DDC] im Vergleich zur Brüsseler Dezimalklassifikation [UDC]; KLEMM, F.: Die Cuttersche Expansive Classification; MOGK, H.: Das System der Kongreßbibliothek in Washington [LCC]; FAASS, B.: Die neuen Fachkataloge des sächsischen Landesbibliothek; NISSEN, C.: Der Mainzer Sachkatalog in Theorie und Praxis; SCHMITZ, W.: Der Katalog "Technik" der Preußischen Staatsbibliothek; RUNGE, S.: Die Bezeichnung im systematischen Katalog

Languages

  • e 27
  • d 8
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • ? 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…