-
Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006)
0.06
0.06171181 = product of:
0.12342362 = sum of:
0.12342362 = sum of:
0.08910345 = weight(_text_:mining in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08910345 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28585905 = queryWeight, product of:
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.31170416 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.034320172 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034320172 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Document keyphrases provide a concise summary of a document's content, offering semantic metadata summarizing a document. They can be used in many applications related to knowledge management and text mining, such as automatic text summarization, development of search engines, document clustering, document classification, thesaurus construction, and browsing interfaces. Because only a small portion of documents have keyphrases assigned by authors, and it is time-consuming and costly to manually assign keyphrases to documents, it is necessary to develop an algorithm to automatically generate keyphrases for documents. This paper describes a Keyphrase Identification Program (KIP), which extracts document keyphrases by using prior positive samples of human identified phrases to assign weights to the candidate keyphrases. The logic of our algorithm is: The more keywords a candidate keyphrase contains and the more significant these keywords are, the more likely this candidate phrase is a keyphrase. KIP's learning function can enrich the glossary database by automatically adding new identified keyphrases to the database. KIP's personalization feature will let the user build a glossary database specifically suitable for the area of his/her interest. The evaluation results show that KIP's performance is better than the systems we compared to and that the learning function is effective.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:25:48
-
Ouyang, Y.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Lu, Q.: Intertopic information mining for query-based summarization (2010)
0.03
0.031502828 = product of:
0.063005656 = sum of:
0.063005656 = product of:
0.12601131 = sum of:
0.12601131 = weight(_text_:mining in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12601131 = score(doc=3459,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28585905 = queryWeight, product of:
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.44081625 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, the authors address the problem of sentence ranking in summarization. Although most existing summarization approaches are concerned with the information embodied in a particular topic (including a set of documents and an associated query) for sentence ranking, they propose a novel ranking approach that incorporates intertopic information mining. Intertopic information, in contrast to intratopic information, is able to reveal pairwise topic relationships and thus can be considered as the bridge across different topics. In this article, the intertopic information is used for transferring word importance learned from known topics to unknown topics under a learning-based summarization framework. To mine this information, the authors model the topic relationship by clustering all the words in both known and unknown topics according to various kinds of word conceptual labels, which indicate the roles of the words in the topic. Based on the mined relationships, we develop a probabilistic model using manually generated summaries provided for known topics to predict ranking scores for sentences in unknown topics. A series of experiments have been conducted on the Document Understanding Conference (DUC) 2006 data set. The evaluation results show that intertopic information is indeed effective for sentence ranking and the resultant summarization system performs comparably well to the best-performing DUC participating systems on the same data set.
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.01
0.013728068 = product of:
0.027456136 = sum of:
0.027456136 = product of:
0.054912273 = sum of:
0.054912273 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054912273 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.01
0.013728068 = product of:
0.027456136 = sum of:
0.027456136 = product of:
0.054912273 = sum of:
0.054912273 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054912273 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.01
0.013728068 = product of:
0.027456136 = sum of:
0.027456136 = product of:
0.054912273 = sum of:
0.054912273 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054912273 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.01
0.01029605 = product of:
0.0205921 = sum of:
0.0205921 = product of:
0.0411842 = sum of:
0.0411842 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0411842 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016)
0.01
0.008580043 = product of:
0.017160086 = sum of:
0.017160086 = product of:
0.034320172 = sum of:
0.034320172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034320172 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:29:41
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.01
0.008580043 = product of:
0.017160086 = sum of:
0.017160086 = product of:
0.034320172 = sum of:
0.034320172 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034320172 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023)
0.01
0.008580043 = product of:
0.017160086 = sum of:
0.017160086 = product of:
0.034320172 = sum of:
0.034320172 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034320172 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17741053 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05066224 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:55:20
