Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Boßmeyer, C.: Elektronische Texte und Dokument-Formate (1997) 0.04
    0.04388957 = product of:
      0.08777914 = sum of:
        0.08777914 = product of:
          0.17555828 = sum of:
            0.17555828 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 6458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17555828 = score(doc=6458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.6752353 = fieldWeight in 6458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  2. Lehmann, K.-D.: ¬Die Mühen der Ebenen : Regelwerke - Datenformate - Kommunikationsschnittstellen (1997) 0.04
    0.04388957 = product of:
      0.08777914 = sum of:
        0.08777914 = product of:
          0.17555828 = sum of:
            0.17555828 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 7715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17555828 = score(doc=7715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.6752353 = fieldWeight in 7715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  3. Henze, V.: ¬Die Deutsche Bibliothek : 1. Ergänzungslieferung zur MAB2-Dokumentation (1996) 0.04
    0.036574643 = product of:
      0.073149286 = sum of:
        0.073149286 = product of:
          0.14629857 = sum of:
            0.14629857 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14629857 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.56269604 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  4. Palme, J.: HTML / XML / SGML : Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede (1998) 0.03
    0.031034613 = product of:
      0.062069226 = sum of:
        0.062069226 = product of:
          0.12413845 = sum of:
            0.12413845 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 6620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12413845 = score(doc=6620,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.47746342 = fieldWeight in 6620, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von den Begriffen Dokumentation und Publikation werden die Probleme bei der Erfassung, Speicherung, Bereitstellung und langfristigen Archivierung von elektronischen Dokumenten mit komplexen Inhalten thematisiert. Der ISO-Standard 8879 (Standard Generalized Markup Language - SGML) stellt ein Konzept für die rStrukturierung von Wissen, das in elektronischen Dokumenten verschiedenster Art enthalten ist, zur Verfügung. Da SGML ein internationaler Standard ist und auf dem Prinzip der Hard- und Softwareunabhängigkeit basiert, kann SGML für Verwaltung und Pflege von komplexen Lebenszeitendokumenten eingesetzt werden. Die am Inhalt orientierte Strukturierung der Dokumente läßt sich darüber hinaus für ein qualitätvolles Retrieval nutzen. In Abgrenzung zu SGML werden die von dieser Norm abgeleiteten Konzepte von XML (Extensible Markup Language) und HTML (HyperText Markup Language) vorgestellt.
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Wissensorganisation: Visualisierung, multimediale Dokumente, Internetstrukturen. 5. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Berlin, 07.-10. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  5. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse von Dokumenten (1997) 0.03
    0.031034613 = product of:
      0.062069226 = sum of:
        0.062069226 = product of:
          0.12413845 = sum of:
            0.12413845 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12413845 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.47746342 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die formale Analyse von Dokumenten ist seit alters her eine der Hauptaufgaben der Bibliotheken und Archive, in neuerer Zeit auch der Dokumentationsstellen. Die gesammelten und ausgewerteten Dokumente müssen identifizierbar und wieder auffindbar sein. Die formale Analyse bietet die Möglichkeit, die formalen Charakteristika von Dokumenten zu beschreiben. Damit können die Dokumente unter mehreren, aber immer den formal gleichen Such- und Ordnungsmerkmalen in Katalogen, Datenbanken, Bibliographien o.ä. nachgewiesen werden. Hierzu werden nach festgelegten Regeln die verschiedenen formalen Charakteristika zu "Auswertungselementen" zusammengefaßt, die jeweils eine sinnvoll nicht weiter zu unterteilende Klasse zusammengehöriger Charakteristika bilden (z.B. ist ein Datum, bestehend aus Tag, Monat, Jahr nicht weiter zu unterteilen und bildet deshalb ein Auswertungselement). Alle bei der formalen Analyse ermittelten Auswertungselemente für die Beschreibung eines Dokumentes werden in festgelegter Form und Reihenfolge niedergeschrieben. Aus der vollständigen Menge von Auswertungselementen wird nur ein bestimmter Teil als Ordnungs- oder Suchmerkmale ausgewählt. Das Ergebnis der formalen Analyse wird gemeinhin "Titelaufnahme" oder "Fundstelle" oder "Zitat" genannt.
  6. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029344633 = product of:
      0.058689266 = sum of:
        0.058689266 = product of:
          0.11737853 = sum of:
            0.11737853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11737853 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  7. Willer, M.: Formats and cataloguing rules : developments for cataloguing electronic resources (1999) 0.03
    0.029259713 = product of:
      0.058519427 = sum of:
        0.058519427 = product of:
          0.11703885 = sum of:
            0.11703885 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11703885 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.45015684 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  8. Schwarz, I.; Umstätter, W.: Zum Prinzip der Objektdarstellung in SGML (1998) 0.03
    0.025862178 = product of:
      0.051724356 = sum of:
        0.051724356 = product of:
          0.10344871 = sum of:
            0.10344871 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 6617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10344871 = score(doc=6617,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.3978862 = fieldWeight in 6617, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6617)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Semantische Thesauri sind dazu geeignet, Wissen zu strukturieren. Der vorliegende Beitrag soll unter anderem deutlich machen, daß die SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language) ein mögliches Instrument zum Aufbau semantischer Thesauri ist. Die SGML ist eine Metasprache, die geeignet ist, Texte in natürlicher Sprache mit Strukturen zu versehen, die das Erkennen des Informationsgehaltes eines Dokuments erleichtern. Zugleich wird damit unter anderem die Voraussetzung dafür geschaffen, Volltextindexierungen in einer Weise vorzunehmen, wie dies bislang nicht möglich war. Die rasant zunehmende Bedeutung der SGML, liegt zweifellos an der bekanntesten Document Type Definition (DTD) im Rahmen der SGML, der Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), wie wir sie im WWW (World Wide Web) des Internet in Anwendung finden. Darüber hinaus erfüllt SGML je nach DTD die Bedingungen, die Objektorientiertheit unserer natürlichen Sprache mit ihren definierbaren Begriffen sinnvoll zu unterstützen und beispielsweise mit Hilfe der objektorientierten Programmiersprache JAVA zu verarbeiten. Besonders hervorzuheben ist die sich damit verändernde Publikationsform bei wissensbasierten Texten, in denen SGML-Dokumente nicht mehr nur für sich zu betrachten sind, wie Zeitschriftenaufsätze oder Bücher, sondern die darüber hinaus in Form von Wissenselementen in einer Daten- und Wissensbank organisiert und recherchiert werden können
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Wissensorganisation: Visualisierung, multimediale Dokumente, Internetstrukturen. 5. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Berlin, 07.-10. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  9. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.03
    0.02560225 = product of:
      0.0512045 = sum of:
        0.0512045 = product of:
          0.102409 = sum of:
            0.102409 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102409 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.39388722 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  10. Oeltjen, W.: Dokumentenstrukturen manipulieren und visualisieren : über das Arbeiten mit der logischen Struktur (1998) 0.03
    0.02560225 = product of:
      0.0512045 = sum of:
        0.0512045 = product of:
          0.102409 = sum of:
            0.102409 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 6616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102409 = score(doc=6616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.39388722 = fieldWeight in 6616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Wissensorganisation: Visualisierung, multimediale Dokumente, Internetstrukturen. 5. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Berlin, 07.-10. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: H. Czap u.a
  11. Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994) 0.02
    0.021944785 = product of:
      0.04388957 = sum of:
        0.04388957 = product of:
          0.08777914 = sum of:
            0.08777914 = weight(_text_:dokumente in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08777914 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25999573 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.33761764 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.092943 = idf(docFreq=737, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Form
    Elektronische Dokumente
  12. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02
    0.020749787 = product of:
      0.041499574 = sum of:
        0.041499574 = product of:
          0.08299915 = sum of:
            0.08299915 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08299915 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  13. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.019563088 = product of:
      0.039126176 = sum of:
        0.039126176 = product of:
          0.07825235 = sum of:
            0.07825235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07825235 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  14. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.02
    0.01729149 = product of:
      0.03458298 = sum of:
        0.03458298 = product of:
          0.06916596 = sum of:
            0.06916596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06916596 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  15. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.02
    0.017117701 = product of:
      0.034235403 = sum of:
        0.034235403 = product of:
          0.068470806 = sum of:
            0.068470806 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068470806 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  16. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.013833192 = product of:
      0.027666384 = sum of:
        0.027666384 = product of:
          0.05533277 = sum of:
            0.05533277 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05533277 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  17. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01
    0.013833192 = product of:
      0.027666384 = sum of:
        0.027666384 = product of:
          0.05533277 = sum of:
            0.05533277 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05533277 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  18. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.01
    0.013833192 = product of:
      0.027666384 = sum of:
        0.027666384 = product of:
          0.05533277 = sum of:
            0.05533277 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05533277 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  19. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.01
    0.013833192 = product of:
      0.027666384 = sum of:
        0.027666384 = product of:
          0.05533277 = sum of:
            0.05533277 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05533277 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37
  20. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.01
    0.013833192 = product of:
      0.027666384 = sum of:
        0.027666384 = product of:
          0.05533277 = sum of:
            0.05533277 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05533277 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17876907 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05105019 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51