Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Belkin, N.J."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Belkin, N.J.: ¬The use of multiple information problem representation for information retrieval (1994) 0.02
    0.023769518 = product of:
      0.07130855 = sum of:
        0.07130855 = product of:
          0.10696283 = sum of:
            0.031153653 = weight(_text_:online in 8579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031153653 = score(doc=8579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 8579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8579)
            0.07580918 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07580918 = score(doc=8579,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 8579, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8579)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the general issues of the effect and use of multiple representations of the same information problem, or topics, on information retrieval system performance. It has been known for some time that different representations of the same information problem retrieve different sets (or lists) of documents, both relevant and non-relevant. More recently, there have been a number of studies investigating the effects of combining, in various ways, such different representations, in order to try to get a single response from the information retrieval system which is better than that for any of the single representations. Discusses the rationale, both empirical and theoretical, for such an approach, and surveys the results of recent research projects in this area. All of them demonstrate the same phenomenon; the more representations one can combine, the better the retrieval performance. Discusses the implications of these results for information retrieval system design and information retrieval
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th National Online Meeting 1994, New York, 10-12 May 1994. Ed. by M.E. Williams
  2. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.02
    0.017607858 = product of:
      0.052823573 = sum of:
        0.052823573 = product of:
          0.07923536 = sum of:
            0.04467099 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04467099 = score(doc=2339,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
            0.03456437 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03456437 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  3. Belkin, N.J.: Interaction with texts : information retrieval as information seeking behavior (1993) 0.01
    0.011347376 = product of:
      0.034042127 = sum of:
        0.034042127 = product of:
          0.10212638 = sum of:
            0.10212638 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10212638 = score(doc=5594,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 5594, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5594)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information Retrieval '93: von der Modellierung zur Anwendung. Hrsg.: G. Knorz u.a
  4. Belkin, N.J.: Intelligent information retrieval : whose intelligence? (1996) 0.01
    0.01087436 = product of:
      0.03262308 = sum of:
        0.03262308 = product of:
          0.09786923 = sum of:
            0.09786923 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09786923 = score(doc=6102,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.63411707 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of 'intelligent' information retrieval was first mooted in the late 1970s, but had lost currency within the information retrieval community by at least the early 1990s. With the popularity of the concept of 'intelligent agents', it appears that the idea of intelligent information retrieval is again in general vogue. In this paper, I attempt to show that the naive concept of intelligent information retrieval, based on the the idea of agency, misses the essence of intelligence in the information retrieval system, and will inevitably lead to dysfunctional information retrieval. As a counter-proposal, I suggest that true intelligence in information retrieval resides in appropriate allocation of responsibility amongst all the actors in the information retrieval system, and that intelligent information retrieval will be achieved through effective support of people in their various interactions with information
  5. Belkin, N.J.; Marchetti, P.G.; Cool, C.: BRAQUE: design of an interface to support user interaction in information retrieval (1993) 0.01
    0.008023808 = product of:
      0.024071421 = sum of:
        0.024071421 = product of:
          0.07221426 = sum of:
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=4712,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4712, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4712)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Information filtering and information retrieval : two sides of the same coin? (1992) 0.01
    0.006877549 = product of:
      0.020632647 = sum of:
        0.020632647 = product of:
          0.06189794 = sum of:
            0.06189794 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06189794 = score(doc=6093,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6093, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6093)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Belkin, N.J.; Cool, C.; Koenemann, J.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: Using relevance feedback and ranking in interactive searching (1996) 0.01
    0.006877549 = product of:
      0.020632647 = sum of:
        0.020632647 = product of:
          0.06189794 = sum of:
            0.06189794 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06189794 = score(doc=7588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 7588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7588)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    The Fourth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-4). Ed.: K. Harman
  8. Belkin, N.J.; Chang, S.J.; Downs, T.; Saracevic, T.; Zhao, S.: Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs (1990) 0.01
    0.005769195 = product of:
      0.017307585 = sum of:
        0.017307585 = product of:
          0.051922753 = sum of:
            0.051922753 = weight(_text_:online in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051922753 = score(doc=5261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Belkin, N.J.; Cabezas, A.; Cool, C.; Kim, K.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.; Pressman, R.; Rieh, S.; Savage, P.; Xie, H.: Rutgers interactive track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01
    0.005731291 = product of:
      0.017193872 = sum of:
        0.017193872 = product of:
          0.051581617 = sum of:
            0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051581617 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5). Ed.: E.M. Voorhees u. D.K. Harman
  10. Savage-Knepshield, P.A.; Belkin, N.J.: Interaction in information retrieval : trends over time (1999) 0.01
    0.005731291 = product of:
      0.017193872 = sum of:
        0.017193872 = product of:
          0.051581617 = sum of:
            0.051581617 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051581617 = score(doc=4329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)