Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986)
0.01
0.00794151 = product of:
0.023824528 = sum of:
0.023824528 = product of:
0.07147358 = sum of:
0.07147358 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07147358 = score(doc=684,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051022716 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A survey of abstracting policies by producers of bibliographical databases examined abstracting guidelines which aim to enhance free- text retrieval. Of the 123 database policies examined, fifty-seven (46 per cent) included such instructions. Editors consider contents of abstracts and their language as a primary factor in retrieval enhancement. Most recommend that once abstractors decide which concepts to include in abstracts and in which form to represent them, these terms should be co-ordinated with index terms assigned from a controlled vocabulary. Guidelines about the type of abstracts, i.e., informative or indicative, and about their length are not affected by the capability of free-text retrieval
