Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Swanson, D.R."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Swanson, D.R.: Subjective versus objective relevance in bibliographic retrieval systems (1986) 0.03
    0.025113732 = product of:
      0.075341195 = sum of:
        0.075341195 = product of:
          0.113011785 = sum of:
            0.0415382 = weight(_text_:online in 838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0415382 = score(doc=838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=838)
            0.07147358 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07147358 = score(doc=838,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 838, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=838)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The distinction between subjective and objective relevance of a document to a request, athough heretofore given little explicit recognition, is of importance to information retrieval as well as to certain broader issues in librarianship. Objective relevance is crucial to the design and testing of bibliographic retrieval systems, while subjective relevance is paramount in the operation and use of such sustems. The distinction provides a rationale for a trial-and error mode of interaction with libraries, online databases, and other information systems. The concept of objective relevance introduced here is illuminated by earlier work on logical relevance by Patrick Wilson and William Cooper
  2. Swanson, D.R.: Historical note: information retrieval and the future of an illusion (1988) 0.01
    0.009726323 = product of:
      0.02917897 = sum of:
        0.02917897 = product of:
          0.08753691 = sum of:
            0.08753691 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08753691 = score(doc=1950,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.553-561.
  3. Swanson, D.R.: Online search for logically-related noninteractive medical literatures : a systematic trial-and-error strategy (1989) 0.01
    0.008076874 = product of:
      0.02423062 = sum of:
        0.02423062 = product of:
          0.07269186 = sum of:
            0.07269186 = weight(_text_:online in 202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07269186 = score(doc=202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=202)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)