Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Massey, S.A.; Malinconico, S.M.: Cutting cataloging costs : accepting LC Classification call numbers from OCLC cataloging copy (1997) 0.02
    0.01610068 = product of:
      0.04830204 = sum of:
        0.04830204 = product of:
          0.07245306 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
            0.03610713 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03610713 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging policy at the Alabama University Libraries allows the acceptance of LCC call numbers from OCLC cataloguing copy into the local database without shelflisting. Reports results of a study to measure error rates for locally unshelflisted samples and a control group of locally assigned and shelflisted call numbers to determine whether this policy produces disarrangement of the local online shelflist. Results show no significant differences between samples, indicating that the cataloguer's task of local shelflisting is not a cost effective use of their time. Analysis of the error data suggests that the types of disorder created by shelflisting errors would not impede the retrieval of items while subject browsing, but further study is needed to confirm this
  2. Maarek, Y.S.; Wecker, A.J.: ¬The librarian's assistent : automatically organizing books into dynamic bookshelves (1994) 0.01
    0.008023808 = product of:
      0.024071421 = sum of:
        0.024071421 = product of:
          0.07221426 = sum of:
            0.07221426 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07221426 = score(doc=6801,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6801, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6801)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Intelligent multimedia information retrieval systems and management: RIAO'94 Conference Proceedings. Vol.1
  3. Kinnaly, G.: Automating the LC shelflist (1996) 0.01
    0.006994778 = product of:
      0.020984333 = sum of:
        0.020984333 = product of:
          0.062952995 = sum of:
            0.062952995 = weight(_text_:online in 4697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062952995 = score(doc=4697,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 4697, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4697)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes plans to automate the LoC shelf list which consists of around 13.335.000 3x5 inch cards. The card shelf list records the holdings and location information for all monographs and some serial receiving LC classification and is used to determine the correct filing position and unique full card number for new materials so that they are properly shelved within the existing collection. A Shelflist Task Group, set up in Oct. 94, has recommended a retrospective conversion of the existing card shelf list to an online system which would support a call number assignment and maintenance and online inventory control. The benefits of an online shelf list are outlined and the outlook appears positive for a commitment on the part of the library to automate both the process of shelflisting and the shelf list as an inventory control
  4. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.01
    0.006144777 = product of:
      0.01843433 = sum of:
        0.01843433 = product of:
          0.055302992 = sum of:
            0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055302992 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
  5. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.01
    0.006144777 = product of:
      0.01843433 = sum of:
        0.01843433 = product of:
          0.055302992 = sum of:
            0.055302992 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055302992 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
  6. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.01
    0.005673688 = product of:
      0.017021064 = sum of:
        0.017021064 = product of:
          0.05106319 = sum of:
            0.05106319 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05106319 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
  7. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.01
    0.00537668 = product of:
      0.01613004 = sum of:
        0.01613004 = product of:
          0.048390117 = sum of:
            0.048390117 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048390117 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
  8. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.00
    0.0046085827 = product of:
      0.013825747 = sum of:
        0.013825747 = product of:
          0.04147724 = sum of:
            0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04147724 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.00
    0.0046085827 = product of:
      0.013825747 = sum of:
        0.013825747 = product of:
          0.04147724 = sum of:
            0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04147724 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
  10. Losee, R.M.: ¬The relative shelf location of circulated books : a study of classification, users, and browsing (1993) 0.00
    0.004038437 = product of:
      0.01211531 = sum of:
        0.01211531 = product of:
          0.03634593 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Patrons often browse through books organized by a library classification system, looking for books to use and possibly circulate. This research is an examination of the clustering of similar books provided by a classification system and ways in which the books that patrons circulate are clustered. Measures of classification system performance are suggested and used to evaluate two test collections. Regression formulas are derived describing the relationships among the number of areas in which books were found (the number of stops a patron makes when browsing), the distances across a cluster, and the average number of books a patron circulates. Patrons were found usually to make more stops than there were books found at their average stop. Consequences for full-text document systems and online catalogs are suggested
  11. Steele, T.D.; Foote, J.B.: Reclassification in academic research libraries : is it still relevant in an e-book world? (2011) 0.00
    0.004038437 = product of:
      0.01211531 = sum of:
        0.01211531 = product of:
          0.03634593 = sum of:
            0.03634593 = weight(_text_:online in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03634593 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines whether academic libraries are still reclassifying materials, how they are doing so, and if the acquisition of electronic materials has an impact on reclassification efforts. An online survey was sent to the heads of cataloging units at libraries belonging to the Association of Research Libraries to answer these questions. Almost one-third of libraries are currently involved in reclassification projects. Most respondents reported they do not believe that purchasing e-books has affected their decisions about reclassification. The article also examines the faceted search capability of next-generation catalogs and their possible impact on patrons' use of classification.